Enclathration of Picoline Isomers by (rac)-TADDOLs: Structures, Selectivity, and Thermal Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
In this investigation, we studied the preferences of three α,α,α′,α′-tetraphenyl-l,3-dioxolane-4,5-dimethanol (TADDOL)-derived host compounds toward the isomers of methyl-pyridines (picolines). Ten novel inclusion compounds were synthesized, and their structural and thermal properties were further characterized. Binary competition experiments were performed, and all three hosts discriminate between the picoline isomer guests. Interestingly, all three hosts display different preferences toward the isomers, and these results were rationalized by their resulting crystal structures and packing analysis and correlated to their differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results. DSC results showed a correlation between the thermal stability of an inclusion compound and the preference of the host toward a given isomer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Crystallography and molecular interactions · Crystal structures of chemical compounds · Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Supramolecular Chemistry Research, Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Institut für Organische Chemie, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Leipziger Strasse 29, D-09596, Freiberg/Sachs, Germany
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1521-3773(20010105)40:1<92::AID-ANIE92>3.0.CO;2-K10.1002/1521-3773(20010105)40:1<92::AID-ANIE92>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tet.2015.07.06110.1016/j.tet.2015.07.061 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0136810.1021/acs.cgd.7b01368 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tet.2016.10.06210.1016/j.tet.2016.10.062 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0131110.1021/acs.cgd.6b01311 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.02610.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.026 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0065801310.1007/BF00658013 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0142310.1021/acs.cgd.7b01423 ↗
9. 10.1039/p2995000106310.1039/p29950001063 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0025110.1021/acs.cgd.8b00251 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0166110.1021/acs.cgd.6b01661 ↗
12. Vötle F. · 1991
13. 10.1021/cm010445210.1021/cm0104452 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7CS90049J10.1039/C7CS90049J ↗
15. 10.1246/cl.1987.231710.1246/cl.1987.2317 ↗
16. Farina M. · 1996 · 6
17. 10.1002/pola.1986.08024050110.1002/pola.1986.080240501 ↗
18. Ward M. D. · 2017 · 6
19. Stojakovic J. · 2017 · 7
20. Báthori, N. B.; Nassimbeni, L. R. In Supramolecular Chemistry: From Molecules to Nanomaterials; John Wiley: Chichester, 2012; pp 3009–3016.
21. 10.1002/1521-3765(20020816)8:16<3678::AID-CHEM3678>3.0.CO;2-410.1002/1521-3765(20020816)8:16<3678::AID-CHEM3678>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
22. 10.1039/P2990000095310.1039/P29900000953 ↗
23. 10.1021/jo00051a02910.1021/jo00051a029 ↗
24. Sheldrick G. M. · 1997
25. 10.1021/cg201087s10.1021/cg201087s ↗
26. Speck A L. · 1980
27. 10.1107/S010876810402030010.1107/S0108768104020300 ↗
28. 10.1039/B203191B10.1039/B203191B ↗
29. 10.1039/b715227b10.1039/b715227b ↗
30. TA Instruments, Universal Analysis, version 4.5A; Waters LLC, 2000.
31. TA Instruments, Trios, v4.1.133073.
32. 2007 · 7
33. 10.1021/j100785a00110.1021/j100785a001 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tet.2017.03.04910.1016/j.tet.2017.03.049 ↗
35. 10.1039/P2990000212910.1039/P29900002129 ↗