Modeling and simulation of efficiency droop in GaN-based blue light-emitting diodes incorporating the effect of reduced active volume of InGaN quantum wells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The efficiency droop of InGaN-based blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is analyzed using numerical simulations with a modified ABC carrier recombination model. The ABC model is modified to include the effect of reduced effective active volume of InGaN quantum wells (QWs) and incorporated into the numerical simulation program. It is found that the droop of internal quantum efficiency (IQE) can be well explained by the effect of reduced light-emitting active volume without assuming a large Auger recombination coefficient. A simulated IQE curve with the modified ABC model is found to fit quite well with a measured efficiency curve of an InGaN LED sample when the effective active volume takes only 2.5% of the physical volume of QWs. The proposed numerical simulation model incorporating the reduced effective active volume can be advantageous for use in the modeling and simulation of InGaN LEDs for higher efficiency.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Pust · Nat. Mater · 2015 · 14 · 45410.1038/nmat4270 ↗
2. Weisbuch · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2015 · 212 · 89910.1002/pssa.201431868 ↗
3. Cho · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2017 · 11 · 160014710.1002/lpor.201600147 ↗
4. Piprek · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2010 · 207 · 221710.1002/pssa.201026149 ↗
5. Verzellesi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 07110110.1063/1.4816434 ↗
6. Shen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 14110110.1063/1.2785135 ↗
7. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 18350710.1063/1.2800290 ↗
8. Monemar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 18110310.1063/1.2801704 ↗
9. Yang · IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. · 2008 · 55 · 177110.1109/TED.2008.923561 ↗
10. Rozhansky · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2007 · 204 · 22710.1002/pssa.200673567 ↗
11. Oh · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 15 · S710.1016/j.cap.2015.04.018 ↗
12. Ryu · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 4481410.1038/srep44814 ↗
13. Iveland · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 17740610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177406 ↗
14. Bertazzi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 06111210.1063/1.4908154 ↗
15. Piprek · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 10110110.1063/1.4914833 ↗
16. Piprek · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 03110110.1063/1.4927202 ↗
17. Bertazzi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 23111810.1063/1.3525605 ↗
18. Kioupakis · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 16110710.1063/1.3570656 ↗
19. Ryu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 13110910.1063/1.3698113 ↗
20. Chichibu · Nat. Mater · 2006 · 5 · 81010.1038/nmat1726 ↗
21. Gu · Phys. Stat. Sol. RRL · 2009 · 3 · 10010.1002/pssr.200903007 ↗
22. Shim · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2011 · 58 · 50310.3938/jkps.58.503 ↗
23. Kim · Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 123510.1364/OE.22.001235 ↗
24. APSYS by Crosslight Software, Inc., Burnaby, Canada [Online], Available: http://www.crosslight.com.
25. Shockley · Phys. Rev. · 1952 · 87 · 83510.1103/PhysRev.87.835 ↗
26. De Santi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 09450110.1063/1.4942438 ↗
27. Fiorentini · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 120410.1063/1.1448668 ↗
28. Flory · IEEE J. Quantum Electron · 2001 · 37 · 24410.1109/3.903075 ↗
29. Kuo · J. Disp. Technol. · 2016 · 12 · 139810.1109/JDT.2016.2594044 ↗
30. Piprek · Proc. SPIE · 2012 · 8262 · 82620E10.1117/12.904744 ↗