journal article·2025-01Open access

Kesterite‐Type Narrow Bandgap Piezoelectric Catalysts for Highly Efficient Piezocatalytic Fenton System

Manqi Zhang, Kai Wang, Chen Han, Ming Zhang, Jitraporn Vongsvivut, Tianbao Dong, Lihong Liu, Shaobin Wang, Shaomin Liu

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 35· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Piezocatalytic Fenton (PF) system emerges as a promising approach to wastewater treatment by leveraging piezocatalysis to enhance Fenton‐like reactions. However, conventional piezocatalysts encounter challenges because they often compromise catalytic properties in biased favor of superior piezoelectricity, resulting in sluggish catalytic kinetics. To tackle this trade‐off, here a novel class of kesterite‐type narrow bandgap piezoelectrics, Cu2XSnS4 (CXTS, X = Zn, Ni, Co), is developed for PF reactions, which exhibit a unique combination of physicochemical attributes favorable for catalysis such as narrow bandgap (1.2–1.5 eV), high free charge density (1 × 1018 cm−3), mobility, and redox activity while retaining excellent piezoelectricity (62–142 pm V−1). With the well‐balanced piezoelectric, semiconducting, and catalytic properties, CXTS‐based PF systems demonstrate outstanding performance for tetracycline degradation, delivering a notable reaction kinetics of 0.34 min−1 only with a minor H2O2 dosage (1.2 mm), outperforming most of the conventional Fenton‐like reactions requiring a large amount H2O2 dosage by a factor up to 10. Such a remarkable performance is fulfilled by the simultaneously effective H2O2 activation and in situ generation of reactive oxygen species from oxygen and water via piezocatalysis. Additionally, the distinctive hierarchical morphology consisting of 2D nanosheets enables easy crystal domain deformation to trigger the piezoelectric effect, thereby drastically reducing the mechanical energy input required to drive redox reactions. Rigorous testing has validated the viability and practical feasibility of this system. The study offers a new design strategy for highly efficient piezocatalysts in the PF systems, enabling a cost‐effective and sustainable water treatment approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Advanced oxidation water treatment · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Organic‐Inorganic Composites College of Chemical Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing 100029 China

WA School of Mines: Minerals Energy and Chemical Engineering Curtin University Perth WA 6102 Australia

School of Chemical Engineering University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Infrared Microspectroscopy (IRM) Beamline ANSTO‐Australian Synchrotron Clayton VIC 3168 Australia

College of Food Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering Zaozhuang University Zao Zhuang 277122 China

School of Chemical Engineering The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA 5005 Australia

School of Engineering Great Bay University Dongguan 523000 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-024-47269-610.1038/s41467-024-47269-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12405610.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124056 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20220067010.1002/anie.202200670 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.230537812010.1073/pnas.2305378120 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-024-46653-610.1038/s41467-024-46653-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.watres.2023.12008810.1016/j.watres.2023.120088 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20210893710.1002/anie.202108937 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.220556211910.1073/pnas.2205562119 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.231158512010.1073/pnas.2311585120 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12391810.1016/j.apcatb.2024.123918 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.231743512110.1073/pnas.2317435121 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12282410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122824 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20231387910.1002/adfm.202313879 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-021-23921-310.1038/s41467-021-23921-3 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20220512110.1002/adfm.202205121 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12199010.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121990 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20230808410.1002/adfm.202308084 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20231641010.1002/anie.202316410 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20230701810.1002/anie.202307018 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.03.00210.1016/j.chempr.2018.03.002 ↗
21. 10.1073/pnas.221881312010.1073/pnas.2218813120 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20230525710.1002/adma.202305257 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12317710.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123177 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.12098210.1016/j.envpol.2022.120982 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20230052210.1002/adfm.202300522 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.13362810.1016/j.snb.2023.133628 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20240329410.1002/adma.202403294 ↗
28. Hackett L. · Nat. Mater. · 2024 · 1 · 8
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12333510.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123335 ↗
30. 10.1039/D3TA05899A10.1039/D3TA05899A ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12128110.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121281 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12350410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123504 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11925010.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119250 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12171710.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121717 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12220410.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122204 ↗
36. Sun B. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 11 · 416
37. 10.1007/s12598-021-01955-210.1007/s12598-021-01955-2 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.05310.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.053 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0262610.1021/acsenergylett.2c02626 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-024-48256-710.1038/s41467-024-48256-7 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20240266910.1002/anie.202402669 ↗
42. 10.1002/cssc.20150166110.1002/cssc.201501661 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20211042910.1002/anie.202110429 ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20221392710.1002/anie.202213927 ↗
45. 10.1002/adma.20210175110.1002/adma.202101751 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12271410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122714 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10825210.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108252 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20230407210.1002/adfm.202304072 ↗
49. 10.1002/smll.20230387610.1002/smll.202303876 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.19510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.195 ↗
51. 10.1007/s00339-017-1371-x10.1007/s00339-017-1371-x ↗
52. 10.1002/cssc.20230061110.1002/cssc.202300611 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10816210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108162 ↗
54. Mao Y. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 55
55. 10.1002/anie.20240143410.1002/anie.202401434 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14767610.1016/j.cej.2023.147676 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.13047610.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130476 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12090410.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120904 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10851510.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108515 ↗
60. 10.1038/s41467-022-33065-710.1038/s41467-022-33065-7 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14186610.1016/j.cej.2023.141866 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10039010.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100390 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13393010.1016/j.cej.2021.133930 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.12431310.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124313 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.010 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.09210.1016/j.jcis.2023.05.092 ↗
67. 10.1002/smll.20200157310.1002/smll.202001573 ↗