Structural and Functional Optimization of Lithium‐Sulfur Battery Separators by Sulfur‐Containing of Covalent Organic Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The polysulfide shuttle effect and growth of lithium dendrites are major challenges for the development of high‐performance lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries. In this work, a thiazole‐based covalent organic framework (TTT‐COF) is designed to modify the separators and provide an efficient strategy to tackle these challenges. A series of chemical structural analyses and electrochemical tests reveal that the modification of the linkages in TTT‐COF enhances π‐electron delocalization, with the active sites predominantly activated by the introduced adjacent heteroatoms via electronic effects. This not only facilitates the electrocatalytic conversion of polysulfides but also enhances lithium‐ion (Li + )/electron migration, thus alleviating the formation of lithium dendrites. The experimental results demonstrate that the modified battery exhibits an initial specific capacity of 987.3 mA h g −1 at a current density of 1.0 C, with a specific capacity decay rate of just 0.082% per cycle after 800 cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Polymer Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymer Materials Sichuan University Chengdu 610065 China
Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory University of Oxford Oxford OX1 3TA UK
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.01710.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.017 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20200077910.1002/aenm.202000779 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5CS00410A10.1039/C5CS00410A ↗
4. 10.1039/C9CS00635D10.1039/C9CS00635D ↗
5. 10.1038/s41570-020-0160-910.1038/s41570-020-0160-9 ↗
6. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.13210.1038/nenergy.2016.132 ↗
7. 10.1039/D0EE02797A10.1039/D0EE02797A ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.03210.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.032 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.02010.1016/j.joule.2020.03.020 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.01110.1016/j.joule.2020.06.011 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20221541410.1002/anie.202215414 ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20230699110.1002/smll.202306991 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20240974810.1002/adfm.202409748 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20210424610.1002/adma.202104246 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-022-01001-010.1038/s41560-022-01001-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00310.1016/j.joule.2019.01.003 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20231424610.1002/adfm.202314246 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.112041110.1126/science.1120411 ↗
19. 10.1038/s44160-021-00005-010.1038/s44160-021-00005-0 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0036910.1021/acs.accounts.5b00369 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.02810.1016/j.matt.2024.01.028 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20210050510.1002/adfm.202100505 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-022-33875-910.1038/s41467-022-33875-9 ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20231201610.1002/anie.202312016 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20220433410.1002/aenm.202204334 ↗
26. 10.1002/anie.20210638910.1002/anie.202106389 ↗
27. 10.1002/anie.20230948010.1002/anie.202309480 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.02.03810.1016/j.jcis.2024.02.038 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20180990710.1002/anie.201809907 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0094310.1021/acsenergylett.1c00943 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20160125010.1002/aenm.201601250 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20190524510.1002/adma.201905245 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20230227610.1002/anie.202302276 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20201666710.1002/anie.202016667 ↗
35. 10.1039/C8CS00978C10.1039/C8CS00978C ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.0c0341810.1021/jacs.0c03418 ↗