journal article·2026-06-12Open access

Field Report from Collaborative Research Center 1625: Heterogeneous Research Data Management Using Ontology Representations

Doaa Mohamed, Samuel García Vázquez, Behnam Mardani, Victor Dudarev, Alfred Ludwig, Maribel Acosta, Markus Stricker

Abstract

The goal of the Collaborative Research Center 1625 is the establishment of a scientific basis for the atomic‐scale understanding and design of multifunctional compositionally complex solid solution surfaces. Next to materials synthesis in the form of thin‐film material libraries, various material characterization and simulation techniques are used to explore the material data space of the problem. Machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques guide its exploration and navigation. The effective use of the combined heterogeneous data requires more than just a simple research data management plan. Consequently, our research data management system maps different data modalities in different formats and resolutions from different labs to the correct spatial locations on physical samples. Besides a graphical user interface, the system can also be accessed through an application programming interface for reproducible data‐driven workflows. It is implemented by a combination of a bespoke research data management system designed around a relational database, an ontology which builds upon materials science‐specific ontologies, and the construction of a Knowledge Graph. Along with the technical solutions of the research data management system and lessons learned , the first use cases are shown, which were not possible (or at least much harder to achieve) without it.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Interdisciplinary Centre for Advanced Materials Simulation Ruhr‐Universität Bochum Bochum Germany

Data Engineering Research Group Technical University of Munich Heilbronn Germany

Materials Discovery and Interfaces Ruhr‐Universität Bochum Bochum Germany

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20201437410.1002/anie.202014374 ↗
2. An Extensible Open‐Source Solution for Research Digitalisation in Materials Science10.1038/s41524-025-01618-1 ↗
3. S.Markus L.Banko N.Sarazin et al. "Computationally Accelerated Experimental Materials Characterization – Drawing Inspiration from High‐throughput Simulation Workflows " arXiv: 2212.04804 [cond‐mat.mtrl‐sci] (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04804.
4. 10.1039/D3DD00125C10.1039/D3DD00125C ↗
5. 10.1002/aidi.20250006210.1002/aidi.202500062 ↗
6. L.ZhangandM.Stricker Electrocatalyst discovery through text mining and multi‐objective optimization. arXiv:2502.20860. 2025. arXiv: 2502.20860 [cond‐mat.mtrl‐sci] (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20860.
7. L.ZhangandM.Stricker Iterative Corpus Refinement for Materials Property Prediction Based on Scientific Texts (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21646.10.1007/978-3-032-06118-8_6 ↗
8. Composition‐Property Extrapolation for Compositionally Complex Solid Solutions Based on Word Embeddings10.1039/D5DD00169B ↗
9. 10.1038/sdata.2016.1810.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41597‐022‐01710‐x10.1038/s41597‐022‐01710‐x ↗
11. Lysogorskiy Y. · 2025
12. 10.1002/anie.20230718710.1002/anie.202307187 ↗
13. 10.1039/D4DD00039K10.1039/D4DD00039K ↗
14. Accelerating the Adoption of Research Data Management Strategies10.1016/j.matt.2022.10.007 ↗
15. Lukas H. · Journal Research Data Policies in Materials Science · 2026
16. NFDI MatWerk consortium · NFDI‐MatWekr Progress Report. Tech. rep. DFG · 2024
17. Evolve with Your Research: Stepwise System Evolution from Document‐Driven to Fact‐Centric Research Data Management in Materials Science
18. 10.1016/S0169‐023X(97)00056‐610.1016/S0169‐023X(97)00056‐6 ↗
19. An Infrastructure for Spatial Linking of Survey Data
20. 10.1557/s43580‐024‐00874‐510.1557/s43580‐024‐00874‐5 ↗
21. 10.1002/adem.20240152710.1002/adem.202401527 ↗
22. 10.12688/f1000research.161252.110.12688/f1000research.161252.1 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20240214810.1002/adem.202402148 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11260310.1016/j.matdes.2023.112603 ↗
25. D.Anastasia M. V.Sande P.Colpaert R.Verborgh E.Mannens andR. V.de Walle RDF Mapping Language (RML) (2024) https://rml.io/specs/rml/.
26. 10.3233/SW‐22313510.3233/SW‐223135 ↗
27. RDF Working Group RDF standard model W3C recommendations https://www.w3.org/RDF/.
28. H.Lars M.Acosta M.Maleshkova andY.Sure‐Vetter “Querying Large Knowledge Graphs over Triple Pattern Fragments: An Empirical Study ” inInternational Semantic Web Conference(Springer 2018) 86–102.10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_6 ↗
29. L.HelingandM.Acosta “Federated SPARQL query processing over heterogeneous linked data fragments” ” inProceedings of the ACM Web Conference (2022) 1047–1057.10.1145/3485447.3511947 ↗
30. H.KnublauchandD.Kontokostas Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL). https://www.w3.org/TR/shac l/. W3C Recommendation 20 July 2017. Latest version available athttps://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/. 2017.
31. Efficient Validation of SHACL Shapes with Reasoning10.14778/3681954.3682023 ↗
32. European Materials Modelling Council The Elementary Multiperspective Material Ontology (EMMO) 2025 https://emmo ‐repo.github.io/ accessed: October 2025.
33. Evaluating FAIR Maturity through a Scalable, Automated, Community‐Governed Framework10.1038/s41597-019-0184-5 ↗
34. 10.5334/dsj‐2024‐03310.5334/dsj‐2024‐033 ↗
35. FAIR‐Checker: Supporting Digital Resource Findability and Reuse with Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web Standards10.1186/s13326-023-00289-5 ↗
36. An Automated Solution for Measuring the Progress toward FAIR Research Data10.1016/j.patter.2021.100370 ↗
37. FAIRsFAIR Project FAIRsFAIR FAIR Assessment Framework (2021) https://www.fairsfair.eu/fairsfa.
38. Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) ARDC FAIR Self Assessment Tool. Accessed: May 2021. 2020. Available at:https://ardc.edu.au/resources/working‐with‐data/fair‐data/fair‐self‐assessment‐tool/.
39. N.Bevan J.Carter andS.Harker “ISO. 9241‐11 Revised: What Have We Learnt about usability since 1998? ” inInternational Conference on Human‐Computer Interaction(Springer 2015) 143–151.10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_13 ↗
40. Nielsen J. · 1994
41. Ali D. · arXiv Preprint arXiv: 2402.11820 · 2024
42. Hart S. G. · 1988 · 139
43. 10.1037/0022‐0663.84.4.42910.1037/0022‐0663.84.4.429 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.05310.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.053 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0000410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 ↗
46. 10.1039/D5DD00231A10.1039/D5DD00231A ↗
47. 10.1016/j.softx.2024.10165410.1016/j.softx.2024.101654 ↗
48. D.MaltzandK.Ehrlich “Pointing the Way: Active Collaborative Filtering ” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’95 (Denver Colorado USA:ACM Press/Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co 1995) 202–209 https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223930.10.1145/223904.223930 ↗
49. A. I.Schein A.Popescul L.Ungar andD.Pennock “Methods and metrics for cold‐start recommendations” ” inProceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. SIGIR ’02(Tampere Finland:Association for Computing Machinery 2002) 253–260 https://doi.org/10.1145/564376.564421 isbn: 1581135610.10.1145/564376.564421 ↗
50. 10.1021/acscombsci.0c0005710.1021/acscombsci.0c00057 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12073510.1016/j.actamat.2025.120735 ↗
52. M.Adrian L.Yang A. K.Chandran et al. “MatBind: Probing the Multimodality of Materials Science with Contrastive Learning ” inAI for Accelerated Materials Design ‐ ICLR 2025(2025):https://openreview.net/forum?id=ZG0MBXi55v.