journal article·2024-05Open access

Hybrid Co‐Spinning and Melt Electrowriting Approach Enables Fabrication of Heterotypic Tubular Scaffolds Resembling the Non‐Linear Mechanical Properties of Human Blood Vessels

Michael Bartolf‐Kopp, Leanne de Silva, Antoine J. W. P. Rosenberg, Jürgen Groll, Debby Gawlitta, Tomasz Jungst

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 34· Issue 21

Abstract

Abstract The current barrier to clinical translation of small‐caliber tissue‐engineered vascular grafts (TEVGs) is the long‐term patency upon implantation in vivo. Key contributors are thrombosis and stenosis caused by inadequate mechanical graft properties and mismatch of hemodynamic conditions. Herein, the authors report on an approach for the fabrication of a mechanically tunable bilayered composite TEVGs. Using a combination of solution electrospinning (SES) and melt electrowriting (MEW), it is shown that the mechanical properties can be tailored and the natural J‐shape of the stress–strain relationship can be recapitulated. Upon cell seeding, the luminal surface of the composite SES layers permits the formation of a confluent mature endothelium. MEW fibers provide structural support to promote stacking and orientation of MSCs in a near‐circumferential native vessel like direction. By adjusting the ratios of poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(ester‐urethane) during the SES process, TEVGs with a range of tunable mechanical properties can be manufactured. Notably, this hybrid approach permits modulation of the radial tensile properties of TEVGs to approximate different native vessels. Overall, a strategy for the fabrication of TEVGs with mechanical properties resembling those of native vessels which can help to accommodate long‐term patency of TEVGs at various treatment sites in future applications is demonstrated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry Institute of Functional Materials and Biofabrication (IFB) KeyLab Polymers for Medicine of the Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI) University of Würzburg Pleicherwall 2 97070 Würzburg Germany

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht GA 3508 The Netherlands

Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht Utrecht CT 3584 The Netherlands

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s12967-018-1763-510.1186/s12967-018-1763-5 ↗
2. 10.1088/1758-5090/acbf7a10.1088/1758-5090/acbf7a ↗
3. 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.010010.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60684-410.1016/S0003-4975(10)60684-4 ↗
5. Faries P. L. · J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord · 2000 · 31 · 1119
6. 10.1161/hc37t1.09452710.1161/hc37t1.094527 ↗
7. Veith F. J. · Surgery · 1979 · 85 · 253
8. 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00167-710.1016/S0003-4975(97)00167-7 ↗
9. Carpenter J. P. · J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord · 1998 · 27 · 492
10. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.77140010.3389/fbioe.2021.771400 ↗
11. 10.1106/NA5T-J57A-JTDD-FD0410.1106/NA5T-J57A-JTDD-FD04 ↗
12. Knight D. K. · Front. Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 1
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.03510.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.035 ↗
14. Mrówczyński W. · J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord · 2014 · 59 · 210
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.07810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.078 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c0059910.1021/acs.biomac.0c00599 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.05810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.058 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.04410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.044 ↗
19. 10.5301/ijao.500018510.5301/ijao.5000185 ↗
20. 10.4161/org.6.4.1340710.4161/org.6.4.13407 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.293481610.1126/science.2934816 ↗
22. 10.1038/nm136410.1038/nm1364 ↗
23. 10.1096/fsb2fasebj.12.1.4710.1096/fsb2fasebj.12.1.47 ↗
24. 10.3389/fbioe.2018.0004110.3389/fbioe.2018.00041 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.01210.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.05110.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.051 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20190598710.1002/adfm.201905987 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.10010610.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100106 ↗
29. Z.Li C.Wang One‐Dimensional Nanostructures – Chaper 2 – Effects of Working Parameters on Electrospinning 2013.https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-36427-3(accessed: October 2023).10.1007/978-3-642-36427-3_2 ↗
30. 10.3390/fib202015810.3390/fib2020158 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.11208510.1016/j.msec.2021.112085 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-019-11446-910.1038/s41467-019-11446-9 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20110348210.1002/adma.201103482 ↗
34. 10.1002/admt.20220025910.1002/admt.202200259 ↗
35. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.61736410.3389/fbioe.2020.617364 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0053510.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00535 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.024 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.004 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0078810.1021/acsabm.2c00788 ↗
40. 10.1371/journal.pone.009067610.1371/journal.pone.0090676 ↗
41. 10.1002/pi.494810.1002/pi.4948 ↗
42. 10.1023/A:101083531656410.1023/A:1010835316564 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.00310.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.003 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsami.9b0029310.1021/acsami.9b00293 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.017 ↗
46. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.018310.1089/ten.tea.2008.0183 ↗
47. 10.1002/polb.1048210.1002/polb.10482 ↗
48. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-002210.1515/ntrev-2019-0022 ↗
49. 10.1080/19443994.2015.102474710.1080/19443994.2015.1024747 ↗
50. 10.1002/app.3973510.1002/app.39735 ↗
51. 10.1002/adem.20220047910.1002/adem.202200479 ↗
52. 10.1002/jbm.1016710.1002/jbm.10167 ↗
53. 10.1073/pnas.090326910710.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
54. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab47f010.1088/1758-5090/ab47f0 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20230888810.1002/adfm.202308888 ↗
56. 10.1186/s12951-021-01225-410.1186/s12951-021-01225-4 ↗
57. 10.1038/am.2015.6610.1038/am.2015.66 ↗
58. 10.1371/journal.pone.008808910.1371/journal.pone.0088089 ↗
59. 10.1093/cvr/cvab04610.1093/cvr/cvab046 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.08.00110.1016/j.jss.2009.08.001 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41536-021-00155-x10.1038/s41536-021-00155-x ↗
62. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06841.x10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06841.x ↗
63. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0174010.1021/acsomega.2c01740 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11148810.1016/j.matdes.2022.111488 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.10064710.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100647 ↗
66. 10.1155/2016/140630410.1155/2016/1406304 ↗
67. 10.1177/15353702022260071510.1177/153537020222600715 ↗
68. 10.1096/fj.12-20929610.1096/fj.12-209296 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.003 ↗
70. 10.1177/088532820201700186110.1177/0885328202017001861 ↗
71. 10.3389/fphys.2020.0051910.3389/fphys.2020.00519 ↗
72. 10.1128/MCB.00695-0710.1128/MCB.00695-07 ↗
73. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.09653710.1113/jphysiol.2005.096537 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.01510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.015 ↗
76. 10.1177/088532821882075110.1177/0885328218820751 ↗