Regulating the Sulfur Reduction Pathways with Fe 2 Mo 3 O 8 /NC Electrocatalyst
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The practical application of lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries is hindered by the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides and slow redox kinetics during the sulfur reduction reactions. Electrocatalysis has been widely employed to address these issues. However, the impact of electrocatalysts on the sulfur reduction reaction pathways and intermediate products has not been fully explored. In this work, a bimetallic oxide Fe 2 Mo 3 O 8 is prepared and embedded in C 3 N 4 ‐derived nitrogen‐doped carbon (Fe 2 Mo 3 O 8 /NC) as an electrocatalyst for Li‐S batteries. This catalyst attached on the polypropylene separator promotes the generation and consumption of Li 2 S 4 , effectively mitigating the polysulfide shuttle effect and improving output potential. Consequently, Li‐S batteries with Fe 2 Mo 3 O 8 /NC demonstrated exceptional rate performance across various current densities along with impressive cycling stability. This study highlights the role of Fe 2 Mo 3 O 8 in optimizing the sulfur reduction reaction process and offers insights into designing advanced electrocatalysts for Li‐S batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Synergistic Chem‐Bio Synthesis School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
Research Center for Carbon Capture and Utilization College of Smart Energy Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai 200240 China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jp304380j10.1021/jp304380j ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20160207110.1002/adfm.201602071 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0851610.1021/acsnano.9b08516 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20210100610.1002/adma.202101006 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20210128510.1002/adfm.202101285 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-023-06918-410.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 ↗
7. 10.1039/C8TA06040A10.1039/C8TA06040A ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20210345610.1002/advs.202103456 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20240026210.1002/adfm.202400262 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20231228810.1002/smll.202312288 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20230226710.1002/smll.202302267 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.4c1527010.1021/acsami.4c15270 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14094810.1016/j.cej.2022.140948 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20210178010.1002/aenm.202101780 ↗
15. 10.1039/C9TA11451C10.1039/C9TA11451C ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.2c0417610.1021/jacs.2c04176 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20230484710.1002/smll.202304847 ↗
18. 10.1039/D3TA07510A10.1039/D3TA07510A ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20242178010.1002/adfm.202421780 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20242335710.1002/anie.202423357 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40820-023-01299-910.1007/s40820-023-01299-9 ↗
22. 10.1007/s41918-023-00188-410.1007/s41918-023-00188-4 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20120373210.1002/adfm.201203732 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20241194110.1002/adfm.202411941 ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20240357610.1002/smll.202403576 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.2c1166310.1021/acsnano.2c11663 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20250032110.1002/adma.202500321 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10298310.1016/j.ensm.2023.102983 ↗
29. 10.1002/ange.20221193310.1002/ange.202211933 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20240081010.1002/adma.202400810 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20241910510.1002/adfm.202419105 ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.3c0721310.1021/jacs.3c07213 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.00410.1016/j.ensm.2023.03.004 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20210955210.1002/adma.202109552 ↗
35. 10.1002/advs.20220605710.1002/advs.202206057 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.10306110.1016/j.ensm.2023.103061 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.01610.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.016 ↗