journal article·2024-11

Effects of Graphene Doping on the Electrical Conductivity of Copper

Chenmu Zhang, Zhongcan Xiao, Rachel Paddock, Michael Cullinan, Mehran Tehrani, Yuanyue Liu

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 34· Issue 45
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract There is great interest in developing advanced electrical conductors with higher conductivity, lighter weight, and higher mechanical strength than copper (Cu). One promising candidate is copper‐graphene (Cu‐Gr) composite, which is hypothesized to have a higher electrical conductivity than Cu. In this work, it is shown that this is not true, supported by state‐of‐the‐art first‐principles calculations of electron transport. Particularly, contrary to the belief that graphene in the composite is more conductive than pristine Cu, it is less conductive due to increased scattering despite increased carrier concentration. On the other hand, it is found that compressive strain along the (111) plane increases the conductivity, which is confirmed experimentally, while tensile strain has little effect. The work offers new insights into understanding and developing advanced conductors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Texas Materials Institute and Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

Department of Structural Engineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA 92093 USA

Program in Materials Science and Engineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA 92093 USA

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pssa.20200070410.1002/pssa.202000704 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl504889t10.1021/nl504889t ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0166410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01664 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl404719n10.1021/nl404719n ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.16541010.1103/PhysRevB.87.165410 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep4189610.1038/srep41896 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0106710.1021/acsnano.5b01067 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20130249510.1002/adma.201302495 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20180679210.1002/adfm.201806792 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20210420810.1002/adma.202104208 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12540-015-5058-610.1007/s12540-015-5058-6 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1872-5805(19)60009-010.1016/S1872-5805(19)60009-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.06910.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.069 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.35710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.357 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.03910.1016/j.msea.2015.12.039 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.02310.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.08910.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.089 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep1936310.1038/srep19363 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.370170110.1116/1.3701701 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20220119210.1002/adem.202201192 ↗
21. 10.1063/5.013708610.1063/5.0137086 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.4c0103310.1021/acsnano.4c01033 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f7910.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.723110.1103/PhysRevB.43.7231 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.16510810.1103/PhysRevB.76.165108 ↗
28. 10.1137/17M112969610.1137/17M1129696 ↗
29. 10.1021/ct500985f10.1021/ct500985f ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.17770110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.177701 ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.140672111110.1073/pnas.1406721111 ↗
32. 10.1039/D3CP04553F10.1039/D3CP04553F ↗
33. 10.1063/1.32534410.1063/1.325344 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cartre.2022.10022910.1016/j.cartre.2022.100229 ↗