journal article·2023-04

A Review on Electrospinning as Versatile Supports for Diverse Nanofibers and Their Applications in Environmental Sensing

Jialing Song, Xuanhao Lin, Liang Ying Ee, Sam Fong Yau Li, Manhong Huang

Advanced Fiber Materials· Volume 5· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

This study was carried out on 53 milk samples positive for California Mastitis Test taken from eight herds infected with clinical mastitis in Taif City. Mean Somatic cell Count (SCC) was 4, 482, 000 cells / ml. Forty-eight (51.06%) E .coli strains were isolated from bovine mastitic milk by bacteriological methods. \nFrom these E .coli strains, 27 were characterized with regard to their serotype and their DNA polymorphism pattern with REP and ERIC primers, special attention was given to recurrent E .coli mastitis in cows . For studying the epidemiology of clinical E . coli mastitis, the combination of serotype and DNA pattern detected , was used in this investigation .It was assured that the PCR reaction with the ERIC primers can be used in the field of E. coli strains identification. Based on the DNA polymorphisms patterns of E. coli isolates from clinical mastitic cows , it revealed that isolates have a great variations in regard to their genotypes. \nDuring the same lactation period, it was detected more than one clinical mastitis case associated with E . coli, but this clinical mastitic occurrence was irregularly. Whatever the occurrence, at this rate, E . coli strains isolated from the separate episodes of inflammation, were for the most part, of the same serotype and had the same DNA amplification pattern. Therefore, the PCR DNA amplification method can not replace serotyping in epidemiological studies .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows · Probiotics and Fermented Foods · Microbial infections and disease research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Liang LW, Wang ZB, Li JX. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. J Clean Prod 2019;237:117649.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649 ↗
2. Chowdhary P, Raj A, Bharagava RN. Environmental pollution and health hazards from distillery wastewater and treatment approaches to combat the environmental threats: a review. Chemosphere 2018;194:229.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.163 ↗
3. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Frontiers Public Health 2020;8:14.10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 ↗
4. Novo A, Andre S, Viana P, Nunes OC, Manaia CM. Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial residues and bacterial community composition in urban wastewater. Water Res 1875;2013:47.
5. Cheng DL, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Liu YW, Wei Q, Wei D. A critical review on antibiotics and hormones in swine wastewater: water pollution problems and control approaches. J Hazard Mater 2020;387:121682.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121682 ↗
6. Cacace D, Fatta-Kassinos D, Manaia CM, Cytryn E, Kreuzinger N, Rizzo L, Karaolia P, Schwartz T, Alexander J, Merlin C, Garelick H, Schmitt H, de Vries D, Schwermer CU, Meric S, Ozkal CB, Pons MN, Kneis D, Berendonk TU. Antibiotic resistance genes in treated wastewater and in the receiving water bodies: a pan-European survey of urban settings. Water Res 2019;162:320.10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.039 ↗
7. Sutka A, Gross KA. Spinel ferrite oxide semiconductor gas sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 2016;222:95.10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.027 ↗
8. Fang X, Zong BY, Mao S. Metal-organic framework-based sensors for environmental contaminant sensing. Nano Micro Lett 2018;10:92–110.10.1007/s40820-018-0218-0 ↗
9. Li M, Gou HL, Al-Ogaidi I, Wu NQ. Nanostructured sensors for detection of heavy metals: a review. Acs Sustain Chem Eng 2013;1:713.10.1021/sc400019a ↗
10. Qi YY, Chen YT, Xiu FR, Hou JX. An aptamer-based colorimetric sensing of acetamiprid in environmental samples: convenience, sensitivity and practicability. Sens Actuators B Chem 2020;304:127359.1–127359.8.10.1016/j.snb.2019.127359 ↗
11. Zhu L, Wang JN, Liu JW, Nasir MS, Zhu JW, Li SS, Liang JD, Yan W. Smart formaldehyde detection enabled by metal organic framework-derived doped electrospun hollow nanofibers. Sens Actuators B Chem 2021;326:128819.10.1016/j.snb.2020.128819 ↗
12. Ding JX, Zhang J, Li JN, Li D, Xiao CS, Xiao HH, Yang HH, Zhuang XL, Chen XS. Electrospun polymer biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 2019;90:1.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.01.002 ↗
13. Wang XX, Yu GF, Zhang J, Yu M, Ramakrishna S, Long YZ. Conductive polymer ultrafine fibers via electrospinning: preparation, physical properties and applications. Prog Mater Sci 2021;115:100704.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100704 ↗
14. Chen SX, Li RQ, Li XR, Xie JW. Electrospinning: an enabling nanotechnology platform for drug delivery and regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018;132:188.10.1016/j.addr.2018.05.001 ↗
15. Ghosal K, Agatemor C, Spitalsky Z, Thomas S, Kny E. Electrospinning tissue engineering and wound dressing scaffolds from polymer-titanium dioxide nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 2019;358:1262.10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.117 ↗
16. Liu Q, Zhu JH, Zhang LW, Qiu YJ. Recent advances in energy materials by electrospinning. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 1825;2018:81.
17. Sun B, Long YZ, Zhang HD, Li MM, Duvail JL, Jiang XY, Yin HL. Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Prog Polym Sci 2014;39:862.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.002 ↗
18. Greiner A, Wendorff JH. Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibres. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007;46:5670.10.1002/anie.200604646 ↗
19. Li D, Xia YN. Electrospinning of nanofibers: reinventing the wheel? Adv Mater 2004;16:1151.10.1002/adma.200400719 ↗
20. Xue JJ, Wu T, Dai YQ, Xia YN. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications. Chem Rev 2019;119:5298.10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 ↗
21. Ahmed FE, Lalia BS, Hashaikeh R. A review on electrospinning for membrane fabrication: challenges and applications. Desalination 2015;356:15.10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.033 ↗
22. Zhang H, Liu YN, Cui K, Zhao QL, Huang J, Mao SH, Jiang T, Ma Z. Electrospun ribbon-like microfiber films of a novel guanidine-based ABA triblock copolymer: fabrication, antibacterial activity, and cytotoxicity. Macromol Chem Phys 2019;220:1900138.10.1002/macp.201900138 ↗
23. Gangolphe L, Leon-Valdivieso CY, Nottelet B, Dejean S, Bethry A, Pinese C, Bossard F, Garric X. Electrospun microstructured PLA-based scaffolds featuring relevant anisotropic, mechanical and degradation characteristics for soft tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021;129:112339.10.1016/j.msec.2021.112339 ↗
24. Liang M, Hebraud A, Sutter C, Bardin A, Lobry E, Schlatter G. Measurement and modeling of the nanofiber surface potential during electrospinning on a patterned collector: toward directed 3D microstructuration. Adv Mater Interfaces 2021;8:2101302.10.1002/admi.202101302 ↗
25. Park SH, Kim MS, Lee B, Park JH, Lee HJ, Lee NK, Jeon NL, Suh KY. Creation of a hybrid scaffold with dual configuration of aligned and random electrospun fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8:2826.10.1021/acsami.5b11529 ↗
26. Shin MK, Kim SI, Kim SJ. Controlled assembly of polymer nanofibers: from helical springs to fully extended. Appl Phys Lett 2006;88:223109.10.1063/1.2208689 ↗
27. Kongkhlang T, Kotaki M, Kousaka Y, Umemura T, Nakaya D, Chirachanchai S. Electrospun polyoxymethylene: spinning conditions and its consequent nanoporous nanofiber. Macromolecules 2008;41:4746.10.1021/ma800731r ↗
28. Park KR, Cho HB, Lee J, Song Y, Kim WB, Choa YH. Design of highly porous SnO2–CuO nanotubes for enhancing H2S gas sensor performance. Sens Actuators B Chem 2020;302:127179.10.1016/j.snb.2019.127179 ↗
29. Lin MF, Xiong JQ, Wang JX, Parida K, Lee PS. Core-shell nanofiber mats for tactile pressure sensor and nanogenerator applications. Nano Energy 2018;44:248.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.004 ↗
30. Wang LG, Topham PD, Mykhaylyk OO, Yu H, Ryan AJ, Fairclough JPA, Bras W. Self-assembly-driven electrospinning: the transition from fibers to intact beaded morphologies. Macromol Rapid Commun 2015;36:1437.10.1002/marc.201500149 ↗
31. Zhang CL, Yu SH. Nanoparticles meet electrospinning: recent advances and future prospects. Chem Soc Rev 2014;43:4423.10.1039/c3cs60426h ↗
32. Mercante LA, Scagion VP, Migliorini FL, Mattoso LHC, Correa DS. Electrospinning-based (bio)sensors for food and agricultural applications: a review. Trac Trends Anal Chem 2017;91:91.10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.004 ↗
33. Li D, Wang YL, Xia YN. Electrospinning of polymeric and ceramic nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays. Nano Lett 2003;3:1167.10.1021/nl0344256 ↗
34. Baji A, Mai YW, Wong SC, Abtahi M, Chen P. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: effects on oriented morphology, structures and tensile properties. Compos Sci Technol 2010;70:703.10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010 ↗
35. Agarwal S, Greiner A, Wendorff JH. Functional materials by electrospinning of polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2013;38:963.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.001 ↗
36. Ding YC, Hou HQ, Zhao Y, Zhu ZT, Fong H. Electrospun polyimide nanofibers and their applications. Prog Polym Sci 2016;61:67.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.06.006 ↗
37. Thakkar S, Misra M. Electrospun polymeric nanofibers: new horizons in drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 2017;107:148.10.1016/j.ejps.2017.07.001 ↗
38. Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 2010;28:325.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
39. Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Tan NCB. The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 2001;42:261.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-0 ↗
40. Cheng J, Jun Y, Qin JH, Lee SH. Electrospinning versus microfluidic spinning of functional fibers for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2017;114:121.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.040 ↗
41. Rutledge GC, Fridrikh SV. Formation of fibers by electrospinning. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:1384.10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.020 ↗
42. Frenot A, Chronakis IS. Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2003;8:64.10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00004-9 ↗
43. Greiner A, Wendorff JH. Functional Self-Assembled Nanofibers by Electrospinning. In: Shimizu T, editor. Self-assembled nanomaterials I: nanofibers. Advances in Polymer Science, 2008. p. 107.10.1007/12_2008_146 ↗
44. Wang XM, Sun FZ, Yin GC, Wang YT, Liu B, Dong MD. Tactile-sensing based on flexible PVDF nanofibers via electrospinning: a review. Sensors 2018;18:330.10.3390/s18020330 ↗
45. Luo CJ, Stoyanov SD, Stride E, Pelan E, Edirisinghe M. Electrospinning versus fibre production methods: from specifics to technological convergence. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:4708.10.1039/c2cs35083a ↗
46. Chen K, Chou WM, Liu LC, Cui YH, Xue P, Jia MY. Electrochemical sensors fabricated by electrospinning technology: an overview. Sensors 2019;19:3676.10.3390/s19173676 ↗
47. Reneker DH, Chun I. Nanometre diameter fibres of polymer, produced by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 1996;7:216.10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 ↗
48. Mit-uppatham C, Nithitanakul M, Supaphol P. Ultratine electrospun polyamide-6 fibers: effect of solution conditions on morphology and average fiber diameter. Macromol Chem Phys 2004;205:2327.10.1002/macp.200400225 ↗
49. Saad EM, El Gohary NA, El-Shenawy BM, Handoussa H, Klingner A, Elwi M, Hamed Y, Khalil ISM, El Nashar RM, Mizaikoff B. Fabrication of magnetic molecularly imprinted beaded fibers for rosmarinic acid. Nanomaterials 2020;10:1478.10.3390/nano10081478 ↗
50. Vicente A, Rivero PJ, Palacio JF, Rodriguez R. The role of the fiber/bead hierarchical microstructure on the properties of PVDF coatings deposited by electrospinning. Polymers 2021;13:464.10.3390/polym13030464 ↗
51. Lee KH, Zhang SP, Lodge TP, Frisbie CD. Electrical impedance of spin-coatable ion gel films. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:3315.10.1021/jp110166u ↗
52. Schwartz G, Tee BCK, Mei JG, Appleton AL, Kim DH, Wang HL, Bao ZN. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat Commun 2013;4:1859.10.1038/ncomms2832 ↗
53. Fujimoto T, Awaga K. Electric-double-layer field-effect transistors with ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013;15:8983.10.1039/c3cp50755f ↗
54. Nie BQ, Li RY, Cao J, Brandt JD, Pan TR. Flexible transparent iontronic film for interfacial capacitive pressure sensing. Adv Mater 2015;27:6055.10.1002/adma.201502556 ↗
55. Yuk H, Zhang T, Parada GA, Liu XY, Zhao XH. Skin-inspired hydrogel-elastomer hybrids with robust interfaces and functional microstructures. Nat Commun 2016;7:12028.10.1038/ncomms12028 ↗
56. Liu DP, Shi QQ, Jin S, Shao YL, Huang J. Self-assembled core-shell structured organic nanofibers fabricated by single-nozzle electrospinning for highly sensitive ammonia sensors. Infomat 2019;1:525.10.1002/inf2.12036 ↗
57. Chartuprayoon N, Zhang ML, Bosze W, Choa YH, Myung NV. One-dimensional nanostructures based bio-detection. Biosens Bioelectron 2015;63:432.10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.043 ↗
58. Fan HJ, Gosele U, Zacharias M. Formation of nanotubes and hollow nanoparticles based on Kirkendall and diffusion processes: a review. Small 2007;3:1660.10.1002/smll.200700382 ↗
59. Liu RR, Hou LL, Yue GC, Li HK, Zhang JS, Liu J, Miao BB, Wang N, Bai J, Cui ZM, Liu TX, Zhao Y. Progress of fabrication and applications of electrospun hierarchically porous nanofibers. Adv Fiber Mater 2022;4:604.10.1007/s42765-022-00132-z ↗
60. Xu F, Yang J, Dong RZ, Jiang HX, Wang CH, Liu WL, Jiang ZX, Zhang XQ, Zhu GD. Wave-shaped piezoelectric nanofiber membrane nanogenerator for acoustic detection and recognition. Adv Fiber Mater 2021;3:368.10.1007/s42765-021-00095-7 ↗
61. Kang SX, Zhao K, Yu DG, Zheng XL, Huang CX. Advances in biosensing and environmental monitoring based on electrospun nanofibers. Adv Fiber Mater 2022;4:404.10.1007/s42765-021-00129-0 ↗
62. Liu PC, Zhu YZ, Ma JH, Yang SG, Gong JH, Xu J. Preparation of continuous porous alumina nanofibers with hollow structure by single capillary electrospinning. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 2013;436:489.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.07.023 ↗
63. Ma GP, Yang DZ, Nie J. Preparation of porous ultrafine polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers by electrospinning. Polym Adv Technol 2009;20:147.10.1002/pat.1180 ↗
64. Scampicchio M, Arecchi A, Lawrence NS, Mannino S. Nylon nanofibrous membrane for mediated glucose biosensing. Sens Actuators B Chem 2010;145:394.10.1016/j.snb.2009.12.042 ↗
65. Wanekaya AK, Chen W, Myung NV, Mulchandani A. Nanowire-based electrochemical biosensors. Electroanalysis 2006;18:533.10.1002/elan.200503449 ↗
66. Miller MR, Shaw CA, Langrish JP. From particles to patients: oxidative stress and the cardiovascular effects of air pollution. Future Cardiol 2012;8:577.10.2217/fca.12.43 ↗
67. Glencross DA, Ho TR, Camilla N, Hawrylowicz CM, Pfeffer PE. Air pollution and its effects on the immune system. Free Radic Biol Med 2020;151:56.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.01.179 ↗
68. Mahajan S, Jagtap S. Metal-oxide semiconductors for carbon monoxide (CO) gas sensing: a review. Appl Mater Today 2019;18:100483.10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100483 ↗
69. Zhang ZB, Xue T, Jin XY. Effects of meteorological conditions and air pollution on COVID-19 transmission: evidence from 219 Chinese cities. Sci Total Environ 2020;741:140244.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140244 ↗
70. Mirzaei A, Leonardi SG, Neri G. Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: a review. Ceram Int 2016;42:15119.10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.145 ↗
71. Kumar P, Deep A, Kim KH, Brown RJC. Coordination polymers: opportunities and challenges for monitoring volatile organic compounds. Prog Polym Sci 2015;45:102.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.01.002 ↗
72. Heft-Neal S, Burney J, Bendavid E, Burke M. Robust relationship between air quality and infant mortality in Africa. Nature 2018;559:254.10.1038/s41586-018-0263-3 ↗
73. Nikfarjam A, Hosseini S, Salehifar N. Fabrication of a highly sensitive single aligned TiO2 and gold nanoparticle embedded TiO2 nano-fiber gas sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9:15662.10.1021/acsami.6b15554 ↗
74. Su HY, Li H, Lin H, Shi XW, Du YM, Luo Y, Deng HB. Highly sensitive formaldehyde sensors based on CuO/ZnO composite nanofibrous mats using porous cellulose acetate fibers as templates. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;206:653.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.167 ↗
75. Wang N, Wang XF, Jia YT, Li XQ, Yu JY, Ding B. Electrospun nanofibrous chitosan membranes modified with polyethyleneimine for formaldehyde detection. Carbohyd Polym 2014;108:192.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.088 ↗
76. Zou YD, Zhou XR, Zhu YH, Cheng XW, Zhao DY, Deng YH. sp2-Hybridized carbon-containing block copolymer templated synthesis of mesoporous semiconducting metal oxides with excellent gas sensing property. Acc Chem Res 2019;52:714.10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00598 ↗
77. Ma JH, Ren Y, Zhou XR, Liu LL, Zhu YH, Cheng XW, Xu PC, Li XX, Deng YH, Zhao DY. Pt nanoparticles sensitized ordered mesoporous WO3 semiconductor: gas sensing performance and mechanism study. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1705268.10.1002/adfm.201705268 ↗
78. Yang YR, Gao W. Wearable and flexible electronics for continuous molecular monitoring. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48:1465.10.1039/C7CS00730B ↗
79. Yao MS, Lv XJ, Fu ZH, Li WH, Deng WH, Wu GD, Xu G. Layer-by-layer assembled conductive metal-organic framework nanofilms for room-temperature chemiresistive sensing. Angew Chem Int Ed 2017;56:16510.10.1002/anie.201709558 ↗
80. Nasri A, Petrissans M, Fierro V, Celzard A. Gas sensing based on organic composite materials: review of sensor types, progresses and challenges. Mater Sci Semicond Process 2021;128:105744.10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105744 ↗
81. Srinivasan P, Ezhilan M, Kulandaisamy AJ, Babu KJ, Rayappan JBB. Room temperature chemiresistive gas sensors: challenges and strategies—a mini review. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2019;30:15825.10.1007/s10854-019-02025-1 ↗
82. Majhi SM, Mirzaei A, Kim HW, Kim SS, Kim TW. Recent advances in energy-saving chemiresistive gas sensors: a review. Nano Energy 2021;79:105369.10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105369 ↗
83. UlAbideen Z, Kim JH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Mirzaei A, Kim HW, Kim SS. Electrospun metal oxide composite nanofibers gas sensors: a review. J Korean Ceram Soc 2017;54:366.10.4191/kcers.2017.54.5.12 ↗
84. Kim HJ, Lee JH. Highly sensitive and selective gas sensors using p-type oxide semiconductors: overview. Sens Actuators B Chem 2014;192:607.10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.005 ↗
85. Xu HY, Ju DX, Chen ZR, Han R, Zhai T, Yu HQ, Liu CY, Wu XW, Wang JQ, Cao BQ. A novel hetero-structure sensor based on Au/Mg-doped TiO2/SnO2 nanosheets directly grown on Al2O3 ceramic tubes. Sens Actuators B Chem 2018;273:328.10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.055 ↗
86. Wang C, Wang YL, Cheng PF, Xu LP, Dang F, Wang TL, Lei ZH. In-situ generated TiO2/alpha-Fe2O3 heterojunction arrays for batch manufacturing of conductometric acetone gas sensors. Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical. 2021, 340.10.1016/j.snb.2021.129926 ↗
87. Liang QH, Zou XX, Chen H, Fan MH, Li GD. High-performance formaldehyde sensing realized by alkaline-earth metals doped In2O3 nanotubes with optimized surface properties. Sens Actuators B Chem 2020;304:127241.10.1016/j.snb.2019.127241 ↗
88. Kou XY, Meng FQ, Chen K, Wang TS, Sun P, Liu FM, Yan X, Sun YF, Liu FM, Shimanoe K, Lu GY. High-performance acetone gas sensor based on Ru-doped SnO2 nanofibers. Sens Actuators B Chem 2020;320:128292.10.1016/j.snb.2020.128292 ↗
89. Trung TQ, Duy LT, Ramasundaram S, Lee NE. Transparent, stretchable, and rapid-response humidity sensor for body-attachable wearable electronics. Nano Res 2021;2017:10.
90. Han CH, Li XW, Shao CL, Li XH, Ma JG, Zhang XT, Liu YC. Composition-controllable p-CuO/n-ZnO hollow nanofibers for high-performance H2S detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 2019;285:495.10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.077 ↗
91. Zhang R, Cao S, Zhou TT, Fei T, Wang R, Zhang T. Rational design and tunable synthesis of Co3O4 nanoparticle-incorporating into In2O3 one-dimensional ribbon as effective sensing material for gas detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 2020;310:127695.10.1016/j.snb.2020.127695 ↗
92. Li XW, Han CH, Lu DX, Shao CL, Li XH, Liu YC. Highly electron-depleted ZnO/ZnFe2O4/Au hollow meshes as an advanced material for gas sensing application. Sens Actuators B Chem 2019;297:126769.10.1016/j.snb.2019.126769 ↗
93. Zhang M, Sui N, Wang R, Zhang T. The effect of shell thickness on gas sensing properties of core-shell fibers. Sens Actuators B Chem 2021;332:129456.10.1016/j.snb.2021.129456 ↗
94. Filippidou MK, Chatzichristidi M, Chatzandroulis S. A fabrication process of flexible IDE capacitive chemical sensors using a two step lift-off method based on PVA patterning. Sens Actuators B Chem 2019;284:7.10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.095 ↗
95. Rivadeneyra A, Fernandez-Salmeron J, Banqueri J, Lopez-Villanueva JA, Capitan-Vallvey LF, Palma AJ. A novel electrode structure compared with interdigitated electrodes as capacitive sensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 2014;204:552.10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.010 ↗
96. Bulemo PM, Kim DH, Kim ID. Controlled synthesis of electrospun hollow Pt-loaded SnO2 microbelts for acetone sensing. Sens Actuators B Chem 2021;344:130208.10.1016/j.snb.2021.130208 ↗
97. Zhao LB, Zhao YH, Xia Y, Li ZK, Li J, Zhang JW, Wang JH, Zhou XY, Li YJ, Zhao YL, Jiang ZD. A novel CMUT-based resonant biochemical sensor using electrospinning technology. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2019;66:7356.10.1109/TIE.2018.2878123 ↗
98. Bai X, Lv H, Liu Z, Chen JK, Wang J, Sun BH, Zhang Y, Wang RH, Shi KY. Thin-layered MoS2 nanoflakes vertically grown on SnO2 nanotubes as highly effective room-temperature NO2 gas sensor. J Hazard Mater 2021;416:125830.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125830 ↗
99. Zhao DW, Zhu Y, Cheng WK, Chen WS, Wu YQ, Yu HP. Cellulose-based flexible functional materials for emerging intelligent electronics. Adv Mater 2021;33:2000619.10.1002/adma.202000619 ↗
100. Yang LY, Xu XR, Liu MD, Chen C, Cui J, Chen X, Wu K, Sun DP. Wearable and flexible bacterial cellulose/polyaniline ammonia sensor based on a synergistic doping strategy. Sens Actuators B Chem 2021;334:129647.10.1016/j.snb.2021.129647 ↗