journal article·2026-07-22Open access

Nondestructive Testing of Welded Composite Metal Foams

Chinmaya Prerana Inguva, Aman Kaushik, Afsaneh Rabiei

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 14

Abstract

Steel–steel composite metal foams (S–S CMFs) are advanced cellular materials with hollow stainless‐steel spheres within a stainless‐steel matrix, noted for low density, high specific strength, and exceptional energy absorption. This study investigates X‐ray computed tomography (CT) as a nondestructive testing method to evaluate welded CMF joints produced via induction welding, diffusion bonding, and brazing using Cu and BNi‐2 fillers. CT scans are used to evaluate number of through‐thickness voids and spatial void distribution at the bonded interface. Δ Void metric is defined to quantify difference between postweld spatial void distribution and comparable preweld baseline to evaluate the influence of welding on mechanical performance and failure within samples. Substantial variation in Δ Void of welded CMFs indicates near‐joint failure, while minimal variation in Δ Void for welded CMFs informs away‐from‐joint failure. Δ Void between −2.43% and + 0.41% indicates away‐from‐joint failure, while those beyond this range report near‐joint failure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations also corroborate that matrix porosities and void percentage influence joint mechanical performance. Results demonstrate the importance of combining CT and SEM techniques to understand microstructural characteristics affecting S–S CMF weld performance. CT enables detection and analysis of internal defects without compromising structure, ensuring safety, and regulatory compliance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

Advanced Materials Manufacturing Raleigh North Carolina USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Transportation

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ACSOMEGA.3C0861310.1021/ACSOMEGA.3C08613 ↗
2. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2007.01.02610.1016/J.MATDES.2007.01.026 ↗
3. 10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2016.03.00510.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2016.03.005 ↗
4. 10.3390/JCS404017610.3390/JCS4040176 ↗
5. 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2015.07.00310.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2015.07.003 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20160077610.1002/adem.201600776 ↗
7. 10.1007/S00170‐023‐11709‐2/FIGURES/2110.1007/S00170‐023‐11709‐2/FIGURES/21 ↗
8. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.12.05510.1016/J.MATPR.2022.12.055 ↗
9. 10.1038/S41467‐019‐11521‐1;TECHMETA10.1038/S41467‐019‐11521‐1;TECHMETA ↗
10. 10.1016/J.JAJP.2025.10030210.1016/J.JAJP.2025.100302 ↗
11. 10.3390/S2216603610.3390/S22166036 ↗
12. 10.3390/MA1609357910.3390/MA16093579 ↗
13. 10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2009.01.00810.1016/J.COLSURFA.2009.01.008 ↗
14. 10.3390/MA1813314610.3390/MA18133146 ↗
15. 10.1177/168781402091376110.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
16. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.027573210.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0275732 ↗
17. 10.3390/MA1814331210.3390/MA18143312 ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20230143010.1002/adem.202301430 ↗
19. 10.1016/J.JAJP.2024.10027910.1016/J.JAJP.2024.100279 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.JMRT.2025.10.08110.1016/J.JMRT.2025.10.081 ↗
21. A.Rabiei Composite Metal Foam and Methods of Preparation Thereof. U.S. Patent US8110143B2.2012.
22. ASTM Standard E8/E8M‐22Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (ASTM International 2022)https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M‐22.10.1520/E0008_E0008M ↗
23. AWS B40 Standard Methods for Mechanical Testing of Welds (American Welding Society Inc. (AWS) 2016).