Piezoelectric Ceramic Hardening Through Defect Distribution Optimization in Multicomponent Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Acceptor doping is a common method for hardening modified piezoelectric ceramics. The mechanism through which the hardening effect can be improved has been widely studied and verified. However, the effect of defects caused by different valence states of the B‐site ions on the properties of multicomponent piezoelectric ceramics remains to be discussed. Therefore, in this work, a novel Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mn1/3Nb1/2)–PbTiO3 quaternary hard ceramic with excellent performance is prepared and studied. The interaction between grain‐boundary defects and defect dipoles is proposed to be the mechanism behind the observed excellent performance. It is found that different types of defects improve the hardening effect in various ways. These results can provide a theoretical basis for the preparation of multicomponent piezoelectric ceramics with better properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology Xidian University 266 Xinglong, Section of Xifeng Road Xi'an 710126 P. R. China
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of High‐Orbits‐Electron Materials and Protection Technology for Aerospace(HMP) Xidian University 266 Xinglong Section of Xifeng Road Xi'an 710126 P. R. China
Electronic Materials Research Laboratory (Key Lab of Education Ministry) State Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials and School of Electronic Science and Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 P. R. China
School of Physics Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.24310.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.243 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac868710.1088/1361-6463/ac8687 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.06710.1016/j.petrol.2017.08.067 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.03010.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.030 ↗
5. Wang Y. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 5999
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.03410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.034 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00847.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00847.x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.05410.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.054 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.24610.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.246 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11664-023-10261-910.1007/s11664-023-10261-9 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.01410310.1103/PhysRevB.63.014103 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.18410710.1103/PhysRevB.75.184107 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R1396110.1103/PhysRevB.57.R13961 ↗
14. 10.1080/0015019830800905610.1080/00150198308009056 ↗
15. 10.2138/am-1998-3-41410.2138/am-1998-3-414 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.15910.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.159 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.07.01910.1016/j.electacta.2019.07.019 ↗
20. 10.1143/JJAP.33.195910.1143/JJAP.33.1959 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.09110.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.091 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.02310.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.09.06510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.09.065 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.312670710.1063/1.3126707 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20220255810.1002/adma.202202558 ↗
26. 10.1002/aelm.20220060910.1002/aelm.202200609 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.05010.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.050 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.04210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.042 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.04710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.047 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.11110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.111 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.05610.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.056 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.01210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.012 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.15710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.157 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.03010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.07.030 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.03010.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.030 ↗
36. 10.1088/1757-899X/634/1/01202110.1088/1757-899X/634/1/012021 ↗
37. 10.1143/JJAP.44.704210.1143/JJAP.44.7042 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.physb.2011.11.04810.1016/j.physb.2011.11.048 ↗
39. 10.1080/00150193.2017.137529810.1080/00150193.2017.1375298 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.05710.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.057 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11672010.1016/j.actamat.2021.116720 ↗
42. 10.1038/nature2206810.1038/nature22068 ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20200682310.1002/adfm.202006823 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apt.2016.04.00810.1016/j.apt.2016.04.008 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.15710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.157 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.10710.1016/j.ceramint.2021.07.107 ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20200501210.1002/adfm.202005012 ↗
48. Erhart P. · Phys. Rev. B. · 2013 · 88 · 3605
49. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.07.06710.1016/j.solener.2020.07.067 ↗
50. b)A.Sharma S.Basu N.Gupta presented atDetection of Charge around a nanoparticle in a Nanocomposition Using Electrostatic Force Microscopy IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 272020 pp.866–872 https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2020.008791;10.1109/TDEI.2020.008791 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.096102 ↗
52. 10.1021/nl050176510.1021/nl0501765 ↗
53. 10.1021/jp026543810.1021/jp0265438 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11464610.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114646 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.13760210.1103/PhysRevLett.120.137602 ↗
56. 10.1093/jmicro/dfac04510.1093/jmicro/dfac045 ↗
57. 10.1093/jmicro/dfaa07010.1093/jmicro/dfaa070 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.11303310.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113033 ↗
59. 10.1093/jmicro/dfae01910.1093/jmicro/dfae019 ↗