Production, Properties, and Applications of Surface‐Crusted Lightweight Metals in Wind Turbines
Source abstract
Abstract
After many years of wind energy use, the gradual decommissioning of numerous wind farms has highlighted issues related to current applied materials, theirapplication, and recycling. The paper focuses on existing technologies (Alporas, Alulight, and Metcomb) for producing aluminum cellular materials with regard to their use in the manufacturing of small wind turbine blades. Special attention is also given to comparing the advantages and disadvantages of materials from the perspective of production and subsequent recycling. The samples were produced using the Alulight method, and tensile stress was tested. Our study shows that Alulight and Metcomb are more suitable from a production perspective, but in terms of ecology, they increase the carbon footprint during recycling. As small wind turbines are expected to be deployed on a larger scale in the future, the appropriate selection and use of materials can help prevent problems similar to those currently encountered with large wind farms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bauxite Residue and Utilization · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Technology Technical University of Liberec Liberec Czech Republic
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz Zittau Germany
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Michna Š. · 2007
2. W. S.Carron D.Snowberg P.Murdy andS.Hughes “Using Large‐Scale Additive Manufacturing for Wind Turbine Blade Core Structures ” Technical Report NREL/TP‐5000‐85673 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2023).10.2172/1994799 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-981-97-2075-010.1007/978-981-97-2075-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.12.003 ↗
5. Reuter M. A. · 2005
6. 10.1002/adem.20120021710.1002/adem.201200217 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.04310.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.043 ↗
8. 10.3389/fmats.2022.99867310.3389/fmats.2022.998673 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijengsci2011.08.01010.1016/j.ijengsci2011.08.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.28710.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.287 ↗
11. G.Malliotakis P.Alevras andCh.Baniotopoulos “Sandwich Metal Foam Rings for Wind Turbine Backling Enhancment ” inCESARE´22 3rd Coordinating Engineering for Sustainability and Resilience(Jordan University of Science and Technology 2022).
12. Nova I. · 2025
13. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐09230‐z10.1007/s00170‐022‐09230‐z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.03610.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.036 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14411410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144114 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20060007110.1002/adem.200600071 ↗
18. D. C.Curran “Aluminium Foam: Production Using Calcium Carbonate a Foaming Agent” (PhD. diss. Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy University Cambridge 2004) https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.14286.
19. Ashby M. F. · 2000
20. 10.1039/C1SMO5831B10.1039/C1SMO5831B ↗
21. Produit Métallique Pour L’obtention D’objets Laminés, Moulés Ou Autres, Et Procédés Pour Sa Fabrication
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.01010.1016/j.jsv.2018.12.010 ↗
23. K.Oh E.Lee J. S.Bae et al. “Large Scale Production and Applications of Alloy Metal Foam ” inProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Porous Metals and Metallic Foams MetFoam GS Intervision 448 6 Sinsu Ding Mapo GU(2011).
24. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.11801610.1016/j.envres.2023.118016 ↗
25. R. P. L.Nijssen “Fatigue Life Prediction and Strength Degradation of Wind Turbine Rotor Blade Composites” (PhD. Thesis Knowledge Centre Wind Turbine Materials and Constructions (KC‐WMC)(2007) 257.
26. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.00810.1016/j.rser.2013.11.008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11049310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110493 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.28110.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.281 ↗
29. 10.1179/02670830222500590910.1179/026708302225005909 ↗
30. Píšek J. · 2010
31. Recycling Light Metals: Optimal Thermal De‐Coating, Recycling and Clean Technologies
32. 10.3390/en1010159410.3390/en10101594 ↗
33. Low Strain Rate Mechanical Performance of Balsa Wood and Carbon Fibre‐Epoxy‐Balsa Sandwich Structures
34. 10.17863/CAM.925710.17863/CAM.9257 ↗
35. W. S.Corron D.Snowberg P.Murdy andS.Hughes “Using Large‐Scala Additive Manufacturing for Wind Turbine Blade Cove Structures ” Technical Report NREL/TP‐ 5000‐85673 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2023).10.2172/1994799 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.05.00610.1016/j.jestch.2018.05.006 ↗
37. 10.1002/ese3.7003010.1002/ese3.70030 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2023.10041410.1016/j.jcomc.2023.100414 ↗
39. T. S.Srivatsan M.Ashram Imam andR.Srinivasan “Fatique of Materials III Advances and Emergences ” inUnderstanding Proceeding of the Third Biennial Symposium(John Wiley Sons 2014).10.1002/9781119041498 ↗
40. 10.1023/A:100438322222810.1023/A:1004383222228 ↗
41. 10.3390/app1418852710.3390/app14188527 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1603122610.3390/ma16031226 ↗
43. Körner C. · 2008
44. 10.1039/C4MH00244J10.1039/C4MH00244J ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.00410.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.004 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma902008510.3390/ma9020085 ↗
47. 10.1533/978085709728610.1533/9780857097286 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-7 ↗
49. 10.21203/rs.3.rs‐2131435/v110.21203/rs.3.rs‐2131435/v1 ↗
50. CSN EN ISO 9513: Metallic materials—Calibration of extensometer systems used in uniaxial testing (2013).
51. Hertzberg R. W. · 1996
52. J. A.Navarro Martínez “Material Choice and Blade Design” (Master Thesis Denmark Technical University of Denmark 2019).
53. J.Kočíb “Mechanical Properties of Fibre‐Recycled Properties Composites” (Thesis Technical University of Liberec 2020).
54. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.66‐68.119910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.66‐68.1199 ↗
55. Linul E. · 2013 · 171
56. 10.3390/ma1207108710.3390/ma12071087 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.06.00810.1016/j.marstruc.2018.06.008 ↗
58. “Technical Document of the Company INPART24 HNBR ” accessed September 5 2024 https://inpart24.com/en.
59. “Technical Documents of the Company GTEEK EPDM ” accessed December 1 2024 www.grteek.com.
60. “Technical Document of the Company SSP Manufacturing MVQ ” accessed January 8 2025 www.sspseals.com.
61. “Technical Document of the Company SITTECHCZ NBR ” accessed Novemeber 30 2024 www.sittech.cz/en/produkt/nbr/.
62. “Technical Document of the Company KOFLER Dichtungen FPM ” accessed January 7 2025 https://koflerdichtungen.at/en(accessed 2025‐01‐07).
63. “Technical Document of the Company MPC Mearthane Products Corporation PE ” accessed January 4 2025 https://knowledgecenter.mearthane.com.
64. 10.24352/UB.OVGU‐2024‐06310.24352/UB.OVGU‐2024‐063 ↗
65. 10.1002/adem.20240276910.1002/adem.202402769 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.58610.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.586 ↗
67. Mark H. F. · 2013
68. 10.1007/978-3-7091-0514-610.1007/978-3-7091-0514-6 ↗
69. Hepburn C. · 2012
70. 10.1016/j.prog.polymsci2018.12.00310.1016/j.prog.polymsci2018.12.003 ↗