journal article·2024-11Open access

Low‐Cost Tin Oxide Transparent Conductive Films for Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells

Jiacheng Guo, Shuhan Li, Yuhan Cui, Yurong Zhou, Wanwu Guo, Yan Hu, Yansi Xing, Yuqin Zhou, Fengzhen Liu

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 34· Issue 45

Abstract

Abstract Indium‐based transparent conductive oxide (TCO) films are widely used in various photoelectric devices including silicon heterojunction (SHJ) solar cells. However, high cost of indium‐based TCO films is not conducive to mass production of the SHJ solar cells. A variety of indium‐free or indium‐less TCOs are explored and utilized presently. Here, SnOx films are deposited by reactive plasma deposition (RPD) with metal tin as the evaporation source. The metal‐reaction deposited SnOx films feature low resistivity (<2 × 10−3 Ω cm), high mobility (35.93 cm2 V−1 S−1), and wide optical bandgap (3.64 eV). A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 25.33% is achieved on the champion SHJ solar cell using the metal‐reaction deposited SnOx as the back TCO layer, which indicates the application potential of the metal‐reaction‐deposited SnOx as a low‐cost substitute for In‐based TCOs in SHJ solar cells and other photoelectric devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center of Materials Science and Opto‐Electronics Engineering College of Materials Science and Opto‐Electronic Technology University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 P. R. China

Binzhou Institute of Technology Shandong 256606 P. R. China

Jetion Solar(China) Co., Ltd Jiangsu 214400 P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Herasimenka S. Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 5 · 103
2. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41560-023-01255-210.1038/s41560-023-01255-2 ↗
4. K.Wakisaka M.Taguchi T.Sawada M.Tanaka T.Matsuyama T.Matsuoka S.Tsuda S.Nakano Y.Kishi Y.Kuwano presented atConf. Rec. IEEE Photovoltaic Spec. Conf. Las Vegas NV USA October1991.
5. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.04.00810.1016/j.resourpol.2017.04.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.10032910.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100329 ↗
7. 10.1002/pssr.20140942610.1002/pssr.201409426 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10854-021-07689-210.1007/s10854-021-07689-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11248010.1016/j.solmat.2023.112480 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11138710.1016/j.solmat.2021.111387 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.00410.1016/j.joule.2021.04.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11149310.1016/j.solmat.2021.111493 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.01310.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.013 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.35738310.1063/1.357383 ↗
15. 10.1143/JJAP.51.09580110.1143/JJAP.51.095801 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssb.20155272010.1002/pssb.201552720 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-020-71383-210.1038/s41598-020-71383-2 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0951510.1021/acsami.8b09515 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0230210.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02302 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41560-023-01331-710.1038/s41560-023-01331-7 ↗
21. 10.7567/JJAP.54.01AB0510.7567/JJAP.54.01AB05 ↗
22. 10.1002/solr.20230038110.1002/solr.202300381 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.34357010.1063/1.343570 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.326296310.1063/1.3262963 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.11295410.1016/j.solmat.2024.112954 ↗
26. Musztyfaga‐Staszuk M. · Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.: Tech. Sci. · 2021 · 69
27. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)00982-810.1016/S0040-6090(01)00982-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.01510.1016/j.forsciint.2006.01.015 ↗
29. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.291738610.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2917386 ↗