Orientation Control and Mosaicity in Heteroepitaxial RuO2 Thin Films Grown through Reactive Direct Current Sputtering
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide With the emergence of altermagnetism, a theoretical spin state has been revealed, which could address the long-standing scaling and frequency challenges of modern spintronics in high-performance computing. The experimental realization of high-speed and low-power spintronics has brought about an especially high renewed interest in the preparation and characterization of antiferromagnetic materials. Among the candidates for future altermagnetic applications is RuO 2, which has been modeled to boast a large spin–orbit coupling-related band splitting, a high Néel temperature, and a robust inherent sheet conductivity. Investigation of this material for future altermagnetic applications necessarily involves the ready preparation of single-crystal films with controlled orientations, which to date is almost exclusively accomplished through the use of oxide molecular beam epitaxy or pulsed metal organic chemical vapor deposition. Within this report, the crystalline qualities of RuO 2 films prepared through high-temperature direct current reactive sputtering are investigated. It is shown that utilization of TiO 2 substrates with different orientations [(001), (101), and (110)] provides a means to template the orientation of RuO 2 and that the crystalline quality of the deposited film depends strongly on the lattice match between the two materials. Through X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and electron back scatter diffraction measurements, it is shown that high-quality epitaxial films can be grown on all three substrates, while the (101)-oriented TiO 2 presents the best template for the strain-relaxed and low-roughness single-crystal RuO 2 unit cell. This fast and accessible process is enabling for the experimental investigation of the altermagnetic properties of this material, which is a requirement ahead of its application in future spintronics devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, Washington, District of Columbia 20375, United States
Materials Science and Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia 20375, United States
Electronics Science and Technology Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia 20375, United States
Funding
U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.287.5457.147410.1126/science.287.5457.1474 ↗
2. 10.1021/jz201650710.1021/jz2016507 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0870010.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08700 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.139317510.1149/1.1393175 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.222087710.1149/1.2220877 ↗
6. 10.1063/5.006414510.1063/5.0064145 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.00910.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.009 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.07.03810.1016/j.ensm.2021.07.038 ↗
9. 10.1021/cs500117410.1021/cs5001174 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1369-8001(02)00101-410.1016/S1369-8001(02)00101-4 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.07720110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.077201 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.01720210.1103/PhysRevLett.122.017202 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.21650110.1103/PhysRevLett.131.216501 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.04050110.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz880910.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41928-022-00866-z10.1038/s41928-022-00866-z ↗
17. 10.1038/s41928-022-00744-810.1038/s41928-022-00744-8 ↗
18. 10.1126/sciadv.aar356610.1126/sciadv.aar3566 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41928-020-0461-510.1038/s41928-020-0461-5 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.129.137201 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.19720210.1103/PhysRevLett.128.197202 ↗
22. 10.1002/adom.20230017710.1002/adom.202300177 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.13442410.1103/PhysRevB.109.134424 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.05670110.1103/PhysRevLett.132.056701 ↗
25. 10.1021/cg301801h10.1021/cg301801h ↗
26. 10.1016/s0022-0248(01)01907-810.1016/s0022-0248(01)01907-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00233-X10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00233-X ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.14700110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.147001 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.016033510.1063/5.0160335 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.04510.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.045 ↗
31. 10.1557/jmr.1997.013910.1557/jmr.1997.0139 ↗
32. 10.1016/0025-5408(92)90093-F10.1016/0025-5408(92)90093-F ↗
33. Roginskaya Y. E. · Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. · 1977 · 22 · 110
34. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2019.02.013 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2019.11284110.1016/j.ultramic.2019.112841 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.354610.1103/PhysRevB.42.3546 ↗
37. 10.1002/pssb.20200032310.1002/pssb.202000323 ↗
38. Birkholz M. · 2006
39. 10.1038/s41467-020-20252-710.1038/s41467-020-20252-7 ↗
40. 10.1017/s143192761300184010.1017/s1431927613001840 ↗