Revealing Intrinsic Relations Between Cu Scales and Radical/Nonradical Oxidations to Regulate Nucleophilic/Electrophilic Catalysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Copper/carbon catalysts under different electron‐transfer regimes can evolve both radical and nonradical pathways in peroxide activation. However, the underlying trigger to manipulate the transition in between is unclear. Herein, it is revealed that Cu species in a state of sub‐nanometre particles (SNPs, < 1 nm) exhibits an electrophilic nature, which is opposite to its nucleophilic nature at a larger scale (nanoclusters, > 1 nm). This switch between nucleophile/electrophile nature leads to distinct catalytic mechanisms in activating peroxymonosulfate, i.e., nonradical 1O2 surface‐bound upon Cu SNPs and unleashed radical •OH induced by Cu nanoclusters. The vacancy defects of biomass‐derived carbon can stabilize Cu SNPs via a CuVC configuration, circumventing the contemporary difficulties in coordinating/preserving MetalNC bonding. Depth profiling, chemical probes, and charge density difference modeling support the regulable electroactive nature over modulated Cu scales. This featured system is applied for tetracycline degradation, and Cu SNPs demonstrates the highest efficacy with their better peroxymonosulfate confinement in nonradical regime (88.9% removal, nucleophilic activation). Comparatively, severe Cu leaching caused by radical erosion (44.8% removal, electron‐donation) is undesirable. Overall, a regulable heterogeneous catalysis is unraveled over carbon‐supported Cu sites through scaling modulation and defect engineering. This study illuminates a promising path for customizing biomass‐derived Cu‐based catalysts to achieve versatile catalysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced oxidation water treatment · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Hom Kowloon Hong Kong China
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA 5005 Australia
School of Environment Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027 China
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.20310.1016/j.cej.2018.09.203 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0708210.1021/acs.est.9b07082 ↗
3. 10.1039/D0GC00717J10.1039/D0GC00717J ↗
4. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.01510.1016/j.watres.2015.07.015 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0047110.1021/acs.estlett.6b00471 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0161810.1021/acs.est.1c01618 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.04910.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.049 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.04710.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.047 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12513810.1016/j.cej.2020.125138 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12486410.1016/j.cej.2020.124864 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0547510.1021/acs.est.9b05475 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0CS01032D10.1039/D0CS01032D ↗
13. 10.1039/C9GC01843C10.1039/C9GC01843C ↗
14. 10.1039/D1TA02237G10.1039/D1TA02237G ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-021-21925-710.1038/s41467-021-21925-7 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-019-12851-w10.1038/s41467-019-12851-w ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms1529110.1038/ncomms15291 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0853110.1021/acs.est.0c08531 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0053510.1021/acs.accounts.7b00535 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-022-28810-x10.1038/s41467-022-28810-x ↗
21. 10.1038/s41893-022-00887-810.1038/s41893-022-00887-8 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20190284410.1002/aenm.201902844 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.12361310.1016/j.biortech.2020.123613 ↗
24. 10.1039/c3ta10592j10.1039/c3ta10592j ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20180571710.1002/adma.201805717 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12613610.1016/j.cej.2020.126136 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.poly.2008.08.02010.1016/j.poly.2008.08.020 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-019-12510-010.1038/s41467-019-12510-0 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6SC00432F10.1039/C6SC00432F ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20181010410.1002/anie.201810104 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41893-020-00635-w10.1038/s41893-020-00635-w ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-020-16648-010.1038/s41467-020-16648-0 ↗
33. 10.1039/D1TA08494A10.1039/D1TA08494A ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.09.03210.1016/j.cattod.2019.09.032 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.29810.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.298 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14353910.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143539 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11914610.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119146 ↗
38. 10.1209/epl/i2001-00105-410.1209/epl/i2001-00105-4 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20180827610.1002/adma.201808276 ↗
40. 10.1016/0008-6223(81)90064-610.1016/0008-6223(81)90064-6 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10973-017-6174-y10.1007/s10973-017-6174-y ↗
42. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.05910.1016/j.watres.2019.05.059 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-022-29283-810.1038/s41467-022-29283-8 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0095910.1021/acs.est.8b00959 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0251910.1021/acs.est.7b02519 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.watres.2022.11873010.1016/j.watres.2022.118730 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0226610.1021/acs.est.8b02266 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.est.0c0028410.1021/acs.est.0c00284 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.01810.1016/j.watres.2013.05.018 ↗
50. 10.1021/es503656m10.1021/es503656m ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0151210.1021/acs.est.8b01512 ↗
52. 10.1016/0045-6535(92)90060-510.1016/0045-6535(92)90060-5 ↗
53. 10.1002/chem.20190372710.1002/chem.201903727 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.00310.1016/j.ccr.2018.03.003 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.21321910.1016/j.ccr.2020.213219 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11612010.1016/j.envpol.2020.116120 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12251910.1016/j.cej.2019.122519 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.03310.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.033 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.22510.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.225 ↗
60. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
62. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.277070810.1063/1.2770708 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.01410.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.170310.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.364110.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641 ↗