Setup‐Optimized Sequencing in Job Shops: Modeling Workstation Productivity and Lateness Behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Sequence‐dependent setups in job‐shop manufacturing create a trade‐off: raising productivity through setup‐optimized sequencing tends to reduce schedule reliability. This study presents a modeling approach that quantifies this trade‐off at the workstation level. Building on the production operating curve and the boundary case with many setup families, the approach links sequencing effects to mean work‐in‐process (WIP) and utilization. The model yields expressions for the performance‐based and the effective productivity gains, which are bounded by the relative setup share and can only be realized during active production time. It also provides an expression for the sequence‐induced standard deviation of relative lateness as a function of WIP and utilization. Sensitivity results show proportional dependence on the setup share and diminishing gains with increasing numbers of setup families, while a two‐point comparison demonstrates the trade‐off. The model provides consistent metrics for positioning workstations within the productivity–schedule‐reliability trade‐off and for supporting sequencing and WIP‐related operating decisions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Assembly Line Balancing Optimization · Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Production Systems and Logistics (IFA) Leibniz University Hannover Garbsen Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-642-56286-010.1007/978-3-642-56286-0 ↗
2. Wiendahl H.‐P. · 2010
3. 10.1007/978-3-662-48459-310.1007/978-3-662-48459-3 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-662-70758-610.1007/978-3-662-70758-6 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-3-540-75642-210.1007/978-3-540-75642-2 ↗
6. J.Mayer Quantitative Modellierung logistischer Auswirkungen von rüstoptimalen Auftragsreihenfolgen an Arbeitssystemen(PhD diss. Leibniz Universität Hannover 2018).
7. 10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/01200210.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012002 ↗
8. 10.1080/23080477.2022.204020510.1080/23080477.2022.2040205 ↗
9. C.Guo M.Li andD.Lei “Multi‐objective flexible job shop scheduling problem with key objectives ” in IEEE ed. 2019 34th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) 06.‐08.06(2019).10.1109/YAC.2019.8787585 ↗
10. 10.3926/jiem.871010.3926/jiem.8710 ↗
11. 10.1080/09537287.2020.182264210.1080/09537287.2020.1822642 ↗
12. F.Engehausen Modellierung Und Auslegung der Reihenfolgebildung Mit Rüstfamilien(PhD diss. Technische Universität Hamburg 2021).
13. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.00810.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.008 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-3-540-92839-310.1007/978-3-540-92839-3 ↗
15. S.Bertsch Modellbasierte Berechnung der Termintreue(PhD diss. Leibniz Universität Hannover 2015).