Imaging Solvent‐Triggered Gaseous Iodine Uptake on Single Covalent Organic Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are promising solid absorbents for the treatment of gaseous iodine. However, extensive efforts are still focused on empirical optimizations of specific binding sites and pore structures in COFs, and the chemical control of gaseous iodine uptake on COFs remains challenging. In this study, the chemically triggered sorption properties of COF‐300 for I2 vapors at the single‐particle level with the dark‐field microscope (DFM) are explored. The present operando single‐particle DFM imaging method enables the direct visualization of an adsorption activity transformation from inactive COF‐300 to active solvated COF‐300 toward gaseous I2 vapors. Exploiting the useful reaction information from time‐lapsed DFM images, the tunable adsorption performance of solvated COF‐300 is quantitatively compared by various solvents. The results illustrate that the isopropanol (IPA)‐solvated COF‐300 achieves the optimum adsorption capacity for I2 among the absorbents. The reaction mechanism is elucidated to be the channel size enlargement and modification of internal surface chemistry in the IPA‐solvated COF‐300, producing a stable I2/IPA‐solvated COF‐300 complex after the sorption reaction. The present chemical control of the sorption behavior of COF‐300 revealed by DFM opens up a new fundamental paradigm for rationally developing high‐performance COF‐based absorbents for removing I2 vapors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Nuclear Science & Technology Southwest University of Science and Technology Mianyang 621010 P. R. China
Faculty of Chemical Technology and Engineering West Pomeranian University of Technology 70–311 Szczecin Poland
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D0CS01192D10.1039/D0CS01192D ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121128510.1126/science.1211285 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.11.02410.1016/j.chempr.2020.11.024 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.abg253810.1126/science.abg2538 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.10103410.1016/j.nantod.2020.101034 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-022-30663-310.1038/s41467-022-30663-3 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.7b0320410.1021/jacs.7b03204 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20180199110.1002/adma.201801991 ↗
9. 10.1002/chem.20170540510.1002/chem.201705405 ↗
10. 10.1039/C9TA13980J10.1039/C9TA13980J ↗
11. Yin Z.‐J. · ChemComm · 2017 · 53 · 7266
12. 10.1002/anie.20210852210.1002/anie.202108522 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.0c1774810.1021/acsami.0c17748 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20201082910.1002/anie.202010829 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20210237310.1002/anie.202102373 ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.7b0109710.1021/jacs.7b01097 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.8b1369110.1021/jacs.8b13691 ↗
18. 10.1039/c2cs15292d10.1039/c2cs15292d ↗
19. 10.1039/C2CS35213C10.1039/C2CS35213C ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.0c1183810.1021/jacs.0c11838 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.2c0395910.1021/jacs.2c03959 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.7b0874810.1021/jacs.7b08748 ↗
23. 10.1039/C7CS00451F10.1039/C7CS00451F ↗
24. 10.1126/science.aat767910.1126/science.aat7679 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-021-24830-110.1038/s41467-021-24830-1 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0273410.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02734 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20130361110.1002/adma.201303611 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2009.25810.1038/nnano.2009.258 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0412410.1021/acs.analchem.6b04124 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.2c0492210.1021/acsami.2c04922 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.0c0056010.1021/jacs.0c00560 ↗
32. 10.1002/ange.20130025610.1002/ange.201300256 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41586-018-0820-910.1038/s41586-018-0820-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.04110.1016/j.memsci.2019.02.041 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-021-27127-510.1038/s41467-021-27127-5 ↗
36. 10.1002/jcc.2288510.1002/jcc.22885 ↗