Photo‐Curing 3D Printing of Thermosetting Sacrificial Tooling for Fabricating Fiber‐Reinforced Hollow Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon fiber‐reinforced hollow composites play a vital role in lightweighting modern cars and aircrafts. Fabrication of such hollow composites with seamless internal finish requires sacrificial tooling that can be used under pressure and high temperature. For the very first time, high performance sacrificial tooling that can be used to fabricate fiber‐reinforced hollow composites is produced using photocuring 3D printing technology. This is achieved by developing UV‐curable resins containing highly soluble yet hydrolysable acetal acrylate cross‐linker and hydrophilic 4‐acryloylmorpholine monomer. It is found that the cross‐linker content greatly affects the printing speed. Further, the widely adopted UV post‐curing method is found to have negligible impact on improving the thermal‐mechanical properties of printed structures. After thermal post‐treatment, printed sacrificial tooling exhibits a heat deflection temperature of 112 °C at 0.455 MPa and an average coefficient of linear thermal expansion of 59 ppm °C−1 between 30 and 100 °C. As a result, printed tooling enables fabrication of carbon fiber‐reinforced hollow composites with complex geometry, which shows a tensile strength of 802 MPa and an elastic modulus of 50.2 GPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Composite Materials and Engineering Center Washington State University Pullman WA 99164 USA
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · U.S. Department of Agriculture · National Institute of Food and Agriculture
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Njuguna J. · 2016
2. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.06810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00007-410.1016/S1359-835X(98)00007-4 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-004-2291-410.1007/s00170-004-2291-4 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.400701710.1115/1.4007017 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.05810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.058 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.08410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.084 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00110-X10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00110-X ↗
9. a) 3D Printed Sacrificial Tooling that Washes Out with Water https://www.exone.com/en-US/X1-Tooling/X1-Washout (accessed: May2022);
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10080910.1016/j.addma.2019.100809 ↗
11. c)L.Lehnert Master's thesis McGill University Quebec2019;
12. 10.1038/s41467-021-25463-010.1038/s41467-021-25463-0 ↗
13. e)R.Jones FDM sacrificial tooling for composite part fabrication https://www.stratasys.com/en/resources/whitepapers/fdm-sacrificial-tooling (accessed: May2022);
14. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.20210.1016/j.procir.2016.04.202 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.404042810.1115/1.4040428 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.00210.1016/j.msec.2015.06.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10939810.1016/j.matdes.2020.109398 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-018-21638-w10.1038/s41598-018-21638-w ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aaa239710.1126/science.aaa2397 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.aav579010.1126/sciadv.aav5790 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.00310.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-018-04292-810.1038/s41467-018-04292-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11043610.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110436 ↗
24. 10.1007/s42114-020-00183-z10.1007/s42114-020-00183-z ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2202510.1002/app.22025 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20190397010.1002/adma.201903970 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13158010.1016/j.cej.2021.131580 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20200872910.1002/adfm.202008729 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831349410110.1177/0021998313494101 ↗
30. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7LC00644F10.1039/C7LC00644F ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.03710.1016/j.addma.2018.10.037 ↗
34. 10.1021/ma021121h10.1021/ma021121h ↗
35. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0092910.1021/acscentsci.0c00929 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00737-110.1016/S0032-3861(02)00737-1 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0391910.1021/acs.iecr.6b03919 ↗
38. b)S. E. B.Wadud R. R.Ullbrich Using the DMA Q800 for ASTM International D 648 Deflection Temperature Under Load http://www.tainstruments.com/pdf/literature/RH086_Using_Q800_for_ASTM_D468.pdf (accessed: May 2022).
39. 10.1177/228080001876477010.1177/2280800018764770 ↗
40. 10.1177/15440591050840071610.1177/154405910508400716 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0006310.1021/acsapm.1c00063 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c0269910.1021/acs.macromol.0c02699 ↗
43. https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/1801089-TDS-ENUS-0P.pdf (accessed: January2023).
44. 10.1039/D2GC01745H10.1039/D2GC01745H ↗
45. PVA technical data sheet https://asset.dynamism.com/media/catalog/product/pdf/Dynamism_PVA_TDS.pdf (accessed: January 2023).