Pathways to Realize High‐Energy Density Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The transition to renewable energy is hindered by the intermittency of sources like solar and wind, necessitating advanced energy storage solutions. Aqueous redox flow batteries (ARFBs) have emerged as a promising technology for long‐duration, grid‐scale energy storage due to their advantages in safety, scalability, and independent tunability of power and energy capacities. Enhancing energy density is crucial for reducing system costs and facilitating large‐scale deployment. In this review, key parameters and strategies for boosting the energy density of ARFBs are summarized, including optimizing material solubility and electron‐transfer capabilities, developing novel redox pairs, and improving system design to reduce polarization losses. Despite significant progress, challenges remain—such as developing suitable materials, the optimal matching of electrodes, electrolytes, and membranes, and scaling systems for industrial applications. Advanced characterization tools, AI‐driven simulations, and continued research on new materials and system engineering will be essential for overcoming these barriers. With ongoing innovation, ARFBs hold tremendous promise of substantially contributing to the integration of renewable energy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue Kowloon Hong Kong 999077 China
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1147510.1038/nature11475 ↗
2. 10.1039/D2CS00765G10.1039/D2CS00765G ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11207710.1016/j.rser.2022.112077 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0104310.1021/acsenergylett.3c01043 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.121274110.1126/science.1212741 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0028910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0077310.1021/acsenergylett.4c00773 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560-020-00772-810.1038/s41560-020-00772-8 ↗
9. “Global grid‐scale battery market size by application ” can be found underhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/1339699/global‐grid‐scale‐battery‐market‐size‐by‐application/(accessed: March 2022).
10. 10.1126/science.aab159510.1126/science.aab1595 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41570-023-00506-w10.1038/s41570-023-00506-w ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.11.00310.1016/j.joule.2023.11.003 ↗
13. “Energy cost for batteries worldwide 2023 ” can be found underhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/1423073/energy‐cost‐for‐battery‐energy‐systems/(accessed: September 2023).
14. “Cost structure analysis and efficiency improvement and cost reduction route of all vanadium flow batteries‐Shenzhen ZH Energy Storage – Zhonghe VRFB – Vanadium Flow Battery Stack – Sulfur Iron Battery – PBI Non‐fluorinated Ion Exchange Membrane – Manufacturing Line Equipment – LCOS LCOE Calculator ” can be found underhttps://www.z‐henergy.com/en/article/a157(accessed: May 2022).
15. 10.1007/s40820-023-01174-710.1007/s40820-023-01174-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.nxener.2023.10004310.1016/j.nxener.2023.100043 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11179010.1016/j.est.2024.111790 ↗
18. U. S. Department of Energy · 2024
19. 10.1002/cplu.20140209910.1002/cplu.201402099 ↗
20. Bard A. J. · 2001
21. Zhang C. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2025 · 31
22. 10.1038/s41560-021-00804-x10.1038/s41560-021-00804-x ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-023-36711-w10.1038/s41467-023-36711-w ↗
24. 10.1039/D4EE05556J10.1039/D4EE05556J ↗
25. 10.1149/2.001303eel10.1149/2.001303eel ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0960710.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09607 ↗
27. 10.3390/batteries810016610.3390/batteries8100166 ↗
28. 10.1002/elan.20130032110.1002/elan.201300321 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0RA03424J10.1039/D0RA03424J ↗
30. Huskinson B. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 505 · 195
31. Sullivan P. T. · Angew Chem Int Ed · 2023 · 13
32. 10.1002/cssc.20220198410.1002/cssc.202201984 ↗
33. Cassidy J. F. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2018 · 4 · 313
34. 10.1002/aenm.20150218310.1002/aenm.201502183 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.07.01010.1016/j.joule.2021.07.010 ↗
36. Atkins P. · 2014
37. 10.1002/aenm.20110000810.1002/aenm.201100008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.01610.1016/j.joule.2022.02.016 ↗
39. 10.1149/1945-7111/ace93610.1149/1945-7111/ace936 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.01010.1016/j.joule.2018.10.010 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10121510.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101215 ↗
42. 10.1002/anie.20230466710.1002/anie.202304667 ↗
43. Zhi L. · Angew. Chem. – Int. Ed. · 2017 · 139 · 1207
44. 10.1038/s41570-022-00394-610.1038/s41570-022-00394-6 ↗
45. 10.1002/anie.20170339910.1002/anie.201703399 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0189910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01899 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.03210.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.032 ↗
48. 10.1039/C6EE00902F10.1039/C6EE00902F ↗
49. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01310.1016/j.joule.2017.08.013 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41598-018-24059-x10.1038/s41598-018-24059-x ↗
51. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.02410.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.024 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20140584010.1002/adma.201405840 ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20200856010.1002/adma.202008560 ↗
54. 10.1002/aenm.20230192910.1002/aenm.202301929 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0067910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00679 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.12662710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.126627 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsaem.3c0237010.1021/acsaem.3c02370 ↗
58. Hollas A. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 2
59. 10.1039/C7CS00569E10.1039/C7CS00569E ↗
60. 10.1126/science.aab303310.1126/science.aab3033 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.02110.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.021 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0129610.1021/acsenergylett.8b01296 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20140374610.1002/adma.201403746 ↗
64. 10.1002/aenm.20150144910.1002/aenm.201501449 ↗
65. Janoschka T. · Joule · 2016 · 55
66. 10.1021/jacs.6b1098410.1021/jacs.6b10984 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.00110.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.001 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.03210.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.032 ↗
69. 10.1126/science.abd979510.1126/science.abd9795 ↗
70. 10.1038/s41560-018-0167-310.1038/s41560-018-0167-3 ↗
71. 10.1002/adma.20190105210.1002/adma.201901052 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.01410.1016/j.joule.2018.05.014 ↗
73. 10.1002/aenm.20190003910.1002/aenm.201900039 ↗
74. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0073910.1021/acsenergylett.9b00739 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22998410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229984 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0130210.1021/acsenergylett.7b01302 ↗
77. Ji Y. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 168
78. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0001910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00019 ↗
79. 10.1002/cssc.20200038110.1002/cssc.202000381 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.02010.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.020 ↗
81. 10.1038/s41560-021-00879-610.1038/s41560-021-00879-6 ↗
82. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0155010.1021/acsenergylett.4c01550 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23045710.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230457 ↗
84. 10.1002/aenm.20110015210.1002/aenm.201100152 ↗
85. 10.1039/D0SE00675K10.1039/D0SE00675K ↗
86. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.00710.1016/j.joule.2019.06.007 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23144210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231442 ↗
88. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0003210.1021/acsenergylett.2c00032 ↗
89. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0016510.1021/acsenergylett.2c00165 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.coche.2022.10083410.1016/j.coche.2022.100834 ↗
91. 10.1002/adma.20180240610.1002/adma.201802406 ↗
92. Gao M. · J. Power Sources · 2023 · 2
93. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.05810.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.058 ↗
94. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0193910.1021/acsenergylett.9b01939 ↗
95. 10.1002/anie.20200460310.1002/anie.202004603 ↗
96. 10.1002/adma.20210456210.1002/adma.202104562 ↗
97. 10.1002/cssc.20230071010.1002/cssc.202300710 ↗
98. 10.1002/adma.20220939010.1002/adma.202209390 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.04810.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.048 ↗
100. 10.1038/s41467-023-41071-610.1038/s41467-023-41071-6 ↗