journal article·2026-07-22

Stress‐Induced Irreversible B19‐to‐B2 Transformation in a Ductile Ti–Ni–Cu–Nb Alloy With High Copper Content

Bingkun Wang, Shenghao Liu, Xiao‐Dong Wang, Qingping Cao, Dongxian Zhang, Jian‐Zhong Jiang

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

We find that 5 at.% Nb substitution for Ni in the Ti 50 Ni 30− x Cu 20 Nb x ( x = 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 at.%) alloy series is an effective measure to improve the brittleness after annealing at 1123 K for 24 h followed by water quenching. This annealed sample mainly consists of spheroidized β‐Nb phase, high content of B19, minor B2, and Ti 2 (Ni,Cu) phase, possessing the microhardness of ∼255 HV, fracture strength of ∼915 MPa, and total tensile strain of ∼16%. Under cold rolling or tension, the stress‐induced B19‐to‐B2 transformation easily happens, which is irreversible upon unloading but becomes reversible during 1123 K annealing. The possible reason is that martensite variants and/or dislocations produced by deformation could hinder the interface movement between B19 and B2 phases at room temperature, which however can be released at 1123 K.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

International Center for New‐Structured Materials (ICNSM) State Key Laboratory of Silicon and Advanced Semiconductor Materials and School of Materials Science and Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou People's Republic of China

School of Materials Science and Engineering Fuyao University of Science and Technology Fuzhou China

State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation Zhejiang University Hangzhou P. R. China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-000-0082-410.1007/s11837-000-0082-4 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.191510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.1915 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41586-021-04309-110.1038/s41586-021-04309-1 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.126116410.1126/science.1261164 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01714-210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01714-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.15310.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.153 ↗
7. 10.1002/adem.20190038710.1002/adem.201900387 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.04710.1016/j.matpr.2017.09.047 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00631-010.1016/S0167-577X(01)00631-0 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.020692310.1063/5.0206923 ↗
11. 10.1063/5.027390910.1063/5.0273909 ↗
12. Shape Memory Behavior of Ti‐Ni‐Cu Thin Films
13. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.00310.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.003 ↗
14. 10.2320/matertrans1989.31.95910.2320/matertrans1989.31.959 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14334610.1016/j.msea.2022.143346 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.02810.1016/j.msea.2015.01.028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.intermet.2016.01.00910.1016/j.intermet.2016.01.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.21910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.219 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-025-56580-910.1038/s41467-025-56580-9 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.09.032 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.00310.1016/j.jmapro.2019.11.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.09010.1016/j.msea.2012.09.090 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.14610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.146 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.01910.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.019 ↗
29. 10.1177/1045389X1663376810.1177/1045389X16633768 ↗
30. 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90138-Q10.1016/0921-5093(92)90138-Q ↗
31. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90371-910.1016/0956-7151(94)90371-9 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.02210.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.022 ↗