journal article·2013-06Open access

Phase growth control in low temperature PLD Co: TiO2 films by pressure

S. Rout, N. Popovici, S. Dalui, M.L. Paramês, R.C. da Silva, A.J. Silvestre, O. Conde

Current Applied Physics· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

This paper reports on the structural and optical properties of Co-doped TiO2 thin films grown onto (0001) Al2O3 substrates by non-reactive pulsed laser deposition (PLD) using argon as buffer gas. It is shown that by keeping constant the substrate temperature at as low as 310 C and varying only the background gas pressure between 7 Pa and 70 Pa, it is possible to grow either epitaxial rutile or pure anatase thin films, as well as films with a mixture of both polymorphs. The optical band gaps of the films are red shifted in comparison to the values usually reported for undoped TiO2, which is consistent with n-type doping of the TiO2 matrix. Such band gap red shift brings the absorption edge of the Co-doped TiO2 films into the visible region, which might favour their photocatalytic activity. Furthermore, the band gap red shift depends on the films phase composition, increasing with the increase of the Urbach energy for increasing rutile content.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Hashimoto · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 44 · 826910.1143/JJAP.44.8269 ↗
2. Chatterjee · Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 942410.1021/jp1016642 ↗
3. Chu · Nanopart. Res. · 2008 · 10 · 35710.1007/s11051-007-9241-7 ↗
4. Qi · Thin Solid Films · 2011 · 519 · 243810.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.046 ↗
5. Biswas · Phys. Stat. Sol. (A) · 2008 · 205 · 202310.1002/pssa.200778893 ↗
6. Wu · Photobiol. A: Chem. · 2004 · 163 · 50910.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.02.007 ↗
7. Matsumoto · Science · 2001 · 291 · 85410.1126/science.1056186 ↗
8. Matsumoto · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · L120410.1143/JJAP.40.L1204 ↗
9. Ueda · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 98810.1063/1.1384478 ↗
10. Chambers · 2005 · 199
11. Pereira · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 22250210.1063/1.3036534 ↗
12. Yang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 719210.1063/1.1651799 ↗
13. Hong · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 737810.1063/1.1649806 ↗
14. Shinde · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 11521110.1103/PhysRevB.67.115211 ↗
15. Chambers · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 418 · 19710.1016/S0040-6090(02)00709-5 ↗
16. Popovici · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2006 · 352 · 148610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.036 ↗
17. Branford · 2007 · vol. 893 · 1199
18. Doolitle · Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1985 · 9 · 34410.1016/0168-583X(85)90762-1 ↗
19. Gao · J. Cryst. Growth · 2000 · 212 · 17810.1016/S0022-0248(00)00010-5 ↗
20. Cullity · 2001
21. Winsor · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. · 1932 · 18 · 110.1073/pnas.18.1.1 ↗
22. Amoruso · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 10150110.1063/1.3565157 ↗
23. Cullity · 2001
24. Reyes-Coronado · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 14560510.1088/0957-4484/19/14/145605 ↗
25. Manifacier · J. Phys. E · 1976 · 9 · 1002
26. Fox · 2010
27. Enright · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 102710.1021/jp951142w ↗
28. Tang · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 204210.1063/1.356306 ↗
29. Cox · 2010
30. Park · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 16120110.1103/PhysRevB.65.161201 ↗
31. Di Mo · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1302310.1103/PhysRevB.51.13023 ↗
32. Ha · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2006 · 49 · S675
33. Subramanian · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 377610.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.125 ↗
34. Banerjee · Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. · 2011 · 4 · 3510.2147/NSA.S9040 ↗
35. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 414310.1063/1.1627962 ↗
36. Pankove · 1975
37. Choudhury · Photochem. Photobiol. · 2012 · 88 · 25710.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01064.x ↗
38. Caglar · J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. · 2010 · 53 · 37210.1007/s10971-009-2105-0 ↗