journal article·2022-09-02Open access

Interpretable Machine Learning Analysis of Stress Concentration in Magnesium: An Insight beyond the Black Box of Predictive Modeling

Russlan Jaafreh, Jung-Gu Kim, Kotiba Hamad

Crystals· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

In the present work, machine learning (ML) was employed to build a model, and through it, the microstructural features (parameters) affecting the stress concentration (SC) during plastic deformation of magnesium (Mg)-based materials are determined. As a descriptor for the SC, the kernel average misorientation (KAM) was used, and starting from the microstructural features of pure Mg and AZ31 Mg alloy, as recorded using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), the ML model was trained and constructed using various types of ML algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Extremely Randomized Trees (ERT). The results show that the accuracy of the ERT-based model was higher compared to other models, and accordingly, the nine most-important features in the ERT-based model, those with a Gini impurity higher than 0.025, were extracted. The feature importance showed that the grain size is the most effective microstructural parameter for controlling the SC in Mg-based materials, and according to the relative Accumulated Local Effects (ALE) plot, calculated to show the relationship between KAM and grain size, it was found that SC occurs with a lower probability in the fine range of grain size. All findings from the ML-based model built in the present work were experimentally confirmed through EBSD observations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Advanced Material Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Korea

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Designing highly ductile magnesium alloys: Current status and future challenges10.1080/10408436.2021.1947185 ↗
2. The role and significance of Magnesium in modern day research-A review10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.012 ↗
3. Mechanical properties of magnesium alloys for medical application: A review10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.022 ↗
4. Chaudry, U.M., Farooq, A., Malik, A., Nabeel, M., Sufyan, M., Tayyeb, A., Asif, S., Inam, A., Elbalaawy, A., and Hafez, E. (2022). Biodegradable properties of AZ31-0.5Ca magnesium alloy. Mater. Technol., 1–12.
5. Effect of calcium on the superplastic behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2021.140874 ↗
6. Rejuvenation of plasticity via deformation graining in magnesium10.1038/s41467-022-28688-9 ↗
7. {10–12} extension twinning activity and compression behavior of pure Mg and Mg-0.5Ca alloy at cryogenic temperature10.1016/j.msea.2021.142189 ↗
8. Generalized stacking fault energy in magnesium alloys: Density functional theory calculations10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.038 ↗
9. Molecular dynamics simulation of nanometer scale mechanical properties of hexagonal MgLi alloy10.1016/j.jma.2015.12.001 ↗
10. Lattice Thermal Conductivity: An Accelerated Discovery Guided by Machine Learning10.1021/acsami.1c17378 ↗
11. Machine learning guided discovery of super-hard high entropy ceramics10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130899 ↗
12. Crystal structure guided machine learning for the discovery and design of intrinsically hard materials
13. Finding the Next Superhard Material through Ensemble Learning10.1002/adma.202005112 ↗
14. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024104 ↗
15. Machine Learning Directed Search for Ultraincompressible, Superhard Materials10.1021/jacs.8b02717 ↗
16. Gui, Y., Li, Q., Xue, Y., and Ouyang, L. (2021). Twin-twin geometric structure effect on the twinning behavior of an Mg-4Y-3Nd-2Sm-0.5Zr alloy traced by quasi-in-situ EBSD. J. Magnes. Alloy.
17. On the ductility of magnesium based materials: A mini review10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.031 ↗
18. Dieter, G.E., and Bacon, D. (1988). Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill.
19. Estimation of geometrically necessary dislocation density from filtered EBSD data by a local linear adaptation of smoothing splines10.1107/S1600576719004035 ↗
20. Zheng, A., and Casari, A. (2018). Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques for Data Scientists, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
21. Interaction–Transformation Evolutionary Algorithm for Symbolic Regression10.1162/evco_a_00285 ↗
22. A Review of Strain Analysis Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction10.1017/S1431927611000055 ↗
23. Ertekin, S., Huang, J., and Giles, C.L. (2007, January 23–27). Active learning for class imbalance problem. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1145/1277741.1277927 ↗
24. Elkan, C. (2001, January 4–10). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Itelligence, Seattle, WA, USA.
25. KBA: Kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution10.1109/TKDE.2005.95 ↗
26. Mohammed, R., Rawashdeh, J., and Abdullah, M. (2020, January 7–9). Machine Learning with Oversampling and Undersampling Techniques: Overview Study and Experimental Results. Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), Irbid, Jordan.10.1109/ICICS49469.2020.239556 ↗
27. Glazkova, A. (2020). A Comparison of Synthetic Oversampling Methods for Multi-class Text Classification. arXiv.
28. He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E.A., and Li, S. (2008, January 1–8). ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Hong Kong, China.
29. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
30. Cramer, J. (2022, August 10). The Origins of Logisitic Regression. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper No. 2002-119/4, December 2002. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=360300.
31. On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss10.1023/A:1007413511361 ↗
32. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879 ↗
33. On the capabilities of multilayer perceptrons10.1016/0885-064X(88)90020-9 ↗
34. Induction of decision trees10.1007/BF00116251 ↗
35. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
36. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
37. Costa, E.P., Carvalho, A.C.P.L.F., Lorena, A.C., and Freitas, A.A. (2007). A Review of Performance Evaluation Measures for Hierarchical Classifiers. AAAI Work. Tech. Rep., 1–6. Available online: https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2007/WS-07-05/WS07-05-001.pdf.
38. Understanding variable importances in Forests of randomized trees
39. Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models10.1111/rssb.12377 ↗
40. Baniecki, H., Kretowicz, W., and Biecek, P. (2021). Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoning. arXiv.
41. Super-formable pure magnesium at room temperature10.1038/s41467-017-01330-9 ↗
42. Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys: Part I: “Tension” twins10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037 ↗
43. Twinning and the ductility of magnesium alloys: Part II. “Contraction” twins10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.109 ↗
44. Grain size effect on tensile properties and slip systems of pure magnesium10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116604 ↗
45. The role of deformation twinning in the fracture behavior and mechanism of basal textured magnesium alloys10.1016/j.msea.2014.02.010 ↗
46. De Souto, M.C.P., Bittencourt, V.G., and Costa, J.A.F. (2006, January 3–6). An Empirical Analysis of Under-Sampling Techniques to Balance a Protein Structural Class Dataset. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing ICONIP 2006, Hong Kong, China.