journal article·2022-04Open access

Inverse Design of Inflatable Soft Membranes Through Machine Learning

Antonio Elia Forte, Paul Z. Hanakata, Lishuai Jin, Emilia Zari, Ahmad Zareei, Matheus C. Fernandes, Laura Sumner, Jonathan Alvarez, Katia Bertoldi

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 32· Issue 16

Abstract

Abstract Across fields of science, researchers have increasingly focused on designing soft devices that can shape‐morph to achieve functionality. However, identifying a rest shape that leads to a target 3D shape upon actuation is a non‐trivial task that involves inverse design capabilities. In this study, a simple and efficient platform is presented to design pre‐programmed 3D shapes starting from 2D planar composite membranes. By training neural networks with a small set of finite element simulations, the authors are able to obtain both the optimal design for a pixelated 2D elastomeric membrane and the inflation pressure required for it to morph into a target shape. The proposed method has potential to be employed at multiple scales and for different applications. As an example, it is shown how these inversely designed membranes can be used for mechanotherapy applications, by stimulating certain areas while avoiding prescribed locations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

J.A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA 02138 USA

Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering Politecnico di Milano Milan 20133 Italy

Department of Engineering King's College London London WC2R 2LS UK

Department of Physics Harvard University Cambridge MA 02138 USA

Independent researcher

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.00410.1016/j.mattod.2017.10.004 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563-019-0452-y10.1038/s41563-019-0452-y ↗
3. 10.1038/s41563-018-0219-x10.1038/s41563-018-0219-x ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.190880611610.1073/pnas.1908806116 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11037710.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110377 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aan562710.1126/science.aan5627 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat454010.1038/nmat4540 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.201924111810.1073/pnas.2019241118 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.125261010.1126/science.1252610 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.121530910.1126/science.1215309 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.190454411610.1073/pnas.1904544116 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10406810.1016/j.jmps.2020.104068 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20200451510.1002/adma.202004515 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0SM01041C10.1039/D0SM01041C ↗
15. M.Skouras B.Thomaszewski B.Bickel M.Gross inComputer Graphics Forum Vol. 31 Wiley Online Library2012 pp. 835–844.10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03064.x ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20200186310.1002/adma.202001863 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.161514011410.1073/pnas.1615140114 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat454010.1038/nmat4540 ↗
19. 10.1145/2897824.292594410.1145/2897824.2925944 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat454410.1038/nmat4544 ↗
21. 10.1145/3450626.345978910.1145/3450626.3459789 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.00910.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.009 ↗
23. 10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.54110.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 ↗
24. 10.1613/jair.499210.1613/jair.4992 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.25530410.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255304 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.04200610.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.042006 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20190484510.1002/adma.201904845 ↗
28. 10.1039/C8MH00653A10.1039/C8MH00653A ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10850910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.191181511610.1073/pnas.1911815116 ↗
31. 10.1126/sciadv.abd741610.1126/sciadv.abd7416 ↗
32. 10.1002/adem.20190126610.1002/adem.201901266 ↗
33. E.Haghighat M.Raissi A.Moure H.Gomez R.Juanes A deep learning framework for solution and discovery in solid mechanics 2020.
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11126410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111264 ↗
35. 10.1002/adts.20190005610.1002/adts.201900056 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-020-0309-610.1038/s41524-020-0309-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.035 ↗
38. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz416910.1126/sciadv.aaz4169 ↗
39. 10.1089/soro.2015.000110.1089/soro.2015.0001 ↗
40. 10.1073/pnas.161514011410.1073/pnas.1615140114 ↗
41. 10.1109/TRO.2015.242850410.1109/TRO.2015.2428504 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41524-020-0341-610.1038/s41524-020-0341-6 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0317110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
44. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0057210.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b0069010.1021/acs.jcim.7b00690 ↗
46. 10.1109/MC.1993.27494210.1109/MC.1993.274942 ↗
47. P. Y.Simard D.Steinkraus J. C.Platt et al. inIcdar vol. 3 Citeseer2003.
48. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.599534710.1109/CVPR.2011.5995347 ↗
49. Cubuk E. D. · 2019 · 113
50. K.Vodrahalli K.Li J.Malik arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.125692018.
51. V.Birodkar H.Mobahi S.Bengio arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.114092019.
52. 10.1109/ICIP.2016.753240610.1109/ICIP.2016.7532406 ↗
53. 10.1021/ci00027a00610.1021/ci00027a006 ↗
54. Bishop C. M. · Machine Learning · 2006 · 128 · 9
55. Hinton N. Srivastava, G. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2014 · 15 · 1929
56. 10.1089/wound.2016.070910.1089/wound.2016.0709 ↗
57. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318220b15910.1097/SLA.0b013e318220b159 ↗
58. Maturana D. · 2015 · 3471
59. Huang J. · 2016 · 2670
60. Choi Y. · 2018 · 8789
61. Isola P. · 2017 · 1125
62. M.Mirza S.Osindero arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.17842014.