journal article·2024-11Open access

Substrate Curvature‐Induced Regulation of Charge Distribution of Covalent Organic Frameworks Promotes Capacitive Deionization

Dong Jiang, Ruibo Xu, Liang Bai, Jonathan P. Hill, Joel Henzie, Liyang Zhu, Wei Xia, Ran Bu, Yingji Zhao, Yunqing Kang, Takashi Hamada, Renzhi Ma, Nagy Torad, Jie Wang, Toru Asahi, Xingtao Xu, Yusuke Yamauchi

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 34· Issue 45

Abstract

Abstract Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are promising high‐performance capacitive deionization (CDI) materials. Strategies to optimize CDI performance of COFs focus largely on hybridization with conductive substrates, to improve their their intrinsically poor conductivity. A new structure‐function relationship between COFs and their substrates is proposed here based on substrate‐induced surface curvature. Graphene (zero‐curvature) and carbon nanotubes (CNT, curved) are selected as COF growthsubstrates to assess the effect of curvature engineering effect on CDI performance of TpPa‐SO3H‐COF. Ultrahigh ion (Na+) adsorption capacity (58.74 mg g−1) is achieved by CNT‐COF hybrid (cf. compared to graphene‐COF hybrid 34.20 mg g−1), demonstrating the significance of curvature engineering. Notably, the corresponding salt (NaCl) adsorption capacity of CNT‐COF hybrid reaches 149.25 mg g−1 in 1000 ppm at 1.2 V, representing state‐of‐the‐art CDI performance, and the highest value among organic CDI electrodes. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical calculations subsequently reveal that substrate curvature can induce local strain, which regulates charge distribution within the COF skeleton, causing a lower binding energy state for Na+ adsorption. Electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance measurements revealed faster Na+ adsorption kinetics of CNT‐COF due to regulated charge distribution within COF skeleton induced by substrate curvature. This work gives new insight into design of COF materials based on curvature engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Membrane Separation Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Process Engineering Graduate School of Engineering Nagoya University Furo‐cho, Chikusa‐ku Nagoya Aichi 464‐8603 Japan

Faculty of Science and Engineering Waseda University 3‐4‐1 Okubo Shinjuku Tokyo 169‐8555 Japan

Marine Science and Technology College Zhejiang Ocean University Zhoushan 316022 P. R. China

Research Center for Materials Nanoarchitechtonics National Institute for Materials Science Namiki Tsukuba Ibaraki 305‐0044 Japan

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Anhui University of Technology Ma'anshan 243032 P. R. China

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering Institute of Pharmaceutical Engineering College of Chemical and Biological Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027 P. R. China

Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN) The University of Queensland Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Yonsei University Yonsei‐ro, Seodaemungu Seoul 03722 South Korea

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-020-0193-110.1038/s41578-020-0193-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.07310.1016/j.watres.2017.12.073 ↗
3. Xu X. · Mater. Horiz. · 2020 · 7 · 1412
4. 10.1039/C5EE00519A10.1039/C5EE00519A ↗
5. Wang Z. · Mater. Horiz. · 2019 · 6 · 1437
6. 10.1021/jacs.3c0175510.1021/jacs.3c01755 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0232010.1021/acs.est.5b02320 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20190938710.1002/adfm.201909387 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0EE03145C10.1039/D0EE03145C ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20190687710.1002/adma.201906877 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20221357810.1002/adfm.202213578 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TA06733F10.1039/C6TA06733F ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20200221310.1002/advs.202002213 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20210247710.1002/smll.202102477 ↗
15. 10.1002/admt.20220182810.1002/admt.202201828 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41563-020-0747-z10.1038/s41563-020-0747-z ↗
17. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.02410.1016/j.watres.2017.10.024 ↗
18. 10.1039/D0CS00620C10.1039/D0CS00620C ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.8b1033410.1021/jacs.8b10334 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aal158510.1126/science.aal1585 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20200305410.1002/aenm.202003054 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20210017710.1002/aenm.202100177 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.00710.1016/j.matt.2020.09.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.04.01210.1016/j.chempr.2023.04.012 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.04410.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.044 ↗
26. 10.1039/C9TA07344B10.1039/C9TA07344B ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20210188010.1002/aenm.202101880 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-023-06247-610.1038/s41586-023-06247-6 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep0822510.1038/srep08225 ↗
30. 10.1002/anie.20230218010.1002/anie.202302180 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20171050210.1002/anie.201710502 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.03510.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.035 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.11510.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.115 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja502646c10.1021/ja502646c ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.08110.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.081 ↗
36. 10.1093/bulcsj/uoae07410.1093/bulcsj/uoae074 ↗
37. 10.1021/ja308278w10.1021/ja308278w ↗
38. Xu Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2023 · 62
39. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0494710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04947 ↗
40. 10.1039/C8CC08957D10.1039/C8CC08957D ↗
41. 10.1021/ja409421d10.1021/ja409421d ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.9b0054310.1021/jacs.9b00543 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.6b0618910.1021/acsami.6b06189 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20150591710.1002/adma.201505917 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-018-02889-710.1038/s41467-018-02889-7 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.9b0346710.1021/jacs.9b03467 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10675610.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106756 ↗
48. 10.1126/science.124148810.1126/science.1241488 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41563-018-0215-110.1038/s41563-018-0215-1 ↗