Microstructural, corrosion and mechanical properties of additively manufactured alloys: a review
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic alloys offers a new avenue to print objects having complex geometries. This exclusive benefit of AM has made it an alternative route to conventional manufacturing. Importantly, additively manufactured (AMed) alloys often exhibit improved microstructures, which may provide better properties. The microstructure of an alloy can be tuned by controlling the processing parameters. This study includes an overview of the processing parameters that can influence the microstructural, mechanical, and corrosion properties of AMed alloys. Moreover, the effects of heat treatment on AMed alloys are also discussed. Among various processing parameters, it is observed that the laser power significantly influences the microstructure. The microstructures produced with high laser power are similar to heat-treated samples for 316L stainless steel (SS) and Ti6Al4V. Similarly, variation in scanning speed results in distinct morphology of grains in Ti6Al4V. Moreover, different AM processes, such as SLM and EBM, produce coarse and fine β grains, respectively, in Ti6Al4V. The fabrication of AlSi10Mg yields various sizes of melt pool due to different scanning strategies. Furthermore, mechanical properties such as microhardness is higher and the yield strength is lower for Ti6Al4V fabricated at lower laser power. The corrosion behavior of SLMed Ti6Al4V is different on the perpendicular and parallel planes to the build direction. Due to the increase in grain size after heat treatment, the corrosion resistance of AMed Ti6Al4V and AlSi10Mg is reduced. In contrast, heat treatment applied on 316L, Ti6Al4V, AlSi10Mg, and Inconel 718 is beneficial for mechanical properties. After the development of materials with optimized processing parameters, the research should be conducted on replacement of the wrought alloys with the AMed alloys. It is expected that new applications such as fuel cells and biomedical devices will utilize the AM technology to build parts in the recent future.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering and Technology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA;
Department of Materials Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hai’l, Saudi Arabia;
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia;
Science of Advanced Materials, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Beddoes J. · 1999
2. Vanmeensel K. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 26110.1016/B978-0-12-812155-9.00008-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.03510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.035 ↗
6. Saint R. · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 110.1038/s41598-018-26455-9 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.00210.1016/j.addma.2015.07.002 ↗
8. Zhai Y. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 27 · 334
9. Majchrowicz K. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 765 · 13829010.1016/j.msea.2019.138290 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.32510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.325 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11639810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116398 ↗
12. Grigoriev A. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 704 · 43410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.086 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13820410.1016/j.msea.2019.138204 ↗
14. Luo J. P. · Mater. Sci. Eng. C · 2019
15. Yang C. L. · Mater. Des. · 2018
16. Zhou L. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2018
17. Xiong Z. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019
18. Zhao D. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019
19. Lejček P. · Mater. Charact. · 2019
20. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
21. Carluccio D. · J. Manuf. Process. · 2019
22. de Souza A. F. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 767 · 13842510.1016/j.msea.2019.138425 ↗
23. Zhai Y. · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2019 · 515 · 11110.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.12.028 ↗
24. Nguyen Q. B. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019
25. Salman O. O. · J. Manuf. Process. · 2019
26. Swathi Vunnam T. L. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019
27. Sarkar S. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019
28. Mazeeva A. K. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 814 · 15231510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152315 ↗
29. Mei X. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15166210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151662 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
32. Tang M. · Int. J. Fatigue · 125
33. Teixeira J. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 766 · 13839210.1016/j.msea.2019.138392 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.26710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.267 ↗
35. Hu Z. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019
36. Wang D. · Opt. Laser Technol. · 2020 · 121 · 10567810.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105678 ↗
37. Seki E. · Mater. Lett. · 2019
38. Xu Z. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019
39. Wang P. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020
40. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.10502510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.105025 ↗
41. Iveković A. · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2018
42. Proaño B. · Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. · 2019
43. Kong D. · Constr. Build. Mater. · 2019
44. Li J. N. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019
45. Lopez-Galilea I. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 30 · 100874
46. Chen Z. · Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. · 2018
47. Jadhav S. D. · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2019
48. Zhang S. · Powder Technol. · 2019
49. Chen Y. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019
50. Wen P. · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2018
51. Yakout M. · Solid State Phenom. · 2018 · 278 · 110.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.278.1 ↗
52. 10.1016/S2238-7854(12)70009-110.1016/S2238-7854(12)70009-1 ↗
53. Lober, L.; Biamino, S.; Ackelid, U.; Fino, P. Comparison of Selective Laser and Electron Beam Melted Titanium Aluminides. SFF Symposium, International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2011, 22, 547–556.
54. Peng H. · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 666 · 32010.1016/j.msea.2016.04.079 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.09810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.098 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10755210.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
57. Kong D. · NPJ Mater. Degrad. · 2019 · 310.1038/s41529-019-0086-1 ↗
58. 10.1108/1355254061070701310.1108/13552540610707013 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.02910.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.029 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.10.02610.1016/j.msea.2018.10.026 ↗
61. 10.1149/2.1481707jes10.1149/2.1481707jes ↗
62. Kong D. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019
63. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.01810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.018 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.08410.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.084 ↗
65. Magic 3D printing machine and 3D printing tools - BeAM Machines (n.d.). https://www.beam-machines.com/products/magic-3d-printing-machine (accessed January 24, 2019).
66. TruLaser Cell Series 7000 | TRUMPF (n.d.). https://www.trumpf.com/en_US/products/machines-systems/3d-laser-cutting/trulaser-cell-series-7000/ (accessed January 29, 2019).
67. LENS 1500 Systems (n.d.). https://www.optomec.com/3d-printed-metals/lens-printers/metal-component-repair-3d-printer/ (accessed January 29, 2019).
68. LMD/DMD Machines for 3D Metal Printing - Formalloy (n.d.). https://www.formalloy.com/products-services (accessed January 29, 2019).
69. LASERTEC 65 3D hybrid - ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING machines from DMG MORI (n.d.). https://us.dmgmori.com/products/machines/additive-manufacturing/powder-nozzle/lasertec-65-3d-hybrid (accessed January 29, 2019).
70. Insstek (n.d.). http://www.insstek.com/content/standard/mxgrande (accessed January 29, 2019).
71. Largest Metal 3D Printer Available | Industrial 3D Printing | Sciaky (n.d.). https://www.sciaky.com/largest-metal-3d-printer-available (accessed October 14, 2019).
72. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.03210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.032 ↗
73. 10.1007/s00170-015-7077-310.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.12.00210.1016/j.addma.2014.12.002 ↗
75. 10.1179/0032589915Z.00000000024410.1179/0032589915Z.000000000244 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.04010.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.040 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.02.00310.1016/j.addma.2016.02.003 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.13510.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.135 ↗
79. 10.1007/s40684-017-0037-710.1007/s40684-017-0037-7 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
81. 10.1002/jor.2307510.1002/jor.23075 ↗
82. Wysocki B. · Appl. Sci. · 2017 · 7 · 62010.3390/app7070657 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.00110.1016/j.addma.2018.07.001 ↗
84. Junk S. · Proc. CIRP · 2019 · 84 · 27710.1016/j.procir.2019.04.277 ↗
85. Betatype (n.d.). http://research.betaty.pe/ (accessed January 9, 2019.
86. Zhou M. · Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. · 2019 · 353 · 2410.1016/j.cma.2019.03.054 ↗
87. Morgan D. · Procedia Manuf. · 2017 · 10 · 81910.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.083 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.09910.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.099 ↗
89. Software Solution Simufact Additive - simufact (n.d.). https://www.simufact.com/simufact-additive.html (accessed September 25, 2019).
90. Additive Manufacturing Simulation | ANSYS (n.d.). https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/additive-manufacturing (accessed September 26, 2019).
91. Software for laser powder bed fusion (metal 3D printing) systems (n.d.). https://www.renishaw.com/en/software-for-laser-powder-bed-fusion-metal-3d-printing-systems–15255 (accessed January 9, 2019.
92. STL Editor | STL Fixing Software | Materialise Magics (n.d.). https://www.materialise.com/en/software/magics (accessed January 16, 2019).
93. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.01.00310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2018.01.003 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.04210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.05.042 ↗
95. Yan M. · 2015
96. Montero-Sistiaga M. L. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 23 · 402
97. Qiu C. · Addit. Manuf · 2019 · 30 · 100893
98. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.00610.1016/j.matdes.2018.12.006 ↗
99. Kumar S. · Compr. Mater. Process. · 2014 · 9310.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01003-7 ↗
100. Esmaeilizadeh R. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 812 · 15209710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152097 ↗