3D‐Printed Electrostatic Microactuators for Flexible Microsystems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Developing small‐scale, lightweight, and flexible devices with integrated microactuators is one of the critical challenges in wearable haptic devices, soft robotics, and microrobotics. In this study, a novel fabrication process that leverages the benefits of 3D printing with two‐photon polymerization and flexible printed circuit boards (FPCBs) is presented. This method enables flexible microsystems with 3D‐printed electrostatic microactuators, which are demonstrated in a flexible integrated micromirror array and a legged microrobot with a mass of 4 mg. 3D electrostatic actuators on FPCBs are robust enough to actuate the micromirrors while the device is deformed, and they are easily integrated with off‐the‐shelf electronics. The crawling robot is one of the lightest legged microrobots actuated without external fields, and the legs actuated with 3D electrostatic actuators enable a locomotion speed of 0.27 body length per second. The proposed fabrication framework opens up a pathway toward a variety of highly integrated flexible microsystems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Micro and Nano Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Ave Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Carnegie Mellon University
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20200742810.1002/adfm.202007428 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20200256410.1002/adma.202002564 ↗
3. 10.1002/admt.20170010210.1002/admt.201700102 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41928-022-00765-310.1038/s41928-022-00765-3 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2006.88867810.1109/TED.2006.888678 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20170088010.1002/adma.201700880 ↗
7. R.Davies M.Kasper Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.2012 50 305‐21.10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125447 ↗
8. 10.1109/JMEMS.2006.87679410.1109/JMEMS.2006.876794 ↗
9. Nayar S. K. · 2004
10. 10.1089/soro.2013.000510.1089/soro.2013.0005 ↗
11. 10.1126/scirobotics.aaz923910.1126/scirobotics.aaz9239 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.040191810110.1073/pnas.0401918101 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat283510.1038/nmat2835 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41378-019-0092-z10.1038/s41378-019-0092-z ↗
15. 10.1038/s41928-020-0384-110.1038/s41928-020-0384-1 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41586-019-1322-010.1038/s41586-019-1322-0 ↗
17. Moreno A. · 2021
18. 10.1073/pnas.221502811910.1073/pnas.2215028119 ↗
19. 10.1038/s43246-021-00208-010.1038/s43246-021-00208-0 ↗
20. Ataka M. · 2013
21. Ataka M. · 2013
22. 10.1088/0964-1726/10/6/31210.1088/0964-1726/10/6/312 ↗
23. Nakahara K. · 2017
24. 10.1109/84.73534910.1109/84.735349 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20060399510.1002/anie.200603995 ↗
26. Velez C. · 2020
27. 10.1109/JMEMS.2020.301906410.1109/JMEMS.2020.3019064 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20200338010.1002/adfm.202003380 ↗
29. 10.1109/JMEMS.2020.299236710.1109/JMEMS.2020.2992367 ↗
30. Kim S. · 2021
31. 10.1016/S0924-4247(98)00258-110.1016/S0924-4247(98)00258-1 ↗
32. 10.1088/0960-1317/19/5/05501710.1088/0960-1317/19/5/055017 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mee.2011.07.01010.1016/j.mee.2011.07.010 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20170302410.1002/adma.201703024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10347410.1016/j.addma.2023.103474 ↗
36. Wang H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023
37. Nanoscribe IP‐S Tables https://support.nanoscribe.com/hc/en-gb/articles/360009156133#fig:IP-S:Solid_TGA.
38. Karpelson M. · 2008
39. 10.1016/j.sna.2011.11.03510.1016/j.sna.2011.11.035 ↗
40. 10.1089/soro.2018.014710.1089/soro.2018.0147 ↗
41. 10.1002/adma.20130500810.1002/adma.201305008 ↗
42. 10.1088/1748-3190/ac61e910.1088/1748-3190/ac61e9 ↗