Recent progress in physical and mathematical modelling of electrochemically assisted soil remediation processes
Source abstract
Abstract
This work reviews the recent progress in physical and mathematical modelling of electrochemically assisted soil remediation processes and focuses especially on those treatments that aim to remove organic pollution. It introduces the importance of modelling and simulation, not only to understand, but also to manage more efficiently the remediation of polluted sites. Special emphasis is taken in the information generated in the last five to ten years, trying to shed light on how the understanding of these treatments has improved in this period. To do this, two different sections introduce the main challenges in mathematical and physical modelling, merging in a final section, that shows the expected future trends in electrochemically assisted soil remediation modelling. Regarding physical modelling, the size of the installation used in the study and the novelty of the application of the technology have been used as the key inputs for this review. Regarding mathematical modelling, the inputs used to conduct the review have been the typology of numerical code, the processes included in the model and the way in which the electrolyte is considered in the model. Final remarks highlight the importance that modeling will take in the near future to increase the technology readiness level of these treatments and to promote their massive application to the remediation of polluted sites.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Advanced oxidation water treatment · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. A multi-layered view of chemical and biochemical engineering10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.008 ↗
2. Highlights during the development of electrochemical engineering10.1016/j.cherd.2013.08.029 ↗
3. Single and coupled electrochemical processes and reactors for the abatement of organic water pollutants: a critical review10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00361 ↗
4. Removal of nitrates from spiked clay soils by coupling electrokinetic and permeable reactive barrier technologies10.1002/jctb.4488 ↗
5. Removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol from spiked clay soils by electrokinetic soil flushing assisted with granular activated carbon permeable reactive barrier10.1021/ie4028022 ↗
6. Removal of oxyfluorfen from spiked soils using electrokinetic soil flushing with the surrounding arrangements of electrodes10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.174 ↗
7. Removal of oxyfluorfen from spiked soils using electrokinetic soil flushing with linear rows of electrodes10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.112 ↗
8. Electrokinetic flushing with surrounding electrode arrangements for the remediation of soils that are polluted with 2,4-D: a case study in a pilot plant10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.065 ↗
9. Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides. Part I: some notes about the transport of inorganic species10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.113 ↗
10. Scale-up of the electrokinetic fence technology for the removal of pesticides. Part II: does size matter for removal of herbicides?10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.114 ↗
11. Scale-up on electrokinetic remediation: engineering and technological parameters10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.012 ↗
12. Electrochemically assisted remediation of pesticides in soils and water: a review10.1021/cr500077e ↗
13. Scale-up of electrokinetic permeable reactive barriers for the removal of organochlorine herbicide from spiked soils10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126078 ↗
14. Combining nanoscale zero-valent iron with electrokinetic treatment for remediation of chlorinated ethenes and promoting biodegradation: a long-term field study10.1016/j.watres.2020.115692 ↗
15. Electrokinetically-enhanced emplacement of lactate in a chlorinated solvent contaminated clay site to promote bioremediation10.1016/j.watres.2021.117305 ↗
16. Electro-bioremediation at the prototype scale: what it should be learned for the scale-up10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.172 ↗
17. Electrokinetic-enhanced bioaugmentation for remediation of chlorinated solvents contaminated clay10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.001 ↗
18. Challenges in electrochemical remediation of chlorinated solvents in natural groundwater aquifer settings10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.064 ↗
19. Field test of electrokinetically-delivered thermally activated persulfate for remediation of chlorinated solvents in clay10.1016/j.watres.2020.116061 ↗
20. Combining electrokinetic transport and bioremediation for enhanced removal of crude oil from contaminated marine sediments: results of a long-term, mesocosm-scale experiment10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.094 ↗
21. Toward a more sustainable mining future with electrokinetic in situ leaching10.1126/sciadv.abf9971 ↗
22. Effective remediation of heavy metals in contaminated soil by electrokinetic technology incorporating reactive filter media10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148668 ↗
23. Electrokinetic-enhanced permanganate delivery and remediation of contaminated low permeability porous media10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.005 ↗
24. Testing different strategies for the remediation of soils polluted with lindane10.1016/j.cej.2019.122674 ↗
25. Scale-up of electrokinetic permeable reactive barriers for the removal of organochlorine herbicide from spiked soils10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126078 ↗
26. Enhancing the removal of atrazine from soils by electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.216 ↗
27. Electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of atrazine: differences between electrode and interelectrode soil sections10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.064 ↗
28. Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies: a review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123345 ↗
29. Electrokinetic techniques, their enhancement techniques and composite techniques with other processes for persistent organic pollutants remediation in soil: a review10.1016/j.jiec.2021.03.009 ↗
30. Renewable energies driven electrochemical wastewater/soil decontamination technologies: a critical review of fundamental concepts and applications
31. Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: a critical review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008 ↗
32. ZVI – reactive barriers for the remediation of soils polluted with clopyralid: are they really Worth?10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.142 ↗
33. Effect of electric field on the performance of soil electro-bioremediation with a periodic polarity reversal strategy10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.053 ↗
34. Influence of electric field on the remediation of polluted soil using a biobarrier assisted electro-bioremediation process10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.133 ↗
35. Electrokinetic remediation of soil polluted with insoluble organics using biological permeable reactive barriers: effect of periodic polarity reversal and voltage gradient10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.049 ↗
36. Prescale-up of electro-bioremediation processes
37. Biostimulation versus bioaugmentation for the electro-bioremediation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid polluted soils
38. Barba · 2020 · 20
39. Improvement of the electro-bioremediation process of a non-polar herbicide-polluted soil by means of surfactant addition10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.338 ↗
40. Strategies for the electrobioremediation of oxyfluorfen polluted soils10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.195 ↗
41. Electrobioremediation of oxyfluorfen-polluted soil by means of a fixed-bed permeable biological barrier10.1007/s11270-019-4183-0 ↗
42. Fixed-bed biological barrier coupled with electrokinetics for the in situ electrobioremediation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid polluted soil10.1002/jctb.6079 ↗
43. Can electro-bioremediation of polluted soils perform as a self-sustainable process?10.1007/s10800-018-1172-8 ↗
44. Effect of the polarity reversal frequency in the electrokinetic-biological remediation of oxyfluorfen polluted soil10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.002 ↗
45. Electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of atrazine: differences between electrode and interelectrode soil sections10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.064 ↗
46. Conceptual and mathematical modeling of the transport of pollutants in soil by electric fields
47. An overview of the modeling of electrokinetic remediation
48. Experimental and Numerical studies on remediation of mixed metal-contaminated sediments by electrokinetics focusing on fractionation changes10.1007/s10661-021-09064-4 ↗
49. Electrokinetic propagation of acid and base fronts in clayey soil: an experimental and numerical study10.1007/s11242-020-01457-2 ↗
50. Transient reactive transport model for physico-chemical transformation by electrochemical reactive barriers10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.051 ↗
51. Numerical assessment of Electrokinetic Barrier with coupled flow modeling approach
52. A simplified model to simulate ionic transport by electrokinetics in soil
53. An implicit finite difference model for electrokinetic remediation of Cd-spiked kaolinite under acid-enhanced and unenhanced conditions10.1007/s10666-018-9610-x ↗
54. Modeling of electrokinetic remediation of Cd- and Pb-contaminated kaolinite10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.034 ↗
55. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation and simulation of cadmium-contaminated soil by superimposed electric field10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.233 ↗
56. Numerical evaluation of voltage gradient constraints on electrokinetic injection of amendments10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.004 ↗
57. Pore-scale modeling of electrokinetics in geomaterials10.1007/s11242-021-01581-7 ↗
58. Multiphysics modeling of electrokinetic phenomena in unsaturated fine–grained soils
59. Modeling of electrokinetic processes by finite element integration of the Nernst-Planck-Poisson system of equations10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.023 ↗
60. A generalized model for transport of contaminants in soil by electric fields
61. Modeling of electrokinetic desalination of bricks10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.132 ↗
62. Simulation-based analysis of the differences in the removal rate of chlorides, nitrates and sulfates by electrokinetic desalination treatments10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.087 ↗
63. Electrochemical desalination of bricks – experimental and modeling10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.041 ↗
64. Numerical prediction of diffusion and electric field-induced iron nanoparticle transport10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.157 ↗
65. Miao · 2015 · 226
66. Appelo
67. Solute transport solved with the Nernst-Planck equation for concrete pores with ‘free’ water and a double layer10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.030 ↗
68. Numerical study of the influence of electrode arrangements in electrokinetic remediation technique10.1007/s11356-017-0017-z ↗
69. Multiphysics implementation of electrokinetic remediation models for natural soils and porewaters10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.102 ↗
70. Effect of polarity reversal on the enhanced electrokinetic remediation of 2,4-D-polluted soils: a numerical study10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.077 ↗
71. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of polluted soils by anolyte pH conditioning10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.038 ↗
72. Water transport in electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated kaolinite. Experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.009 ↗
73. Calcite buffer effects in electrokinetic remediation of clopyralid-polluted soils10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.034 ↗
74. Multiphysics for ElectroKinetic remediation of polluted soils
75. Multispecies reactive transport modelling of electrokinetic remediation of harbour sediments10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.12.032 ↗
76. Model-based optimization of field-scale electrokinetic treatment of dredged sediments10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.004 ↗
77. Electroremediation of sodium bentonite contaminated with phenanthrene and its modeling with a Nernst-Planck equation10.1007/s10800-018-1219-x ↗
78. Modeling of electrokinetic remediation combining local chemical equilibrium and chemical reaction kinetics10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.014 ↗
79. Modeling electrokinetic transport and biogeochemical reactions in porous media: a multidimensional Nernst–Planck–Poisson approach with PHREEQC coupling10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.03.011 ↗
80. Charge interactions, reaction kinetics and dimensionality effects on electrokinetic remediation: a model-based analysis10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103567 ↗
81. Process-based modeling of electrokinetic-enhanced bioremediation of chlorinated ethenes10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122787 ↗
82. Electrokinetic delivery of reactants: pore water chemistry controls transport, mixing, and degradation10.1021/acs.est.0c06054 ↗
83. Integrating process-based reactive transport modeling and machine learning for electrokinetic remediation of contaminated groundwater10.1029/2021WR029959 ↗
84. On the interplay between electromigration and electroosmosis during electrokinetic transport in heterogeneous porous media10.1016/j.watres.2022.118161 ↗
85. Impact of solute charge and diffusion coefficient on electromigration and mixing in porous media10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103933 ↗
86. Smith · 1986
87. Thomas · 1995
88. Zienkiewicz · 2013
89. Applied mathematics at the U.S. Department of energy: past, present and a view to the future
90. Multiphysics simulations: challenges and opportunities10.1177/1094342012468181 ↗
91. A survey of open source multiphysics frameworks in engineering
92. Modules based on the geochemical model PHREEQC for use in scripting and programming languages10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.005 ↗
93. PhreeqcRM: a reaction module for transport simulators based on the geochemical model PHREEQC10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.001 ↗
94. Analytical investigation of electroosmotic consolidation in unsaturated soils considering the coupling effect and a nonuniform initial water content10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002053 ↗
95. Influence of degree of compaction on electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soil10.1007/s11814-021-0999-6 ↗
96. Müller · 2015
97. Enhanced engineering characteristics of soils by electro-osmotic treatment: an overview10.1007/s10706-019-00973-3 ↗
98. Geotechnical behaviour of low-permeability soils in surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation10.1080/10934529.2015.1079106 ↗
99. Cleaning contaminated soil using electrical heating and air stripping10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1995)121:8(580) ↗
100. Electro-Thermal Dynamic Stripping Process for in situ remediation under an occupied apartment building10.1002/rem.10075 ↗