journal article·2026-06-03Open access

Numerical Modeling of Tank Cars Carrying Hazardous Materials With and Without Composite Metal Foam

Aman Kaushik, Afsaneh Rabiei

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 11

Abstract

Large‐scale numerical puncture models are solved for indenter impact on carbon–steel with and without steel–steel composite metal foam (S–S CMF), positioned between indenter and carbon–steel. Metallic matrix of S–S CMF occupies interstitial spaces between hollow steel spheres filled with air, which enhance impact energy absorption and thermal insulation. Numerical models evaluate puncture prevention performance of S–S CMF under large‐scale puncture test simulating impact on pressurized tank car carrying hazardous materials (HAZMATs). S–S CMF is modeled using simplified homogeneous and complex nonhomogeneous fluid cavity approach. Included S–S CMF prevents puncture in carbon–steel plate for parametric analyses involving simulated tank car pressure and S–S CMF thickness. The addition of S–S CMF to carbon–steel plate limits stress triaxiality transformation from dominant tensile to mixed‐mode stress state during impact. CMF prevents puncture by absorbing impact energy and ensuring moderate triaxiality in carbon–steel plate such that void growth and coalescence counteract shear banding. The study reports that 10.91–13.33 mm thick S–S CMF prevents puncture at an indenter velocity of 5.81 m s −1 and an internal tank car pressure of 689.5 kPa, which otherwise would puncture without the inclusion of CMF. The study indicates the importance of adding CMF layer to tank car structures to improve safety for HAZMAT transportation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Materials Research Lab Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

Funding

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20200069310.1002/adem.202000693 ↗
2. Trevithick S. · Side Impact Test and Analyses of a DOT‐105 Tank Car
3. Trevithick S.
4. P.Rakoczy M.Carolan T.Gorhum andS.Eshraghi “Side Impact Test and Analyses of a DOT‐117 Tank Car ” accessed September 10 2025 (Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration 2019)https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40276.
5. Maty A. D. · 2022
6. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.10633610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106336 ↗
7. 10.1002/fam.291210.1002/fam.2912 ↗
8. M. E.Carolan D. Y.Jeong B.Perlman et al. 2013 “Application of Welded Steel Sandwich Panels for Tank Car Shell Impact Protection ” accessed September 10 2025 https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/fra_net/3125/TR_Application%20of%20Welded%20Steel%20Panels_20130423_final.pdf.
9. National Transportation Safety Board 2005 “Collision of Norfolk Southern Freight Train 192 With Standing Norfolk Southern Local Train P22 With Subsequent Hazardous Materials Release at Graniteville ”Railroad Accident Report National Transportation Safety Board accessed January 6 September 2025 https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RAR0504.pdf.
10. T. H.Brown “2024 “Examining the State of Rail Safety in the Aftermath of the Derailment in East Palestine ”Department of Transportation accessed Jully 18 2025 https://www.transportation.gov/Examining‐State‐Rail‐Safety‐Aftermath‐Derailment‐East‐Palestine‐Ohio‐0.
11. National Transportation Safety Board Norfolk Southern Railway Train Derailment with Subsequent Hazardous Material Release and Fires (2023) https://doi.org/10.21949/1504519.
12. National Transportation Safety Board 2014 “Safety Recommendation “ accessed September 10 2025 https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/Safety‐Recs/recletters/R‐14‐004‐006.pdf.
13. U.S. Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Fleet Composition of Rail Tank Cars Carrying Flammable Liquids: 2021 Report(Washington DC 2021).https://doi.org/10.21949/1523084.
14. National Transportation Safety Board 2022 “BNSF Railway Company Derailment and Pool Fire Involving DOT‐117J Tank Cars ” accessed September 10 2025 https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HZIR2301.pdf.
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10879510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108795 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.02810.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.028 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20160077610.1002/adem.201600776 ↗
18. 10.1177/109963622094288010.1177/1099636220942880 ↗
19. 10.1002/adem.20240126710.1002/adem.202401267 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20230143010.1002/adem.202301430 ↗
21. A.Rabiei 2010 Composite Metal Foam and Methods of PreparationThereof. U.S. Patent US7641984B2.
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.02710.1016/j.msea.2015.02.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.031 ↗
24. 10.1002/adem.20230021710.1002/adem.202300217 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20250160510.1002/adem.202501605 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.02610.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.026 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.014 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
29. Tensile and Shear Element Erosion in Metal Foams
30. B. P.Neville "Processing and Development of an Ultra‐Light High Strength Material through Powder Metallurgy" (PhD diss. North Carolina State University 2007).
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.07510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.075 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.10810.1016/j.msea.2012.11.108 ↗
33. 10.1155/2022/923510610.1155/2022/9235106 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0022‐5096(99)00082‐410.1016/S0022‐5096(99)00082‐4 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2806310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28063 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.028 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.08.00110.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.08.001 ↗
38. Systèmes D. · 2024
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10188510.1016/j.addma.2021.101885 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.02.00310.1016/j.simpat.2015.02.003 ↗
41. 10.1088/1757‐899x/1076/1/01207210.1088/1757‐899x/1076/1/012072 ↗
42. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.612.10510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.612.105 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.00210.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.002 ↗
44. Simulating Nonlinear Deformations of Solar Sail Membranes Using Explicit Time Integration
45. Three point bending analysis of a mobile phone using LS‐DYNA explicit integration method
46. Cohen M. · 1983 · 301
47. 10.1061/JMCEA3.000114410.1061/JMCEA3.0001144 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.04810.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.048 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.10.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.10.003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.07.01310.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.07.013 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.02710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.027 ↗
52. Chakrabarty J. · 2012
53. Sullivan L. · 2022
54. 10.3390/met502082210.3390/met5020822 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853-025-11516-y10.1007/s10853-025-11516-y ↗
56. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10448210.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104482 ↗
57. 10.3390/met910106710.3390/met9101067 ↗
58. 10.3390/met1108119310.3390/met11081193 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.tws.2004.03.01110.1016/j.tws.2004.03.011 ↗