journal article·2023-01-01

Predicting the Flexural Rigidity in Fused Shirt Components Using Design of Experiment

Renjini G, Sudhakar R

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 10· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Men’s formal shirts have fused components requiring a specific level of stiffness to maintain a crisp formal look. The stiffness of the neck band is an essential criterion in the aesthetic look when displayed on the retail shelf and during end-usage. This study aims to explain the effect of the physical parameters of the fabric, interlining and fusing process parameters on the flexural rigidity of the fused collar stand. The two-step factorial analysis of screening and reduced factor design shows that the flexural rigidity of samples after fusing is influenced by three factors: fabric areal weight, interlining areal weight and interlining finish. Furthermore, the flexural rigidity of samples was reduced considerably after washing and was influenced by three factors: interlining areal weight, interlining finish and fusing time. The polynomial equation explaining the relation has been derived. The findings help understand the variables to consider while selecting interlinings for formal shirts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Color perception and design · Color Science and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Apparel Technology and Management, Bangalore University, Bangalore, India

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101211-6.00006-910.1016/B978-0-08-101211-6.00006-9 ↗
2. 10.5772/6430910.5772/64309 ↗
3. 10.1108/0955622131129859210.1108/09556221311298592 ↗
4. Tyler DJ (ed.). Carr and Latham’s technology of clothing manufacture. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009, pp. 237–239.
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.432010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.4320 ↗
6. Masteikaite V, Saceviciene V, Cironiene V. Compressed loop method for the bending behaviour of coated and laminated fabrics analysis. Text Res J 2014; 43(3): 350–365.
7. 10.1080/1944702300866152910.1080/19447023008661529 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751142076410.1177/0040517511420764 ↗
9. 10.17482/uumfd.67122210.17482/uumfd.671222 ↗
10. Yildiz EZ, Ozdil N. Subjective and objective evaluation of the handle properties of the shirt fabric fused with different woven interlining. Tekst Konfeks 2014; 24(1): 47–55.
11. 10.1108/0955622051059085810.1108/09556220510590858 ↗
12. 10.1108/0955622971018552310.1108/09556229710185523 ↗
13. Sukigara S Nishiyama C. Relationship among subjective fabric volume mechanical properties and structural parameters of fusible interlining in interlined fabrics. In: Proceedings of 5th IASDR 2013 (Consilience and innovation in design) Tokyo Japan 26–30 August 2013 pp. 2619–2626 http://design-cu.jp/iasdr2013/papers/1558-1b.pdf
14. 10.1007/s12221-018-8167-210.1007/s12221-018-8167-2 ↗
15. 10.7741/rjcc.2017.25.4.44810.7741/rjcc.2017.25.4.448 ↗
16. 10.1177/004051751038721210.1177/0040517510387212 ↗
17. 10.4188/transjtmsj.37.10_T16110.4188/transjtmsj.37.10_T161 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051751245676410.1177/0040517512456764 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175970670030610.1177/004051759706700306 ↗
20. 10.1177/00405175710410080710.1177/004051757104100807 ↗
21. Koksharov S, Kornilova N, Shammut Y. Design of composite materials for clothes. ICMSSTE 2020; 315: 03001.
22. 10.1533/9780857097613.2.13510.1533/9780857097613.2.135 ↗
23. 10.1177/0887302X010190020210.1177/0887302X0101900202 ↗
24. 10.1177/004051752091334710.1177/0040517520913347 ↗
25. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, 2013.
26. 10.1108/0955622991027626910.1108/09556229910276269 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0287727810.1007/BF02877278 ↗
28. 10.14502/Tekstilec2018.61.224-23410.14502/Tekstilec2018.61.224-234 ↗
29. 10.35530/IT.070.02.157110.35530/IT.070.02.1571 ↗