Hierarchical Gradient Identification of Internal Quasi‐Disorder Structure Characteristics for Metallic Wire Mesh Elastomer Based on Fractal Dimension
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the ambiguous definition of porosity gradient in metallic wire mesh elastomer (MWME), this work proposes a hierarchical gradient approach for identifying the quasi‐disorder characteristics of the pore structure in MWME based on fractal dimension. At first, the effects of the image parameters, including the image size, resolution, and threshold, on the fractal dimension can be analyzed, respectively. Then, the woven–metallic wire mesh (WMWM) and entangled–metallic wire mesh (EMWM) are divided into several layers to reveal the evolutionary characteristics of porosity gradient in axial and radial directions. The results indicate that the fractal dimension of pore structure in MWME is sensitive to the image parameters, especially to the threshold, and positively correlated with the cross‐sectional porosity of layers and negatively correlated with the relative density. What's more, the maximum deviation between relative density and designed density in EMWM is 0.08 g/cm 3 , which confirms the feasibility of the segmented two‐step stamping process. Finally, increasing the number of layers contributes to a smoother transition in porosity gradient.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Metal Rubber & Vibration Noise School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation Fuzhou University Fuzhou China
Nuclear Power Institute of China Chengdu China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.dt.2023.12.00810.1016/j.dt.2023.12.008 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11037510.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110375 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.021 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10681610.1016/j.tws.2020.106816 ↗
5. 10.1007/s42235-021-0039-610.1007/s42235-021-0039-6 ↗
6. 10.3390/sym1510193810.3390/sym15101938 ↗
7. 10.1177/0885328222114669210.1177/08853282221146692 ↗
8. 10.1007/s42417-019-00109-010.1007/s42417-019-00109-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11288610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112886 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10854-025-14233-z10.1007/s10854-025-14233-z ↗
11. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0307310.1021/acsanm.1c03073 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11930210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119302 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41578-020-0212-210.1038/s41578-020-0212-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11246210.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112462 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2026.11124110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2026.111241 ↗
16. 10.1080/15376494.2021.201285510.1080/15376494.2021.2012855 ↗
17. 10.1186/s10033-024-01165-810.1186/s10033-024-01165-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dt.2025.05.01310.1016/j.dt.2025.05.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11142710.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111427 ↗
20. A Constitutive Model of Metal Rubber for Hysteresis Characteristics Based on a Meso‐Mechanical Method
21. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10344710.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103447 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1418520010.3390/ma14185200 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cja.2023.06.03810.1016/j.cja.2023.06.038 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11010610.1016/j.tws.2022.110106 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13296410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132964 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10875210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108752 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14179510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141795 ↗