A Physical‐Based Constitutive Modeling Coupled With Dynamic Spheroidization and Phase Transformation for Bimodal Ti–6Al–4V Alloy Within α+β Region
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermomechanical response and microstructure evolution of a bimodal Ti–6Al–4V alloy are investigated by isothermal compression tests within α+β phase region. Intensified flow softening, primarily driven by adiabatic heating and microstructure evolution, is observed at lower temperatures or higher strain rates. Microstructural analysis demonstrates that elevated temperature, strain, and strain rate collectively accelerate the α→β phase transformation, while large deformation coupled with higher temperatures or lower strain rates facilitates the spheroidization of lamellar α phase (α L ). A physical‐based constitutive model is developed, incorporating four key mechanisms: (1) dislocation changes in each phase through work hardening, dynamic recovery, spheroidization of α L phase, and dynamic recrystallization; (2) the reduction of Hall–Petch strengthening; (3) adiabatic heating effects; and (4) variations in β phase content. This model can successfully predict flow stress for bimodal Ti–6Al–4V within α+β phase region, confirming its effectiveness in optimizing deformation and forming parameters for this alloy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Central South University Changsha P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing for Extreme Service Performance Changsha P. R. China
Funding
Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17477110.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174771 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-023-38250-210.1038/s41598-023-38250-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.11010.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.110 ↗
4. 10.3390/met1409098510.3390/met14090985 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.07910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.079 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20200044710.1002/adem.202000447 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13885110.1016/j.msea.2019.138851 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.07.03610.1016/j.cja.2020.07.036 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.05210.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.052 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.04410.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.044 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.12710.1016/j.msea.2017.11.127 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.07710.1016/j.jmapro.2023.03.077 ↗
14. Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of a TiB‐Reinforced Ti‐6.5Al‐2Zr‐1Mo‐1V Matrix Composite
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.28510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.285 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.11510.1016/j.promfg.2020.08.115 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.00910.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.04410.1016/j.msea.2017.11.044 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.02410.1016/j.msea.2003.09.024 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.12010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.120 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00063-110.1016/S0167-6636(01)00063-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.005 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11661-002-0394-910.1007/s11661-002-0394-9 ↗
24. 10.1002/adem.20190119310.1002/adem.201901193 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11665-024-09228-610.1007/s11665-024-09228-6 ↗
26. 10.3390/machines1007055310.3390/machines10070553 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14357110.1016/j.msea.2022.143571 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cja.2023.02.00710.1016/j.cja.2023.02.007 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13928210.1016/j.msea.2020.139282 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11661-003-0103-310.1007/s11661-003-0103-3 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.03.11310.1016/j.jallcom.2012.03.113 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01531-310.1016/S0921-5093(01)01531-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.00410.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.004 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11665-014-1243-x10.1007/s11665-014-1243-x ↗
35. 10.1515/htmp-2014-015710.1515/htmp-2014-0157 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.08910.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.089 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10489-025-06523-010.1007/s10489-025-06523-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.00910.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.009 ↗
39. 10.1088/2053-1591/abdaf010.1088/2053-1591/abdaf0 ↗
40. A Unified Microstructure‐Based Constitutive Model for a Ni‐Based Superalloy and Its Application in the Forging Processes of Disk
41. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.21510.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.215 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.003 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00339-023-06934-110.1007/s00339-023-06934-1 ↗
44. 10.1361/10599490177034459310.1361/105994901770344593 ↗
45. 10.3390/ma1422675010.3390/ma14226750 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.11010.1016/j.msea.2012.08.110 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.msea.2023.14588710.1016/j.msea.2023.145887 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.10510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.105 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00378-010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00378-0 ↗