Ultrathin TA‐MXene Modification Layer with Sub‐Nanometer Interlayer Channels Suppresses Polysulfide Shuttling and Accelerates Li + Desolvation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are prominent candidates for next‐generation energy storage systems owing to their exceptional theoretical energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ). Nevertheless, their practical application is hindered by the polysulfide shuttle effect, sluggish sulfur redox kinetics, and lithium dendrite growth. To mitigate these issues, an ultrathin (≈530 nm) tannic acid‐Ti 3 C 2 T x (TA‐MXene) layer is designed. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate that both TA and MXene exhibit excellent anchoring capability for lithium polysulfides. Experiments reveal that TA‐MXene's sub‐nanometer interlayer channels simultaneously suppress polysulfide migration and accelerate lithium‐ion desolvation. The resultant anion‐rich solvation structure fosters an inorganic‐rich solid electrolyte interphase formation, mitigating lithium dendrite growth. Consequently, a Li–S cell with TA‐MXene‐modified separator achieves a high specific capacity of 603.1 mAh g −1 at 4.0 C and retain 90.3% capacity after 100 cycles at 0.2 C. Notably, under high sulfur loading (3.5 mg cm −2 ) and lean electrolyte (10 µL mg S −1 ), the cells demonstrate exceptional cycling stability over 300 cycles at 0.2 C while delivering a remarkable mass/areal specific capacity of 1158.0 mAh g −1 /4.0 mAh cm −2 at 0.1 C. This work establishes a new design principle for separator modifications, demonstrating how ultrathin, lightweight architectures can integrate multifunctionality to overcome the intrinsic limitations of Li–S batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Key Laboratory of Fuel Cell for Guangdong Province School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510640 P. R. China
Department of Mechanical Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom Hong Kong 999077 P. R. China
Guangdong Provincial Research Center of Electrochemical Energy Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510640 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41929-023-01041-z10.1038/s41929-023-01041-z ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-023-06918-410.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-022-35736-x10.1038/s41467-022-35736-x ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-023-42941-910.1038/s41467-023-42941-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.01810.1016/j.joule.2018.12.018 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.12.00310.1016/j.joule.2017.12.003 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.4c0510710.1021/jacs.4c05107 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-021-24399-910.1038/s41467-021-24399-9 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0148010.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01480 ↗
10. 10.1039/D4EE02038C10.1039/D4EE02038C ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20242172610.1002/anie.202421726 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20240704210.1002/anie.202407042 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10327610.1016/j.ensm.2024.103276 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.11058510.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110585 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20220859010.1002/adma.202208590 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20230262410.1002/adfm.202302624 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20240147310.1002/adma.202401473 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20201422610.1002/anie.202014226 ↗
19. He S. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2025
20. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.01110.1016/j.joule.2020.06.011 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20221249910.1002/adfm.202212499 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10955510.1016/j.est.2023.109555 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20231050810.1002/adfm.202310508 ↗
24. 10.1002/advs.20240647510.1002/advs.202406475 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.scib.2024.03.04310.1016/j.scib.2024.03.043 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.10228910.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102289 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.5b0424510.1021/acsami.5b04245 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c0065410.1021/acs.langmuir.5c00654 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.07.00610.1016/j.ensm.2018.07.006 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10698210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.106982 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20241732110.1002/adma.202417321 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20210880110.1002/anie.202108801 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-023-40742-810.1038/s41467-023-40742-8 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41467-017-02529-610.1038/s41467-017-02529-6 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja026309v10.1021/ja026309v ↗
36. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10517410.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105174 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15228910.1016/j.cej.2024.152289 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20240443010.1002/adfm.202404430 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20210192610.1002/aenm.202101926 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.1c0867510.1021/jacs.1c08675 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20220463510.1002/adfm.202204635 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.03610.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.036 ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20190021910.1002/aenm.201900219 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.3c1073110.1021/acsnano.3c10731 ↗
45. 10.1002/aenm.20240163010.1002/aenm.202401630 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15815110.1016/j.cej.2024.158151 ↗
47. 10.1007/s40820-024-01446-w10.1007/s40820-024-01446-w ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10332810.1016/j.ensm.2024.103328 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10352910.1016/j.ensm.2024.103529 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15581710.1016/j.cej.2024.155817 ↗
51. 10.1039/D4TA01278J10.1039/D4TA01278J ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15050210.1016/j.cej.2024.150502 ↗
53. 10.20517/energymater.2023.8910.20517/energymater.2023.89 ↗
54. 10.1039/D4EE03402C10.1039/D4EE03402C ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nantod.2024.10217510.1016/j.nantod.2024.102175 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0085910.1021/acsenergylett.4c00859 ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20200375210.1002/aenm.202003752 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41557-025-01735-w10.1038/s41557-025-01735-w ↗
59. 10.1002/adma.20230737010.1002/adma.202307370 ↗
60. 10.1002/anie.20241459910.1002/anie.202414599 ↗
61. 10.1002/aenm.20230372610.1002/aenm.202303726 ↗
62. 10.1002/advs.20220744210.1002/advs.202207442 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20241991810.1002/adma.202419918 ↗
64. 10.1002/aenm.20230155110.1002/aenm.202301551 ↗
65. 10.1002/adfm.20221268910.1002/adfm.202212689 ↗