journal article·2025-11Open access

Defect‐Induced Selectivity Modulation Using Copper Triazole Molecular Frameworks for Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction

Anirudha Shekhawat, Debanjan Das, Ridha Zerdoumi, Muhammad Adib Abdillah Mahbub, Bashir Eid, Shubhadeep Chandra, Sabine Seisel, Wolfgang Schuhmann

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 35· Issue 48

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are considered promising electrocatalytic materials due to their adjustable coordination bonds between metal ions and organic ligands. The abundance of metal centers within MOFs offers potential active sites. However, the limited availability of adsorption sites in the case of fully coordinated metal ions might lead to insufficient electrocatalytic activity. The selectivity is tuned during the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (eCO 2 RR) using Cu‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazole MOF from C 1 products to C 2+ products by generating defects to enable a local increase in CO * coverage, thus improving eCO 2 RR performance. The catalyst exhibits ≈78.4% of total Faradaic efficiency for C 2+ products at −200 mA cm −2 current density in 1.0 m KOH as electrolyte.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Analytical Chemistry‐Center for Electrochemical Sciences (CES) Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry Ruhr University Bochum Universitätsstr. 150 D‐44780 Bochum Germany

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/environments1004006610.3390/environments10040066 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0019610.1021/acsaem.4c00196 ↗
3. 10.1039/D4NR00824C10.1039/D4NR00824C ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12882510.1016/j.cej.2021.128825 ↗
5. 10.1002/cctc.20240060110.1002/cctc.202400601 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.21533310.1016/j.ccr.2023.215333 ↗
7. 10.1039/D3CY00408B10.1039/D3CY00408B ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0047110.1021/acsaem.2c00471 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10435310.1016/j.surfin.2024.104353 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.10.00310.1016/j.mtener.2018.10.003 ↗
11. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0168110.1021/acscatal.2c01681 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.9b1112610.1021/jacs.9b11126 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.8b0640710.1021/jacs.8b06407 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.05510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.055 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20200038510.1002/anie.202000385 ↗
16. 10.1021/ar000034b10.1021/ar000034b ↗
17. 10.1039/C9CS00609E10.1039/C9CS00609E ↗
18. 10.1039/C8RE00228B10.1039/C8RE00228B ↗
19. 10.1002/chem.20120182010.1002/chem.201201820 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20046278710.1002/anie.200462787 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.11994110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119941 ↗
22. 10.1002/elsa.20210020010.1002/elsa.202100200 ↗
23. 10.34133/research.000810.34133/research.0008 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20210534310.1002/anie.202105343 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20230775210.1002/adfm.202307752 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscentsci.3c0082610.1021/acscentsci.3c00826 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41565-022-01286-y10.1038/s41565-022-01286-y ↗
28. 10.1039/c2dt12311h10.1039/c2dt12311h ↗
29. 10.31635/ccschem.023.20230329810.31635/ccschem.023.202303298 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c0056710.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00567 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7CP00241F10.1039/C7CP00241F ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0391010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03910 ↗
33. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0155210.1021/acscatal.8b01552 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20170058010.1002/anie.201700580 ↗
35. 10.1039/D1SC05441D10.1039/D1SC05441D ↗
36. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0060910.1021/acscatal.2c00609 ↗
37. 10.1073/pnas.170240511410.1073/pnas.1702405114 ↗