journal article·2026-06-14

Assessment of Sb Content on Solidification Behavior, Microstructure, and Hardness of Zn‐Sb Alloys

João Raffael Dias da Silva, Cássia Carla de Carvalho, Pâmella Raffaela Dantas de Freitas, Raí Batista de Sousa, Jeverton Laureano Paixão, José Eduardo Spinelli, Bismarck Luiz Silva

Publisher page

Abstract

Zn‐Sb systems show promise for soldering applications, yet detailed studies on their solidification remain scarce. Sb was chosen for its properties, availability, and cost, though its effect on solidification and eutectic morphology is still unclear. The present work investigates the effect of antimony (Sb) on the macrostructural and microstructural evolution, thermal parameters (cooling rate—Ṫ, growth rate for liquidus isotherm— V L and eutectic front— V E ), macrosegregation, and hardness in directionally solidified binary Zn‐1.0 wt.%Sb, Zn‐2.0 wt.%Sb, and Zn‐4.0 wt.%Sb alloys under nonequilibrium conditions. The samples were characterized by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray fluorescence (XRF), and X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and Vickers hardness (HV) tests. Thermodynamic calculations were performed by the CALPHAD method using Thermo‐Calc software to obtain information such as transformation temperatures, solidification paths, predicted phases, and their fractions. Increasing the Sb content to 4.0 wt.% suppressed the columnar growth observed at lower Sb levels (1–2 wt.%), as the higher solute concentration enhanced constitutional supercooling ahead of the solid–liquid interface, thereby promoting the nucleation of equiaxed grains and leading to a fully equiaxed macrostructure. The Zn‐1.0 wt.%Sb and Zn‐2.0 wt.%Sb alloys showed Zn‐rich dendrites surrounded by a Zn + Zn 4 Sb 3 eutectic with a fibrous morphology. Zn 4 Sb 3 plates appeared at cooling rates below 2.80°C/s and 2.2°C/s, respectively. The Zn‐4.0 wt.%Sb alloy displayed a Zn + Zn 4 Sb 3 eutectic with fibrous intermetallics and plate formation at Ṫ < 2.90°C/s, together with primary idiomorphic Zn 4 Sb 3 particles, indicating a hypereutectic composition. In general, for all three alloys, cooling rates below 2.2°C/s favored the formation of Zn 4 Sb 3 plates. It is noted that the Zn‐4.0 wt.%Sb alloy has a quasieutectic composition, diverging from previous observations in the literature. The increase from 1%Sb to 2%Sb did not promote changes in the scale of the dendritic arrangement, but with the 4%Sb content, a refinement of the fibrous eutectic spacing was observed compared to the other two compositions, in addition to a decrease in the liquidus and solidus temperatures. The increase in Sb content caused an increase in HV, due to the microstructural refinement (refined eutectic arrangement) and the higher fraction of the Zn 4 Sb 3 hardening phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes · Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN Natal Brazil

Department of Materials Engineering Federal University of São Carlos, UFSCar São Carlos Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Puttlitz K. J. · 200410.1201/9780203021484 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.25210.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.252 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11837‐009‐0013‐y10.1007/s11837‐009‐0013‐y ↗
4. 10.1007/s11664‐013‐2873‐810.1007/s11664‐013‐2873‐8 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.07210.1016/j.mee.2010.12.072 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10854‐018‐9956‐510.1007/s10854‐018‐9956‐5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.02.01810.1016/j.microrel.2012.02.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.19510.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.195 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00355‐810.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00355‐8 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10854‐016‐4896‐410.1007/s10854‐016‐4896‐4 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10854‐015‐4198‐210.1007/s10854‐015‐4198‐2 ↗
12. 10.2320/matertrans.MF20080910.2320/matertrans.MF200809 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.51810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.795.518 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.physb.2003.11.09610.1016/j.physb.2003.11.096 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1452‐3981(23)17106‐910.1016/S1452‐3981(23)17106‐9 ↗
16. 10.5923/j.materials.20150505.0110.5923/j.materials.20150505.01 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10854‐024‐13013‐510.1007/s10854‐024‐13013‐5 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1710223310.3390/ma17102233 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1003‐6326(22)66021‐710.1016/S1003‐6326(22)66021‐7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.03.09710.1016/j.jallcom.2008.03.097 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12877910.1016/j.matlet.2020.128779 ↗
22. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.100726010.3389/fenrg.2022.1007260 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.479584010.1063/1.4795840 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0925‐8388(03)00074‐410.1016/S0925‐8388(03)00074‐4 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.20210.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.202 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtener.2017.02.00510.1016/j.mtener.2017.02.005 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja410605f10.1021/ja410605f ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.05110.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.051 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.03510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.035 ↗
30. On the Transformations of the Intermetallic Phases in the Antimoine‐Zinc System
31. 10.1016/S0364‐5916(02)00008‐110.1016/S0364‐5916(02)00008‐1 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11669‐008‐9315‐y10.1007/s11669‐008‐9315‐y ↗
33. 10.1016/S0921‐5093(01)01649‐510.1016/S0921‐5093(01)01649‐5 ↗
34. 10.1016/0001‐6160(81)90111‐510.1016/0001‐6160(81)90111‐5 ↗
35. E04 Committee “Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials ” ASTM E384‐22 https://doi.org/10.1520/E0384‐22.10.1520/E0384 ↗
36. Kurz W. · 202310.4028/b-v7b35q ↗
37. 10.1007/s11661‐016‐3494‐710.1007/s11661‐016‐3494‐7 ↗
38. 10.1590/1980‐5373‐mr‐2019‐000910.1590/1980‐5373‐mr‐2019‐0009 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2012.05.01410.1016/j.jpcs.2012.05.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.03010.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.030 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.11093610.1016/j.matchar.2021.110936 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10973‐019‐08600‐210.1007/s10973‐019‐08600‐2 ↗
43. 10.3390/met1207107610.3390/met12071076 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.07.02310.1016/j.matchar.2014.07.023 ↗
45. Solidification of Binary and Ternary Eutectics
46. Neikov O. D. · 2009
47. 10.1039/C8DT02521E10.1039/C8DT02521E ↗
48. 10.1016/S0966‐9795(03)00157‐210.1016/S0966‐9795(03)00157‐2 ↗
49. 10.1039/C6TC04553G10.1039/C6TC04553G ↗
50. Jackson K. A. · 2005
51. 10.1007/BF0264620410.1007/BF02646204 ↗
52. 10.3390/ma1603106510.3390/ma16031065 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.173579610.1063/1.1735796 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11669‐015‐0436‐910.1007/s11669‐015‐0436‐9 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853‐009‐3995‐510.1007/s10853‐009‐3995‐5 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12159110.1016/j.actamat.2025.121591 ↗
57. Idiomorphic “Merriam‐Webster's collegiate dictionary ” n.d. September 2025 https://www.merriam‐webster.com/dictionary/idiomorphic.
58. 10.1016/0956‐7151(92)90298‐S10.1016/0956‐7151(92)90298‐S ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0131110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01311 ↗
60. 10.1361/10549710077033960810.1361/105497100770339608 ↗
61. 10.1007/s11664‐012‐2263‐710.1007/s11664‐012‐2263‐7 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.00310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.003 ↗
63. 10.1002/adem.20240107410.1002/adem.202401074 ↗
64. Jackson K. A. · 1966 · 363
65. Campbell J. · 2011
66. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10113410.1016/j.addma.2020.101134 ↗
67. Meyers M. A. · 2009