journal article·2010-04-07

Selectivity and Enantiomeric Resolution in Inclusion Chemistry: A Systematic Study of Chiral Discrimination through Crystallization

Nikoletta B. Báthori, Luigi R. Nassimbeni

Crystal Growth & Design· Volume 10· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanism of enantiomeric resolution of 2-butylamine has been elucidated by employing a chiral host which enclathrated ( R ) - and ( S ) - 2-butylamine in different proportions. We first measured the selectivity curve for a mixture of pyridine and morpholine, whose proportions in the crystals were determined by the refinement of single crystal X-ray structure determination and independently by 1 H NMR spectroscopy and showed that X-ray diffraction is a robust and accurate method for determining the composition of mixed guests. We then measured the enantiomeric selectivity of this host for 2-butylamine and found correlation between selectivity, the torsional flexibility of the phenyl moieties of the host, and the concomitant remaining volume that accommodates the guest. This mechanism was confirmed by repeating the competition experiments with a related chiral host.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular spectroscopy and chirality · Crystallography and molecular interactions · Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Supramolecular Chemistry Research, Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Wilen, S. H.Resolving Agents and Resolution in Organic Chemistry. Topics in Stereochemistry;Wiley-Interscience,New York, 1971; Vol.6, pp107−176.10.1002/9780470147153.ch3 ↗
2. Jacques J. · 1991
4. Arad-Yellin, R., Green, B. S., Knossow, M., and Tsoucaris, G.Enantiomeric selectivity of host lattices, in Inclusion Compounds;Academic Press:New York, 1984; Vol.3, pp263−295.
5. Newcomb M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1979 · 101 · 494110.1021/ja00511a025 ↗
6. Nguyen V. T. · New. J. Chem. · 2009 · 33 · 173610.1039/b900463g ↗
7. Gjerlov A. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1997 · 53 · 70810.1107/S0108768197003480 ↗
8. Larsen S. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1993 · 49 · 31010.1107/S0108768192008371 ↗
9. Larsen S. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1993 · 49 · 30310.1107/S0108768192007377 ↗
10. Sakai K. · Tetrahedron: Asymmetry · 2004 · 15 · 349510.1016/j.tetasy.2004.08.035 ↗
11. Sakai K. · Tetrahedron: Asymmetry · 2006 · 17 · 181210.1016/j.tetasy.2006.06.037 ↗
12. Karamertzanis P. G. · J. Phys. Chem. B. · 2007 · 111 · 532610.1021/jp068530q ↗
13. Znigg S. P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 156510.1021/ja00213a033 ↗
14. Vries T. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 1998 · 37 · 234910.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980918)37:17<2349::AID-ANIE2349>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
15. van Mil J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1981 · 103 · 124810.1021/ja00395a058 ↗
16. Addadi L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1981 · 103 · 124910.1021/ja00395a059 ↗
17. Addadi L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1981 · 103 · 125110.1021/ja00395a060 ↗
18. Pivovar A. M. · Chem. Mater. · 2001 · 13 · 301810.1021/cm0104452 ↗
19. Jacobs A. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2008 · 8 · 130110.1021/cg7010343 ↗
20. Connolly M. L. · J. Mol. Graph. · 1993 · 13910.1016/0263-7855(93)87010-3 ↗
21. Collett A. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 1998 · 37 · 323910.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981217)37:23<3239::AID-ANIE3239>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
22. 1998
23. 2005
24. Otwinowski Z. · 2000
25. 2004
26. 2003
27. Sheldrick G. M. · 1997
28. Barbour L. J. · J. Supramol. Chem. · 2001 · 1 · 18910.1016/S1472-7862(02)00030-8 ↗
29. Spek A. L. · 2008