Isomeric Poly(arylene piperidinium) Electrolyte Membranes with High Alkaline Durability
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The isomerization strategy is employed to enhance the alkaline stability of poly(arylene piperidinium)s (PAP) while maintaining the monomer commerciality and polymer architecture tunability. Isomeric poly(arylene piperidinium) (i‐PAP) exhibits improved alkali resistance relative to conventional PAP, as evidenced by ex situ alkaline stability and in situ cell durability tests. Following treatment in 10 m aqueous NaOH at 80 °C for 360 h or operation at 0.4 A cm−2 for 100 h in an anion exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) prototype, the decomposition of the piperidinium moieties in i‐PAP is ≈50% of that observed in PAP. Moreover, through a copolymerization strategy, the i‐PAP‐88 membrane, which has suppressed water absorption, reaches a peak power density of 1.44 W cm−2 and demonstrates an in situ durability of 310 h. Furthermore, a noble metal‐free (anode) AEM water electrolyzer (AEMWE) achieves a high current density of 6.43 A cm⁻2 at 2.0 V and an excellent Faradaic efficiency of 98.3%. This study highlights a strategy for designing alkali‐stable polyelectrolytes that mitigate degradation during the operation of alkaline electrochemical devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Anhui Key Laboratory of Advanced Catalytic Materials and Reaction Engineering Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Value‐Added Catalytic Conversion and Reaction Engineering Hefei University of Technology Hefei 230009 China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-019-0372-810.1038/s41560-019-0372-8 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-021-03482-710.1038/s41586-021-03482-7 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.211988311910.1073/pnas.2119883119 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20230704110.1002/adfm.202307041 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20231669710.1002/anie.202316697 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c0266510.1021/acs.macromol.3c02665 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20221043210.1002/adma.202210432 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20200198610.1002/aenm.202001986 ↗
9. 10.1039/D3CS00186E10.1039/D3CS00186E ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.121721511010.1073/pnas.1217215110 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b0035510.1021/acs.accounts.9b00355 ↗
12. 10.1002/cssc.20140302210.1002/cssc.201403022 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-024-47809-010.1038/s41467-024-47809-0 ↗
14. Lee W.‐H. · ACS Macro Lett. · 2015 · 4 · 818
15. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0070410.1021/acs.macromol.1c00704 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20230667510.1002/adma.202306675 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20240076410.1002/anie.202400764 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.5b0287910.1021/jacs.5b02879 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0067910.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00679 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12084310.1016/j.memsci.2022.120843 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20170275810.1002/adfm.201702758 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.047 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-023-38350-710.1038/s41467-023-38350-7 ↗
24. 10.1002/cssc.20230165610.1002/cssc.202301656 ↗
25. 10.1039/D2TA03862E10.1039/D2TA03862E ↗
26. 10.1021/ma102267f10.1021/ma102267f ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c0530910.1021/acs.jpcb.3c05309 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.5b1195110.1021/jacs.5b11951 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0TA05807F10.1039/D0TA05807F ↗
30. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0188010.1021/acscatal.2c01880 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nxener.2023.10004410.1016/j.nxener.2023.100044 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0020710.1021/acsenergylett.4c00207 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41929-024-01209-110.1038/s41929-024-01209-1 ↗