Process‐Informed Analysis of As‐Built Metal Additive Surface Features
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies show potential for the development of functionally integrated lightweight designs, biomimetic structures and material savings. Typically, as‐built surfaces show powder particle agglomerations and re‐entrant features, leading to rough surfaces, which are associated with poor fatigue performance. To benefit from the full range of advantages with special focus on aerospace applications, critical features for crack initiation when subjected to fatigue loading need to be identified and mitigated. A first step towards achieving this goal is the surface texture characterisation based on the quantification of surface features. In this paper, selected areal height, functional and feature parameters from ISO 25178‐2:2022 are generated and process‐specific features are examined for as‐built AlSi7Mg0.6 from laser‐based powder bed fusion. A connection with the particle size distribution of the used powder is demonstrated. This direct incorporation of manufacturing variables into the characterisation of surface texture in metal AM is a novel approach in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Advanced Materials IFAM Bremen Germany
Manufacturing Metrology Team University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
Office of Adam Thompson MP House of Commons London UK
Faculty of Production Engineering University of Bremen Bremen Germany
Funding
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/095441001456879710.1177/0954410014568797 ↗
2. Eric Wycisk, and Claus Emmelmann
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10057810.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100578 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.03410.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.034 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11661-022-06940-710.1007/s11661-022-06940-7 ↗
6. T.Buchenau “Tailored Surface Texture Characterisation of Metal Additive Components for Aerospace Applications ”PhD thesis (University of Bremen 2024).
7. 10.3390/met910106310.3390/met9101063 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10549710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105497 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-022-10423-910.1007/s00170-022-10423-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.01.002 ↗
11. ISO 25178 Geometric Product Specifications (GPS) ‐ Surface Texture: Areal ‐ Part 2: Terms Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (2022).
12. 10.1007/s00170-019-03716-z10.1007/s00170-019-03716-z ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.02510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.10592010.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105920 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1613481510.3390/ma16134815 ↗
16. 10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/01400110.1088/2051-672X/3/1/014001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.08210.1016/j.procir.2020.02.082 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.07510.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.075 ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa7ce210.1088/1361-6501/aa7ce2 ↗
20. 10.3390/metrology302001110.3390/metrology3020011 ↗
21. Post‐Processing of Surface Topography Data for as‐Built Metal Additive Surface Texture Characterization
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.01310.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10127310.1016/j.addma.2020.101273 ↗
24. 10.1117/1.OE.56.11.11171410.1117/1.OE.56.11.111714 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.00110.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
26. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 2: Terms Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (2021).
27. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2017.06.00110.1016/j.cirpj.2017.06.001 ↗
28. Steinhilper W. · 2008
29. T.BuchenauandM.Amkreutz “Advanced surface texture analysis of metal additive components for innovative part qualification concepts in the aerospace industry ” in18th ECSSMET Conference at ESA ESTEC (2024).
30. 10.1007/978-3-642-36458-710.1007/978-3-642-36458-7 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00170-022-10024-610.1007/s00170-022-10024-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cirp.2021.05.00110.1016/j.cirp.2021.05.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.09.00710.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.09.007 ↗
34. 10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/01300210.1088/2051-672X/3/1/013002 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mssp.2006.01.08510.1016/j.mssp.2006.01.085 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.01810.1016/j.wear.2011.05.018 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.02.00210.1016/j.wear.2012.02.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.00510.1016/j.measurement.2015.09.005 ↗
39. 10.1088/2051-672X/ab520a10.1088/2051-672X/ab520a ↗
40. L.Newton N.Senin B.Smith andK.Richard Leach “Feature‐Based Characterisation of Evolving Surface Topographies in Finishing Operations for Additive Manufacturing ” inJoint Special Interest Group Meeting Between euspen and ASPE: Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing(American Society for Precision Engineering (ASPE) 2018).
41. 10.1088/1361-6501/aa9e1910.1088/1361-6501/aa9e19 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1510360410.3390/ma15103604 ↗
43. A.Thompson STammas‐Williams N.Senin I.Todd andK.Richard Leach “Correlating volume and Surface Features in Additively Manufactured Metal Parts ” inJoint Special Interest Group Meeting Between EUSPEN and ASPE: Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing(American Society for Precision Engineering (ASPE) 2018).
44. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.02.00510.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.02.005 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.00310.1016/j.procir.2018.05.003 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.34710.1016/j.procir.2016.02.347 ↗
47. 10.3390/ma1608316910.3390/ma16083169 ↗
48. M.Amkreutz C.Aumund‐Kopp H.Bruening et al. (2021) APOLLO ‐ Additive Teilefertigung ‐prüfung und Oberflächenbehandlung für Aluminiumkomponenten; Teilvorhaben PROMOTIVE ‐ Prozessoptimierung Materialcharakterisierung und Oberflächenschutz Additiv gefertigter Aluminiumbauteile : Schlussbericht : Laufzeit des Vorhabens: 01.01.2018 bis 30.06.2021 : Berichtszeitraum: 01.01.2018 bis 30.06.2021 2021.
49. Surface Texture and High Cycle Fatigue of As‐Built Metal Additive AlSi7Mg0.6
50. Buchenau T. · 2022
51. 10.5545/sv-jme.2010.17510.5545/sv-jme.2010.175 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.10078610.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100786 ↗