journal article·2016-01-06

Microstructural Evolution of a Cu and θ-Al2O3 Composite Formed By Reduction of Delafossite CuAlO2: A HAADF-STEM Study

Zhiyang Yu, Michael Kracum, Animesh Kundu, Martin P. Harmer, Helen M. Chan

Crystal Growth & Design· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In situ reduction of bulk, polycrystalline copper(I) aluminate (CuAlO 2 ) results in the formation of an intimate two-phase mixture of metallic Cu and θ-alumina. The microstructure of a partially transformed region was studied at the atomistic scale using high-angle angular-dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM). The observations were consistent with a topotactic transformation mechanism whereby deintercalation of the Cu atoms occurs sequentially at the edges of the Cu + atomic layers of the CuAlO 2 delafossite structure. The Cu forms faceted nanoislands that exhibit an orientation relationship with the θ-alumina matrix. There is also concomitant outward diffusion of oxygen, and it is suggested that the θ-alumina is formed by the consolidation of the layers of Al–O octahedra of the delafossite structure, with some local rearrangement of the Al 3+ ions. This model is supported by the observed continuity of the Al–O layers between the parent CuAlO 2 and θ-alumina, together with the orientation relationship (0003)CuAlO 2 // (402̅)θ-alumina .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States

Funding

Office of Naval Research

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.31610.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.316 ↗
2. 10.1038/4008710.1038/40087 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.15511410.1103/PhysRevB.64.155114 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.11.03310.1016/j.apcatb.2008.11.033 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-015-8850-210.1007/s10853-015-8850-2 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-013-7620-210.1007/s10853-013-7620-2 ↗
7. 10.1246/bcsj.78.75210.1246/bcsj.78.752 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10562-007-9277-410.1007/s10562-007-9277-4 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3ce40197a10.1039/c3ce40197a ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-014-8744-810.1007/s10853-014-8744-8 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma301031810.3390/ma3010318 ↗
12. Wefers K. · 1987
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02581.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02581.x ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.67.224104 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.165193510.1063/1.1651935 ↗
16. 10.1016/0040-6090(91)90116-F10.1016/0040-6090(91)90116-F ↗
17. 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90494-Q10.1016/0039-6028(92)90494-Q ↗
18. 10.1016/0042-207X(94)90220-810.1016/0042-207X(94)90220-8 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-006-0073-010.1007/s10853-006-0073-0 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.279402510.1063/1.2794025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.00810.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.008 ↗
22. Pastorek R. L. · T. Met. Soc. AIME · 1969 · 245 · 1711
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.12.02010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.12.020 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01198.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01198.x ↗