Probing Physicochemical Performances of 3D Printed Carbon Fiber Composites During 8‐Month Exposure to Space Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs) offer exceptional properties that make them highly relevant in the aerospace industry, such as high thermal conductivity and an outstanding strength‐to‐weight ratio. Advances in additive manufacturing have expanded the aerospace applications of CFRPs, even allowing for in‐space fabrication of complex structures. Understanding the stability of CFRPs in the harsh conditions of low Earth orbit (LEO) is crucial. LEO exposes materials to extreme environmental factors, such as vacuum, radiation, atomic oxygen, and temperature fluctuations, which can accelerate degradation. To investigate the space‐environment effect on material, changes in properties of 3D‐printed CFRPs are compared with CFRPs made through forging and conventional compression molding. Surface analyses examine morphological, chemical, and matrix composition changes, along with an evaluation of mechanical integrity. Remarkably, the naked 3D printed CFRPs withstood 8 months of LEO exposure similar to the compression molded CFRP samples, with changes in chemical properties limited to the sample's outer surface. Further, despite no protective coatings are used, limited surface erosion and no variation in mechanical strength are observed. These results provide relevant information for the development and deployment of novel 3D printed CFRPs materials for a wide spectrum of terrestrial and space applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Nanomedicine Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston TX 77030 USA
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. Sant'Agata Bolognese Bologna 40019 Italy
Department of Surgery Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston TX 77030 USA
Department of Radiation Oncology Houston Methodist Research Institute Houston TX 77030 USA
Funding
University of Washington · National Science Foundation · Molecular Engineering and Sciences Institute, University of Washington
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-019-04348-z10.1007/s00170-019-04348-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12108710.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121087 ↗
3. 10.3390/app1209430710.3390/app12094307 ↗
4. 10.3847/2041-8213/ab801610.3847/2041-8213/ab8016 ↗
5. De Rooij A. · 2010
6. 10.1038/s41563-018-0184-410.1038/s41563-018-0184-4 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0035438910.1007/BF00354389 ↗
8. a)B. A.Banks K. K.deGroh S. K.Miller MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) NN8‐1Vol.851 2004;10.1557/PROC-851-NN8.1 ↗
9. 10.3923/srj.2014.1.1310.3923/srj.2014.1.13 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0168-583X(03)00640-210.1016/S0168-583X(03)00640-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.011 ↗
13. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00073-610.1016/S1359-8368(99)00073-6 ↗
14. a)J. A.Townsend C. E.Powers M. J.Viens M. T.Ayres‐Treusdell B. F.Munoz Degradation of Teflon (tm) FEP Following Charged Particle Radiation and Rapid Thermal Cycling. In Space Simulations January1998;
15. 10.1088/0954-0083/11/1/01010.1088/0954-0083/11/1/010 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.add694710.1126/sciadv.add6947 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c2155210.1021/acsami.0c21552 ↗
18. a)J. A.Dever Low Earth Orbital Atomic Oxygen and Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on Polymers (No. NASA‐TM-103711)1991;
19. 10.1016/B978-0-323-52472-8.00029-010.1016/B978-0-323-52472-8.00029-0 ↗
20. Banks B. · 2004
21. K. K.De Groh B. A.Banks MISSE‐Flight Facility Polymers and Composites Experiment 1‐4 (PCE 1‐4) (No. E‐19886)2021.
22. Banks B. · 2004
23. B.Banks S.Miller K.deGroh A.Chan M.Sahota The Development of Surface Roughness and Implications for Cellular Attachment in Biomedical Applications. MRS Proceedings2001 705Y54 https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC‐705‐Y5.4.10.1557/PROC-705-Y5.4 ↗
24. Banks B. A. · 1999
25. 10.1021/am100223v10.1021/am100223v ↗
26. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016172.09723.ee10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016172.09723.ee ↗
27. 10.1163/156856198X0057910.1163/156856198X00579 ↗
28. 10.2514/3.2664110.2514/3.26641 ↗
29. 10.2514/3.2664010.2514/3.26640 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0167-577X(96)00290-X10.1016/S0167-577X(96)00290-X ↗
31. 10.1002/sia.740220111310.1002/sia.7402201113 ↗
32. 10.2514/2.210310.2514/2.2103 ↗
33. 10.1139/v74-46510.1139/v74-465 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.05.012 ↗
35. Rath S. K. · 2006 · 855
36. 10.3390/polym1310162810.3390/polym13101628 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab3fda10.1088/1361-665X/ab3fda ↗
38. J. R.Reeder Prediction of Long‐Term Strength of Thermoplastic Composites Using Time‐Temperature Superposition (No. L‐18220)2002.
39. 10.1063/1.307686510.1063/1.3076865 ↗
40. 10.1177/095400830808970610.1177/0954008308089706 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.12.04310.1016/j.actaastro.2006.12.043 ↗
42. 10.1139/p91-18010.1139/p91-180 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00071-710.1016/S0266-3538(97)00071-7 ↗