journal article·2022-08Open access

Tuning the Performance of Negative Tone Electron Beam Resists for the Next Generation Lithography

Scott M. Lewis, Guy A. DeRose, Hayden R. Alty, Matthew S. Hunt, Nathan Lee, James A. Mann, Richard Grindell, Alex Wertheim, Lucia De Rose, Antonio Fernandez, Christopher A. Muryn, George F. S. Whitehead, Grigore A. Timco, Axel Scherer, Richard E. P. Winpenny

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 32· Issue 32

Abstract

Abstract A new class of electron bean negative tone resist materials has been developed based on heterometallic rings. The initial resist performance demonstrates a resolution of 15 nm half‐pitch but at the expense of a low sensitivity. To improve sensitivity a 3D Monte Carlo simulation is used that utilizes a secondary and Auger electron generation model. The simulation suggests that the sensitivity can be dramatically improved while maintaining high resolution by incorporating appropriate chemical functionality around the metal–organic core. The new resists designs based on the simulation have the increased sensitivity expected and illustrate the value of the simulation approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Semiconductor materials and devices · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Photon Science Institute The University of Manchester Oxford Road Manchester M13 9PL UK

The Kavli Nanoscience Institute California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Boulevard, 107 – 81 Pasadena CA 91125 USA

Sci‐Tron Ltd 34 High Street, Aldridge Walsall WS9 8LZ UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1116/1.325365210.1116/1.3253652 ↗
2. 10.1117/12.91661310.1117/12.916613 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mee.2014.06.01310.1016/j.mee.2014.06.013 ↗
4. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/29/29200110.1088/0957-4484/20/29/292001 ↗
5. 10.1088/0960-1317/24/9/09501010.1088/0960-1317/24/9/095010 ↗
6. 10.1039/c2tc00148a10.1039/c2tc00148a ↗
7. 10.1007/s00289-014-1197-z10.1007/s00289-014-1197-z ↗
8. 10.1039/c3tc31896f10.1039/c3tc31896f ↗
9. IEEE International Roadmap for Devices and Systems 2018
10. Lewis S. M. · 2018
11. Lewis S. M. · 2016 · 42110.1016/B978-0-08-100354-1.00012-0 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20170022410.1002/anie.201700224 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20130481710.1002/anie.201304817 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn201800e10.1021/nn201800e ↗
15. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/25/25530510.1088/0957-4484/20/25/255305 ↗
16. Goodyear A. · Proc. SPIE · 2015 · 9428 · 94280V10.1117/12.2085469 ↗