Centrifugal spinning for biomedical use: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of polymeric fiber scaffolds in the biomedical field has been studied extensively in recent years. Among the principal methods used for obtaining the scaffold fibers at the micrometer to nanometer scale are: electrospinning, blow-spinning, and centrifugal spinning, with different peculiarities applying to each methodology. The centrifuge spinning method stands out for its simplicity and high rate of fiber production, despite the fact that it is little used to obtain fibers for scaffolds. The objective of this bibliographical review is to present a brief history of the centrifugal spinning method and the flexibility and easiness of its implementation when compared to the others. Furthermore, this article presents the types of medical applications being studied, the properties used in the methods (showing the current range of applications), and the characteristics of the polymer fibers and membranes obtained, as well as the performance of scaffolds in cell culture and in vivo tests, based on published work. This all illustrates the high potential of the technique for use in the biomedical field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Fellow of Biomaterials Science and Engineering at International Union of Societies for Biomaterials Science and Engineering (FBSE – IUSBSE), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Funding
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. PICK, E.; Und, V. Vorrichtung zur Herstellung von Glasfäden. Austrian Patent Office, (AT50878B), 1909.
2. Ratner D. · 2004 · 1 · 10
3. Eichhorn, S.; Hearle, J. W. S.; Jaffe, M.; Kikutani, T., Handbook of Textile Fibre Structure: Volume 2: Natural, Regenerated, Inorganic and Specialist Fibres,1st ed. Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, 2009; Chapter. 9. pp. 322–326.10.1533/9781845696504 ↗
4. 10.1080/15583724.2014.93585810.1080/15583724.2014.935858 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.042 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.159263810.1063/1.1592638 ↗
7. 10.1590/2446-4740.18003910.1590/2446-4740.180039 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.6b1299410.1021/acsami.6b12994 ↗
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1015.17010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1015.170 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl101355x10.1021/nl101355x ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.01110.1016/j.msec.2014.06.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.05410.1016/j.mee.2010.12.054 ↗
13. Elsivier. Scopus. SciVerse Scopus. n.d. https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?display=basic#basic (November 23, 2021).
14. 10.1002/polb.2359610.1002/polb.23596 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl080124q10.1021/nl080124q ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1203057510.3390/polym12030575 ↗
17. Meerman , J. J. · 1996
18. Kilic, A. K., Yalcin, H. Y., Akgul, Y. A., Gumus, T. G., Erol, M. E., Kurtulus, M. K., Pampal, E. S. P., Calisir, M. D. C., Canbay, E. C. & Polat, Y. P. (2015). A centrifugal spinning device used for nanofiber/microfiber production (WO2016111656A1). World Intellectual Property Organization. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5e/20/c6/a13d2b4213d51f/WO2016111656A1.pdf
19. 10.1208/s12249-012-9916-y10.1208/s12249-012-9916-y ↗
20. 10.6028/jres.063A.02010.6028/jres.063A.020 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0530210.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05302 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.4997510.1002/app.49975 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.01710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.09.017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.03710.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.037 ↗
25. Marques, D. R. Fibras De Poli (Ácido Láctico-Co-Glicólico)/Poliisopreno Para Aplicação Em Engenharia De Tecidos, 146 f. PhD Thesis, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Course, School of Engineering, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2015.
26. 10.4155/fmc.11.12310.4155/fmc.11.123 ↗
27. 10.1208/s12249-015-0304-210.1208/s12249-015-0304-2 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.4126910.1002/app.41269 ↗
29. 10.1177/155892501982820710.1177/1558925019828207 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.01110.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.011 ↗
31. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.2210.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.22 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.00510.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.005 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1110155010.3390/polym11101550 ↗
34. 10.1590/1678-4324-201917077510.1590/1678-4324-2019170775 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.4764310.1002/app.47643 ↗
36. 10.1557/jmr.2020.18910.1557/jmr.2020.189 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-016-0030-510.1007/s10853-016-0030-5 ↗
38. 10.1049/mnl.2014.047910.1049/mnl.2014.0479 ↗
39. 10.18494/SAM.2018.203410.18494/SAM.2018.2034 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.00510.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.005 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40430-018-1407-y10.1007/s40430-018-1407-y ↗
42. 10.1051/matecconf/2017950700310.1051/matecconf/20179507003 ↗
43. 10.1002/app.4748010.1002/app.47480 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cis.2018.05.00810.1016/j.cis.2018.05.008 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12279410.1016/j.polymer.2020.122794 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10853-008-3010-610.1007/s10853-008-3010-6 ↗
47. 10.1520/JTE10289610.1520/JTE102896 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jscs.2020.01.00210.1016/j.jscs.2020.01.002 ↗
49. 10.1002/jcp.2117510.1002/jcp.21175 ↗
50. 10.1002/app.4256610.1002/app.42566 ↗
51. 10.1371/journal.pone.007354510.1371/journal.pone.0073545 ↗
52. 10.1021/ja200895s10.1021/ja200895s ↗
53. 10.1002/marc.20190043010.1002/marc.201900430 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.00310.1016/j.smaim.2020.07.003 ↗
55. 10.1002/admi.20190057210.1002/admi.201900572 ↗
56. 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00046-110.1016/s0142-9612(01)00046-1 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.04710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.047 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.05910.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.059 ↗
59. 10.1039/d0bm00390e10.1039/d0bm00390e ↗
60. 10.1016/j.snr.2020.10000510.1016/j.snr.2020.100005 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.0c0044810.1021/acsami.0c00448 ↗