journal article·2012-05-02

Surface Degradation during Separation of Crystals from Solution: Minimizing the Shut-off Effect

Fieke J. van den Bruele, Kess M. Marks, Bram Harmsen, Alinda L. Alfring, Hannah Sprong, Willem J. P. van Enckevort, Elias Vlieg

Crystal Growth & Design· Volume 12· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Deterioration of crystal surfaces during removal from solution prior to observation poses a problem for ex situ (atomic force) microscopy studies. We use potash alum (KAl(SO 4 ) 2 ·12H 2 O) crystals as a model system and investigate the variation of the following parameters: size, orientation, lifting rate, humidity, airflow, rinsing, and pollution. A model to describe the effects occurring during removal is developed and implications for other systems are presented to minimize the discrepancy between in situ and ex situ surfaces. This discrepancy is minimized for potash alum when a crystal is lifted slowly from its solution in a vertical position at a humidity below room humidity and in the absence of air flow.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Crystallization and Solubility Studies · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Srinivasan K. · Cryst. Res. Technol. · 2010 · 45 · 94610.1002/crat.201000314 ↗
2. Kowacz M. · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 2010 · 74 · 46910.1016/j.gca.2009.10.028 ↗
3. Mullin, J. W.Crystallization,Fourthed.Butterworth-Heinemann:Oxford, 2001; pp315–402.10.1016/B978-075064833-2/50010-3 ↗
4. Alvarez A. J. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2010 · 10 · 221910.1021/cg901496s ↗
5. Kratochvil B. · Chem. Listy · 2010 · 104 · 823
6. Vekilov P. G. · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 234610.1039/c0nr00628a ↗
7. Verma S. · Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. · 2008 · 54 · 110.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2008.03.001 ↗
8. McPherson A. · 1999
9. Cheng M. · Sci. China: Technol. Sci. · 2010 · 53 · 155410.1007/s11431-010-3162-x ↗
10. Yang S. F. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1999 · 203 · 42510.1016/S0022-0248(99)00070-6 ↗
11. Tsukamoto K. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1983 · 61 · 19910.1016/0022-0248(83)90355-X ↗
12. Maruyama M. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2009 · 9 · 12710.1021/cg701219h ↗
13. Ester G. R. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1997 · 182 · 9510.1016/S0022-0248(97)00322-9 ↗
14. van Enckevort W. J. P. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1979 · 47 · 19610.1016/0022-0248(79)90242-2 ↗
15. van Enckevort W. J. P. · Z. Physik. Chem. · 1981 · 124 · 17110.1524/zpch.1981.124.2.171 ↗
16. Price R. · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1991 · 455 · 411710.1098/rspa.1999.0493 ↗
17. Kotrla M. · Czech. J. Phys. · 1992 · 42 · 44910.1007/BF01605217 ↗
18. van Veenendaal E. · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 417 · 12110.1016/S0039-6028(98)00676-1 ↗
19. Reyhani M. M. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1999 · 198 · 25810.1016/S0022-0248(98)01137-3 ↗
20. Adamson, A. W.Physical Chemistry of Surfaces;John Wiley and Sons:New York, 1990; p390.
21. Marcus Y. J. · Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 364110.1021/je1002175 ↗
22. Kubota N. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1985 · 73 · 35910.1016/0022-0248(85)90313-6 ↗
23. Wilson S. D. R. · J. Eng. Math. · 1982 · 16 · 20910.1007/BF00042717 ↗
24. Coulson J. M. · 1964 · 1
25. Guo Z. · Phys. Fluids · 2006 · 18 · 06710710.1063/1.2214367 ↗
26. Arsic J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 120 · 972010.1063/1.1712971 ↗
27. Ewing, G. E.In:Intermolecular Forces and Clusters II;Wales, D., Ed.Springer:Berlin, 2005; Structure and Bonding, Vol.116, pp1–25.
28. Hare E. F. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1955 · 59 · 33510.1021/j150526a014 ↗
29. Herminghaus S. · Science · 1998 · 282 · 91610.1126/science.282.5390.916 ↗
30. van den Bruele F. J. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 49810.1021/la902140t ↗
31. Schreiber F. · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 65 · 15110.1016/S0079-6816(00)00024-1 ↗