Microstructurally resolved modeling of all solid-state batteries: Latest progresses, opportunities, and challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
All solid-state batteries are promising high-energy-density storage devices. To optimize their performance without costly trial and error approaches, microstructure-resolved continuum models have been proposed to understand the influence of the electrode architecture on their capabilities. We discuss the recent advances in the microstructure-resolved modeling of solid-state batteries. While not all of the experimentally observed phenomena can be accurately represented, these models generally agree that the low ionic conductivity of the solid electrolyte is a limiting factor. We conclude by highlighting the need for microstructure-resolved models of degradation mechanisms, manufacturing effects and artificial intelligence approaches speeding up the optimization of interfaces in all solid-state-battery electrodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
2. Toward high performance all-solid-state lithium batteries with high-voltage cathode materials: design strategies for solid electrolytes, cathode interfaces, and composite electrodes10.1002/aenm.202003154 ↗
3. From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x ↗
4. Electrode design methodology for all-solid-state batteries: 3D structural analysis and performance prediction10.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.012 ↗
5. Transport and mechanical aspects of all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100679 ↗
6. A review on 3D structure formation, analysis and performance prediction technique for all-solid-state electrode and battery
7. Modeling all-solid-state Li-ion batteries10.1149/1.3521414 ↗
8. Charge/discharge simulation of an all-solid-state thin-film battery using a one-dimensional model10.1149/2.041202jes ↗
9. Micro-modelling of solid oxide fuel cell electrodes10.1016/S0013-4686(97)00063-7 ↗
10. Microstructural modeling for prediction of transport properties and electrochemical performance in SOFC composite electrodes10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.032 ↗
11. Importance of anode microstructure in modeling solid oxide fuel cells10.1149/1.2898206 ↗
12. A particle-based model for predicting the effective conductivities of composite electrodes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.013 ↗
13. Modeling of chemo-mechanical multi-particle interactions in composite electrodes for liquid and solid-state Li-ion batteries10.1149/1945-7111/abe8ea ↗
14. High capacity garnet-based all-solid-state lithium batteries: fabrication and 3D-microstructure resolved modeling10.1021/acsami.8b06705 ↗
15. Analysis of interfacial effects in all-solid-state batteries with thiophosphate solid electrolytes10.1021/acsami.9b21404 ↗
16. Three-dimensional modeling of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries using synchrotron transmission X-ray microscopy tomography10.1149/1945-7111/ab9380 ↗
17. Simulation for all-solid state batteries with multi-element network model10.1051/matecconf/202133317002 ↗
18. A versatile and efficient voxelization-based meshing algorithm of multiple phases10.1021/acsomega.9b01279 ↗
19. Microstructural modeling of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11043 ↗
20. Modeling effective ionic conductivity and binder influence in composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1021/acsami.9b22788 ↗
21. Lithium ion battery electrodes predicted from manufacturing simulations: assessing the impact of the carbon-binder spatial location on the electrochemical performance10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227285 ↗
22. Influence of lithium ion kinetics, particle morphology and voids on the electrochemical performance of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries10.1149/1945-7111/ac50df ↗
23. Effect of positive electrode microstructure in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery on high-rate discharge capability10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115079 ↗
24. Suppression of phase separation in LiFePO4 nanoparticles during battery discharge10.1021/nl202764f ↗
25. Effect of mold pressure on compaction and ion conductivity of all-solid-state batteries revealed by the discrete element method10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230344 ↗
26. Simulation of fabrication and degradation of all-solid-state batteries with ductile particles10.1149/1945-7111/abed23 ↗
27. Evaluation of elastic modulus of Li2S–P2S5 glassy solid electrolyte by ultrasonic sound velocity measurement and compression test
28. Sulfide solid electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery10.1038/srep02261 ↗
29. Atomic-scale influence of grain boundaries on Li-ion conduction in solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries10.1021/jacs.7b10593 ↗
30. Grain boundary analysis of the garnet-like oxides Li 7+X-Y La 3-X A X Zr 2-Y Nb Y O 12 (A = Sr or Ca)10.3389/fenrg.2016.00030 ↗
31. Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or reality?10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00108 ↗
32. How machine learning will revolutionize electrochemical sciences10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00194 ↗
33. Accelerated materials design of lithium superionic conductors based on first-principles calculations and machine learning algorithms10.1002/aenm.201300060 ↗
34. Text mining assisted review of the literature on Li-O2 batteries
35. Data-driven smart charging for heterogeneous electric vehicle fleets10.1016/j.egyai.2020.100007 ↗
36. Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 ↗
37. Machine-learning-revealed statistics of the particle-carbon/binder detachment in lithium-ion battery cathodes
38. An efficient screening method for retired lithium-ion batteries based on support vector machine10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121882 ↗
39. Artificial intelligence investigation of NMC cathode manufacturing parameters interdependencies10.1002/batt.201900135 ↗
40. Accelerated optimization methods for force-field parametrization in battery electrode manufacturing modeling10.1002/batt.202000049 ↗
41. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8 ↗
42. Annotating and extracting synthesis process of all-solid-state batteries from scientific literature
43. What can text mining tell us about lithium-ion battery researchers' habits?10.1002/batt.202000288 ↗
44. Manufacturing scalability implications of materials choice in inorganic solid-state batteries10.1016/j.joule.2020.12.001 ↗
45. Post-lithium-ion battery cell production and its compatibility with lithium-ion cell production infrastructure10.1038/s41560-020-00748-8 ↗
46. Scalable processing routes for the production of all-solid-state batteries—modeling interdependencies of product and process10.1002/ente.202000665 ↗
47. The ARTISTIC online calculator: exploring the impact of lithium-ion battery electrode manufacturing parameters interactively through your browser
48. Tracking variabilities in the simulation of Lithium Ion Battery electrode fabrication and its impact on electrochemical performance10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.110 ↗
49. Multiscale simulation platform linking lithium ion battery electrode fabrication process with performance at the cell level10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02647 ↗
50. Carbon-binder migration: a three-dimensional drying model for lithium-ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.ensm.2021.09.015 ↗
51. Ngandjong
52. Experimentally validated three-dimensional modeling of organic-based sodium-ion battery electrode manufacturing10.1002/batt.202200116 ↗
53. Insight on electrolyte infiltration of lithium ion battery electrodes by means of a new three-dimensional-resolved lattice Boltzmann model10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.029 ↗
54. Designing electrode architectures to facilitate electrolyte infiltration for lithium-ion batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.049 ↗
55. 4D-resolved physical model for Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy of Li(Ni1-x-yMnxCoy)O2-based cathodes in symmetric cells: consequences in tortuosity calculations10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227871 ↗
56. Deconvoluting the impacts of the active material skeleton and the inactive phase morphology on the performance of lithium ion battery electrodes10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.016 ↗
57. Deconvoluting the benefits of porosity distribution in layered electrodes on the electrochemical performance of Li-ion batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.058 ↗
58. Heterogeneous solid-electrolyte interphase in graphite electrodes assessed by 4D-resolved computational simulations10.1002/batt.202100030 ↗
59. Data-driven assessment of electrode calendering process by combining experimental results, in silico mesostructures generation and machine learning10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229103 ↗
60. Machine learning-based assessment of the impact of the manufacturing process on battery electrode heterogeneity10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100090 ↗
61. Duquesnoy
62. Fabrication of high-quality thin solid-state electrolyte films assisted by machine learning10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00332 ↗
63. Perspectives on manufacturing simulations of Li-S battery cathodes
64. Alabdali · 2022