journal article·2024-07Open access

First Advanced Bilayer Scaffolds for Tailored Skin Tissue Engineering Produced via Electrospinning and Melt Electrowriting

Fabien Girard, Caroline Lajoye, Marie Camman, Nicolas Tissot, Florence Berthelot Pedurand, Biranche Tandon, Denise Moedder, Ievgenii Liashenko, Sacha Salameh, Paul D. Dalton, Maïté Rielland

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 34· Issue 27

Abstract

Abstract In vitro skin models are validated methods for screening cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, but still have limitations. The bilayer poly(ε‐caprolactone) scaffold/membrane model described here overcomes some of these deficits by integrating a solution electrospun (SES) membrane at the dermoepidermal interface and a melt electrowritten (MEW) scaffold that provides an optimal open‐pore environment for the dermis. To the knowledge, this scaffold/membrane model is the only one capable of creating a properly differentiated, full thickness skin model with neosynthesized extracellular matrix (ECM) in only 18 days. Both the wavy and straight fiber scaffold designs create a well‐organized dermis, but dermal collagen organization differs between designs. Adding cells and vitamin C to the scaffolds improves the mechanical properties to more closely mimic native human skin. These findings establish bicomponent scaffolds as a promising advancement for rapidly creating different skin models with varied properties. The versatility and adaptability of the described model can be used for studying how the biological and physical microenvironment impact skin, and testing dermo‐cosmetics and pharmaceutical treatments on different ages of skin. Furthermore, it can be an excellent new tool for studying wound healing and development into its use as a graft or wound dressing is ongoing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Skin Tech Platform L'Oréal Advanced Research 1 Avenue Eugène Schueller Aulnay‐sous‐Bois 93600 France

Imaging Unit L'Oréal Advanced Research 1 Avenue Eugène Schueller Aulnay‐sous‐Bois 93600 France

Microsystems Laboratory École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Lausanne CH‐1015 Switzerland

Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact University of Oregon 1505 Franklin Blvd Eugene OR 97403 USA

Department of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry University of Würzburg Pleicherwall 2 97070 Würzburg Germany

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.700819710.1126/science.7008197 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0092-8674(75)80001-810.1016/S0092-8674(75)80001-8 ↗
3. 10.3390/pharmaceutics401002610.3390/pharmaceutics4010026 ↗
4. 10.1111/bjd.1388610.1111/bjd.13886 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20210508010.1002/adfm.202105080 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11926710.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119267 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.01610.1016/j.addr.2018.07.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.01.00810.1016/j.tiv.2018.01.008 ↗
9. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1408155410.3390/pharmaceutics14081554 ↗
10. 10.1111/aor.1450310.1111/aor.14503 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9PY01021A10.1039/C9PY01021A ↗
12. 10.1002/bit.2236110.1002/bit.22361 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.02810.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028 ↗
14. 10.3390/molecules2709290210.3390/molecules27092902 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.envint.2015.07.01510.1016/j.envint.2015.07.015 ↗
16. 10.1089/aivt.2014.001010.1089/aivt.2014.0010 ↗
17. OECD Test No. 428: Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method 2004.
18. 10.1111/exd.1283210.1111/exd.12832 ↗
19. 10.1203/01.PDR.0b013e318165eb3e10.1203/01.PDR.0b013e318165eb3e ↗
20. 10.1089/ten.2005.11.72310.1089/ten.2005.11.723 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.00910.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.01910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.09.019 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10439-014-1124-310.1007/s10439-014-1124-3 ↗
24. 10.1039/D3BM00046J10.1039/D3BM00046J ↗
25. 10.1002/btm2.1048410.1002/btm2.10484 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.02510.1016/j.polymer.2010.01.025 ↗
27. 10.1081/MA-10010838010.1081/MA-100108380 ↗
28. 10.1021/acssynbio.1c0054710.1021/acssynbio.1c00547 ↗
29. 10.1089/ten.teb.2007.043510.1089/ten.teb.2007.0435 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00417-009-1263-710.1007/s00417-009-1263-7 ↗
31. 10.1002/aic.1039010.1002/aic.10390 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
33. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.61714110.3389/fbioe.2021.617141 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.05.001 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20190466410.1002/adfm.201904664 ↗
36. 10.1111/joa.1218610.1111/joa.12186 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108092 ↗
38. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e ↗
39. 10.3390/nu908086610.3390/nu9080866 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.03510.1016/j.actbio.2022.02.035 ↗
41. 10.1074/jbc.M50950020010.1074/jbc.M509500200 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.00210.1016/j.matbio.2018.01.002 ↗
43. 10.1242/jcs.09628910.1242/jcs.096289 ↗
44. 10.1016/bs.ctm.2015.05.00110.1016/bs.ctm.2015.05.001 ↗
45. 10.1002/ar.2356710.1002/ar.23567 ↗
46. 10.1155/2013/17978410.1155/2013/179784 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.03.01710.1016/j.biocel.2008.03.017 ↗
48. 10.1159/00009765510.1159/000097655 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20210678010.1002/adma.202106780 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10529-018-2611-710.1007/s10529-018-2611-7 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0009410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00094 ↗
52. 10.1055/s-0030-127046010.1055/s-0030-1270460 ↗
53. 10.1055/s-0030-126723410.1055/s-0030-1267234 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.05010.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.050 ↗
55. 10.3390/app1104149310.3390/app11041493 ↗
56. 10.1039/D2MH00115B10.1039/D2MH00115B ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.009 ↗
58. 10.1002/adhm.20180154410.1002/adhm.201801544 ↗
59. 10.1002/smtd.20220158910.1002/smtd.202201589 ↗