journal article·2026-05-20Open access

Toward Low‐Consumable Anodes: Process Simulation and Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of NiFe 2 O 4 ‐NiO‐Ni‐Cu vs. Prebaked Anodes for Aluminum Production with use of Molten Salt Electrolysis

Felipe Alejandro Garcia Paz, Ulziikhuu Otgonbayar, Alexander Adamczyk, Farhan Hossain, Daniel Vogt, Johan Berg Pettersen, Alexandros Charitos

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 10

Abstract

Aluminum production via the Hall–Héroult process is characterized by high energy consumption and significant greenhouse gas emissions, primarily due to the use of consumable carbon anodes. This study investigates the thermodynamic behavior, energy demands, and environmental implications of transitioning to low‐consumable (LC) NiFe 2 O 4 –NiO–Ni–Cu‐based anodes as a strategy for decarbonizing primary aluminum production. To assess sensitivity to upstream energy supply, the study compares the evolution of German and Norwegian electricity systems from 2025 to 2050, starting from Germany's currently more carbon‐intensive mix and Norway's predominantly renewable system. Although LC anode production is more energy‐intensive (2.1 vs. 0.99 kWh/kg), their long service life reduces specific energy use to 0.00021 kWh/kg Al versus 0.44 kWh/kg Al. However, increased bath voltage raises the net electricity demand by ≈2.8 kWh/kg Al. Life cycle assessment (LCA), using foreground thermodynamic simulation data and background data from ecoinvent v3.10, was performed to quantify global warming potential (GWP), acidification (AP), and material resources: metals/minerals (MRD). Results indicate that, in a German scenario, the use of LC anodes reduces environmental impacts by up to 8% in GWP, 20% in AP, although they increase MRD by ≈10% compared to prebaked anodes. Decarbonizing the electricity supply, modeled using Norway's energy mix, yields GWP reductions exceeding 50%. Furthermore, a prospective LCA was conducted with Premise and Brightway, integrating future energy pathways from the Regional Model of Investments and Development integrated assessment model under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2—Base and the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) scenarios for 2025–2050. In Germany, LC anodes under NDC policies reduce GWP by up to 76% and AP by 56% by 2050 compared to 2025, although MRD increases by a factor of 2.06. In Norway, the reductions are smaller but still meaningful, with GWP and AP decreasing by ≈50%, while MRD declines by 33% by 2050 relative to 2025. This integrated analysis highlights LC anodes potential for aluminum decarbonization while revealing trade‐offs between emissions and resource demand. Future research should address cell design, electrolyte optimization, and circular strategies to limit energy and material pressures. LC anodes, especially with clean electricity, can be a cornerstone of sustainable aluminum production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Extraction and Separation Processes · Bauxite Residue and Utilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Nonferrous Metallurgy and Purest Materials (INEMET) TU Bergakademie Freiberg Freiberg Germany

Industrial Ecology Programme Department of Energy and Process Engineering NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. European Commission “Directorate‐General for Internal Market Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs Critical Raw Materials ” accessed April 2025 https://single‐market‐economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw‐materials/areas‐specific‐interest/critical‐raw‐materials_en.
2. European Aluminium “Aluminium Industry European Aluminium Association ” accessed April 2025 https://european‐aluminium.eu/about‐aluminium/aluminium‐industry/.
3. European Environment Agency Environmental Statement 2023 EEA Report No. 10/2024 Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg2024 accessed April 2025 https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/environmental‐statement‐2023.
4. Zore L. · 2024
5. Eritja M. C. · 2024
6. Haupin W. · 2000
7. Galasiu I. · 2007
8. 10.1007/978-3-319-48156-2_2210.1007/978-3-319-48156-2_22 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11663‐016‐0735‐510.1007/s11663‐016‐0735‐5 ↗
10. 10.1016/B978-0-323-85514-3.00010-510.1016/B978-0-323-85514-3.00010-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11231110.1016/j.rser.2022.112311 ↗
12. 10.1002/srin.20240043510.1002/srin.202400435 ↗
13. C. W.Bale FactSage Thermochemical Software and Databases.
14. Metso Metso HSC Chemistry 2025 accessed August 2025 https://www.metso.com/portfolio/hsc‐chemistry/.
15. 10.1007/s11367‐016‐1087‐810.1007/s11367‐016‐1087‐8 ↗
16. 10.21105/joss.0023610.21105/joss.00236 ↗
17. European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (EPLCA) European Platform on LCA accessed August 2025 2025 https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/developerEF.html.
18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) · 2006
19. 10.5006/MP2004_43_5-2810.5006/MP2004_43_5-28 ↗
20. 10.1002/9781118448847.ch1k10.1002/9781118448847.ch1k ↗
21. U.S. Department of Energy · 2007
22. 10.1007/s40828‐022‐00162‐510.1007/s40828‐022‐00162‐5 ↗
23. 10.1002/978352767404610.1002/9783527674046 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10977310.1016/j.corsci.2021.109773 ↗
25. 10.1023/A:100346022041810.1023/A:1003460220418 ↗
26. Moran M. J. · 2010
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.14045810.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140458 ↗
28. 10.1002/978352780947910.1002/9783527809479 ↗
29. Fischer W. K. · 1995
30. Wu X. · 2021
31. 10.1007/s11665‐014‐0914‐y10.1007/s11665‐014‐0914‐y ↗
32. Effect of NiO Content on Corrosion Behaviour of Ni–xNiO–NiFe2O4 Cermets in Na3AlF6–Al2O3 Melts
33. Tarcy G. P. · 2016 · 1082
34. 10.2172/682730710.2172/6827307 ↗
35. Weyand J. D. · 1986
36. 10.1088/1757‐899X/866/1/01200810.1088/1757‐899X/866/1/012008 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.04310.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.043 ↗
38. McHenry E. R. · 1998
39. 10.1007/BF0325753910.1007/BF03257539 ↗
40. 10.1007/978-3-319-48200-2_6110.1007/978-3-319-48200-2_61 ↗
41. S.Fazio V.Castellani S.Sala et al. Supporting Information to the Characterisation Factors of Recommended EF Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods: New Methods and Differences with ILCD (Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 2018).S.
42. 10.5194/gmd‐14‐6571‐202110.5194/gmd‐14‐6571‐2021 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.00910.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.00410.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004 ↗
45. DNV Veritas Energy Transition Norway: A National Forecast to 2050 accessed September 2025 https://www.dnv.com/about/statistics‐and‐insights/energy‐transition/.
46. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.11444210.1016/j.rser.2024.114442 ↗
47. 10.3390/met1312194610.3390/met13121946 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41598‐024‐52583‐610.1038/s41598‐024‐52583‐6 ↗
49. U.S. Department of Energy Waste Heat Reduction and Recovery for Improving Furnace Efficiency Productivity and Emissions Performance: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (U.S. Department of Energy 2004).
50. 10.1007/s11837‐001‐0205‐610.1007/s11837‐001‐0205‐6 ↗