Machine Learning‐Supported Analysis for Predicting and Visualizing Nonlinear Relationships Between Material Properties in Electroplated Chromium Layers
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to employ a machine learning (ML)‐based regression model that accurately captures nonlinear relationships between electroplating process parameters and chromium thickness, while enabling the interpretation and visualization of these nonlinear effects. For this purpose, two statistically distinct datasets from laboratory‐scale (1L) and pilot‐scale (14L) experiments were analyzed. Hyperparameter tuning and fivefold cross‐validation are used for training to make the results robust and transparent for different data constellations. Several models were evaluated and achieved coefficients of determination () of up to 75%, often outperforming linear regression (LR) due to nonlinear parameter interactions. Model performance varied depending on the dataset, with no single ML approach proving universally superior. For the entire dataset, the CatBoost model achieved the best result with an average of 70.5%. A deeper analysis of the data was performed using SHAP, permutation importance, and global feature importance. To visualize potential nonlinear relationships, a partial dependence analysis was conducted to assess the influence of individual process parameters. This analysis confirmed the presence of specific nonlinear dependencies for several parameters in relation to chromium thickness. The correlations among the process parameters identified in this study are highly relevant for industrial bath management and process optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrochemistry and Electroplating Group Technische Universität Ilmenau Ilmenau Germany
Chair of Hybrid Intelligence Helmut‐Schmidt‐University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg Hamburg Germany
Funding
BMBF
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Electroplating in the Modern Era, Improvements and Challenges: A Review10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100286 ↗
2. The Electrochemical Reduction Mechanism of Trivalent Chromium in the Presence of Formic Acid10.1016/j.elecom.2008.11.055 ↗
3. Current Efficiency and Polarization Behavior of Trivalent Chromium Electrodeposition Process10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00678-3 ↗
4. Chemistry & Theory of Chromium Deposition: Part I – Chemistry. Plating and Surface Finishing
5. Electrochemical Characterization of Chromium Deposition from Trivalent Solutions for Decorative Applications by EQCM and Near‐Surface pH Measurements10.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.011 ↗
6. Investigation of the Reaction Kinetics of Chromium(III) Ions with Carboxylic Acids In Aqueous Solutions and the Associated Effects on Chromium Deposition10.1149/1945-7111/abd1f4 ↗
7. A Review on Electrodeposition and Tribological Performance of Chromium‐Based Coatings from Eco‐Friendly Trivalent Chromium Baths10.1007/s44373-025-00037-7 ↗
8. Microstructure and Properties of Carbon–Sulfur‐Containing Chromium Deposits Electroplated in Trivalent Chromium Baths with Thiosalicylic Acid10.1016/j.electacta.2012.03.168 ↗
9. Effect of Ni2+ on Chromium Electrodeposition in Cr(III) Plating Bath
10. Relation between Color and Surface Morphology of Electrodeposited Chromium for Decorative Applications10.1149/2.0871906jes ↗
11. Corrosion Resistance of Electroplated Coatings Based on Chromium Trivalent‐Baths10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.130616 ↗
12. Deep Learning‐Based Identification of Electrodeposition Time: A Case Study Using Synthetic Images of Copper Coatings10.1007/s00170-025-15671-z ↗
13. Modeling and Simulation of Electrodeposition: Effect of Electrolyte Conductivity, Current Density and Ion Transport on Electroplating Thickness
14. Technological Advances in Electropating: Artificial Intelligence to Predict Zinc Coating Thickness on SAE 1008 Low Carbon Steels
15. The Prediction of the ZnNi Thickness and Ni% of ZnNi Alloy Electroplating Using a Machine Learning Method10.1080/00202967.2021.1898183 ↗
16. Chrome Layer Thickness Modelling in a Hard Chromium Plating Process Using a Hybrid PSO/RBF–SVM‐Based Model10.9781/ijimai.2020.11.004 ↗
17. Machine Learning‐Based Multi‐Objective Optimization Framework for Industrial Black Nickel Electroplating10.1007/s10845-025-02573-w ↗
18. The Optimization of Nickel Electroplating Process Parameters with Artificial Intelligence Methods10.1007/s10800-023-01892-1 ↗
19. Ensemble Analysis of Parameters Optimizations of Copper Electroplated NiTinol Plate through Matlab and Robotic Swarm Particle10.1016/j.jalmes.2025.100225 ↗
20. Hardness Prediction of Electrodeposited Ni‐W Alloy Coatings Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112018 ↗
21. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
22. Breiman L. · 1984
23. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
24. Gradient Boosting Machines, A Tutorial10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
25. T.ChenandC.Guestrin “XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System ” inKnowledge Discovery and Data Mining Association for Computing Machinery(2016):785–794.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
26. L.Prokhorenkova G.Gusev A.Vorobev A. V.Dorogush andA.Gulin ”CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features “Advances in neural information processing system(2018).
27. A. V.Dorogush A.Gulin G.Gusev N.Kazeev L. O.Prokhorenkova andA.Vorobev Fighting Biases with Dynamic Boosting (2017) abs/1706.09516.
28. Blending Physical Knowledge with Mathematical Form in Physics Problem Solving
29. A Hybrid Predictive Approach for Chromium Layer Thickness in the Hard Chromium Plating Process Based on the Differential Evolution/Gradient Boosted Regression Tree Methodology10.3390/math8060959 ↗
30. S. M.LundbergandS. I.Lee “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions ” inNeural Information Processing Systems(Curran Associates Inc 2017):4768–4777.
31. Machine Learning and Shapley Additive Explanation‐Based Interpretable Prediction of the Electrocatalytic Performance of N‐Doped Carbon Materials10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129469 ↗
32. Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Materials Science and Chemistry10.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 ↗
33. Kinetics and Mechanism of Electrochemical Reactions Occurring during the Chromium Electrodeposition from Electrolytes Based on Cr(III) Compounds: A Literature Review10.3390/reactions4030024 ↗
34. Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
35. Scikit‐Learn: Machine Learning in Python
36. The Impact of Feature Scaling in Machine Learning: Effects on Regression and Classification Tasks10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3635541 ↗
37. T.Akiba S.Sano T.Yanase T.Ohta andM.Koyama “Optuna: A Next‐Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework ” inKnowledge Discovery and Data Mining Association for Computing Machinery(2019):2623–2631.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
38. A Robust Coefficient of Determination for Regression10.1016/j.jspi.2010.01.008 ↗
39. Root‐Mean‐Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE): When to use Them or Not10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022 ↗
40. The Coefficient of Determination R‐Squared Is More Informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in Regression Analysis Evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗