Development and Mechanical Evaluation of a Novel Segmental Braided–Knitted Nitinol Stent with Enhanced Migration Resistance for Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction
Source abstract
Abstract
Colorectal cancer causes high mortality, with malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO) affecting up to 20% of patients. Self‐expanding metal stents (SEMSs), especially nitinol‐based (nickel‐Titanium alloy), are standard for MLBO but struggle to balance radial strength, flexibility, and migration resistance. This study presents a segmental nitinol stent (S‐stent) that uses braided and knitted structures, with braided segments for radial support and flanged anchorage linked by flexible knitted loops. Finite element analysis (FEA) optimized the stent's design. In vitro mechanical testing compared the S‐stent to a commercial braided stent, showing the S‐stent had higher flange radial force (6.02 ± 0.49 N vs. 2.54 ± 0.14 N), better compression recovery, superior bending flexibility, and 22% more pullout resistance, with reduced foreshortening and improved anatomical fit. FEA matched experimental results, showing the S‐stent localizes stress, reduces migration, and maintains lumen patency or normal flow. This advancement offers improved migration resistance and mechanical performance without sacrificing flexibility or safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions · Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments · Hernia repair and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Textile Science and Technology of the Ministry of Education College of Textiles Donghua University Shanghai China
Department of Textile Engineering Ethiopian Institute of Textile and Fashion Technology Bahir Dar University Bahir Dar Ethiopia
Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Advanced Textiles Donghua University Shanghai China
Department of Textile Engineering Mehran University of Engineering and Technology Jamshoro Pakistan
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/cancers1604082110.3390/cancers16040821 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11605-018-3990-810.1007/s11605-018-3990-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.05210.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.052 ↗
4. Small‐Bowel Capsule Endoscopy and Device‐Assisted Enteroscopy for Diagnosis and Treatment of Small‐Bowel Disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline ‐ Update 2022
5. 10.1177/0954411922112317610.1177/09544119221123176 ↗
6. 10.1055/a-2304-321910.1055/a-2304-3219 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00384-024-04724-610.1007/s00384-024-04724-6 ↗
8. 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.19310.4253/wjge.v11.i3.193 ↗
9. 10.4253/wjge.v15.i4.19510.4253/wjge.v15.i4.195 ↗
10. 10.1080/17434440.2019.169722910.1080/17434440.2019.1697229 ↗
11. 10.1186/s13017-023-00515-610.1186/s13017-023-00515-6 ↗
12. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.132751710.3389/fbioe.2023.1327517 ↗
13. 10.3892/mco.2021.233210.3892/mco.2021.2332 ↗
14. 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp2021412410.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20214124 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00384-021-03834-910.1007/s00384-021-03834-9 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00464-021-08789-010.1007/s00464-021-08789-0 ↗
17. 10.1097/MD.000000000003607810.1097/MD.0000000000036078 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-030-12823-4_3310.1007/978-3-030-12823-4_33 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-3-031-22599-4_7710.1007/978-3-031-22599-4_77 ↗
20. 10.1002/adhm.20220027110.1002/adhm.202200271 ↗
21. 10.3390/bioengineering1110098310.3390/bioengineering11100983 ↗
22. 10.18528/ijgii20000510.18528/ijgii200005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10346710.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103467 ↗
24. 10.1055/a-1140-301710.1055/a-1140-3017 ↗
25. 10.18528/ijgii20000510.18528/ijgii200005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.05110.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.051 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-021-06700-910.1007/s10853-021-06700-9 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01299.x10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01299.x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.03110.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.031 ↗
30. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa20810.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa208 ↗
31. 10.5946/ce.2014.47.5.41510.5946/ce.2014.47.5.415 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00464-018-6399-210.1007/s00464-018-6399-2 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00384-018-3137-010.1007/s00384-018-3137-0 ↗
34. 10.1111/den.1490510.1111/den.14905 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.04010.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.040 ↗
36. Success Rates of Fixation Techniques on Prevention of Esophageal Stent Migration: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
37. 10.4166/kjg.2022.07710.4166/kjg.2022.077 ↗
38. 10.21037/jtd.2019.04.0210.21037/jtd.2019.04.02 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.04510.1016/j.gie.2024.01.045 ↗
40. 10.1155/2016/869085810.1155/2016/8690858 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.10197710.1016/j.gassur.2025.101977 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.10984110.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109841 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.006 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-021-02573-910.1038/s41598-021-02573-9 ↗
45. 10.1186/s12938-016-0135-810.1186/s12938-016-0135-8 ↗
46. 10.1177/159101991666309310.1177/1591019916663093 ↗
47. 10.1002/cnm.7007810.1002/cnm.70078 ↗
48. 10.1007/s13239-024-00717-210.1007/s13239-024-00717-2 ↗
49. 10.1371/journal.pone.028349210.1371/journal.pone.0283492 ↗
50. 10.3389/fmedt.2024.138820710.3389/fmedt.2024.1388207 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.05410.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.054 ↗
52. Biomechanical Performance of Auxetic‐Structured PLA Coronary Stents: A Comparative Finite Element Analysis with Absorb and Fantom Stents