Enhanced Longevity of Lithium Metal Anodes via Fluorine/Nitrogen Co‐Doped Lightweight 3D Carbon Porous Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Lithium metal anodes suffer from uncontrollable volume expansion during electrochemical cycling due to the host‐free nature of lithium deposition, leading to reduced Coulombic efficiency (CE) and shortened cycle life. In this work, a fluorine‐functionalized surface modification (FCMF) is applied to carbonized melamine foam (CMF) using a secondary chemical vapor deposition process, forming an amorphous nitrogen/fluorine co‐doped carbon layer ≈65 nm thick. The FCMF exhibits an exceptionally low areal density of 2.43 mg cm⁻ 2 , which is only 28.5% of that of commercial 8 µm copper foil. Fluorine doping significantly enhances the lithium‐ion affinity of the substrate, facilitating uniform lithium deposition throughout the 3D framework. This results in an ultrahigh average CE (99.78% for FCMF vs 99.44% for CMF) and substantially improves symmetric cell cycling performance (2450 h vs 745 h). Additionally, the LiFePO 4 (single‐side, 11.9 mg cm − 2 ) | FCMF/Li full cell maintains over 400 cycles with 85.6% capacity retention at 2C. This work introduces a scalable chemical vapor deposition method for producing high‐performance 3D current collectors for lithium metal batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy Central South University Changsha 410083 P. R. China
Dyson School of Design Engineering Imperial College London London SW7 2BX UK
Foshan Lifriend New Energy Co. LTD Foshan 528244 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Lin X. · Mater. Today · 2024
2. Liao J. · J. Power Sources · 2025 · 635
3. 10.1007/s12274-023-5795-710.1007/s12274-023-5795-7 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20220374410.1002/aenm.202203744 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.etran.2024.10033010.1016/j.etran.2024.100330 ↗
6. Yuan H. · Mater. Today · 2022 · 53
7. 10.1002/advs.20210111110.1002/advs.202101111 ↗
8. 10.1039/D1TA02951G10.1039/D1TA02951G ↗
9. Zhang Y. · Mater. Today · 2020 · 33
10. Tang W. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2024 · 64
11. 10.1002/adma.20241525810.1002/adma.202415258 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20220001010.1002/smll.202200010 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20230073410.1002/smll.202300734 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20230437310.1002/smll.202304373 ↗
15. Zhou B. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2022 · 130
16. Li N. · Mater. Today Energy · 2023 · 36
17. Zhang X. · J. Power Sources · 2025 · 631
18. 10.1007/s42114-023-00769-310.1007/s42114-023-00769-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.esci.2024.10027110.1016/j.esci.2024.100271 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20240764810.1002/adma.202407648 ↗
21. Pathak R. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 41
22. Zhong G. · Carbon · 2024 · 228
23. Ouyang Y. · Carbon · 2024 · 229
24. 10.1002/aenm.20230256510.1002/aenm.202302565 ↗
25. 10.1002/eom2.1226910.1002/eom2.12269 ↗
26. Yang G.‐D. · Chem. Eng. J. · 2024 · 492
27. Wang K. · Energy · 2023 · 275
28. 10.1002/adfm.20230346610.1002/adfm.202303466 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0181410.1021/acsaem.1c01814 ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20240443710.1002/smll.202404437 ↗
31. 10.1002/batt.20230024610.1002/batt.202300246 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20230867810.1002/smll.202308678 ↗
33. 10.1039/D2TA08772C10.1039/D2TA08772C ↗
34. 10.1039/C7TA07902H10.1039/C7TA07902H ↗
35. Huang J. · Electrochim. Acta · 2018 · 281
36. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0403410.1021/acscatal.4c04034 ↗
37. Liu Y. · Nano Energy · 2022 · 94
38. Qian Y. · J. Power Sources · 2016 · 332
39. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0304210.1021/acsnano.0c03042 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41929-022-00804-410.1038/s41929-022-00804-4 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20220251810.1002/aenm.202202518 ↗