journal article·2005-10Open access

TiO2 Nanoparticle–Photopolymer Composites for Volume Holographic Recording

C. Sánchez, M. J. Escuti, C. van Heesch, C. W. M. Bastiaansen, D. J. Broer, J. Loos, R. Nussbaumer

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract A new and efficient photopolymer for the recording of volume holograms is presented. The material comprises a mixture of UV‐sensitive acrylates and grafted titanium dioxide nanoparticles with an average size of 4 nm. We report the formation of holographic gratings with refractive‐index modulation amplitudes of up to 15.5 × 10–3—an improvement of more than a factor of four over the base material without nanoparticles—while maintaining a low level of scattering and a high transparency in the visible‐wavelength range. The influence of the composition of the acrylate system on the final properties of the holographic material is also investigated and discussed. The presence of multifunctional monomers favors the compositional segregation of the different components, while the addition of monofunctional acrylate, highly compatible with the grafting of the nanoparticles, favors the dilution of these nanoparticles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Photonic and Optical Devices · Liquid Crystal Research Advancements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. R. T. Ingwall D. Waldman inHolographic Data Storage(Eds: H. J. Coufal D. Psaltis G. T. Sincerbox) Springer Berlin2000.
2. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1219::AID-ADMA1219>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199810)10:15<1219::AID-ADMA1219>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
3. 10.1117/12.797357910.1117/12.7973579 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.8310.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.83 ↗
5. Gambogi W. J. · Proc. SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 1993 · 2043 · 2
6. Waldman D. A. · SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 1996 · 2689 · 127
7. Paraschis L. · SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 1998 · 3468 · 55
8. 10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:20<1570::AID-ADMA1570>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/1521-4095(200110)13:20<1570::AID-ADMA1570>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
9. 10.1063/1.152539110.1063/1.1525391 ↗
10. 10.1023/A:102114112425710.1023/A:1021141124257 ↗
11. 10.1002/mame.20029003210.1002/mame.200290032 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nainr.2003.08.01010.1016/j.nainr.2003.08.010 ↗
13. 10.1021/cm970305l10.1021/cm970305l ↗
14. 10.1063/1.168845810.1063/1.1688458 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.175123710.1063/1.1751237 ↗
16. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1969.tb01198.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1969.tb01198.x ↗
17. 10.1063/1.135466510.1063/1.1354665 ↗
18. The refractive index of the photopolymer was 1.50 at 589 nm (measured with an Abbe refractometer). DBSA (Fluka) has a refractive index of 1.51 at 589 nm. The refractive index of the rutile is 2.3 at 589 nm as estimated previously [10]. We have disregarded the dispersion in the refractive indexes from 589 to 633 nm for the calculation of (n–nO).
19. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199712)35:17<2825::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199712)35:17<2825::AID-POLB7>3.0.CO;2-P ↗