A Knowledge‐Based Approach for Understanding and Managing Additive Manufacturing Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is an innovative production approach that has gained significant attention due to its ability to overcome many limitations associated with traditional manufacturing techniques. As a consequence of efforts to optimize various AM processes, especially across different methods, a vast amount of data is either utilized (e.g., material properties, printer specifications, and process settings) or generated (e.g., monitoring data during printing, slicing strategies, and parameter configurations). Effectively managing, understanding, and retrieving information from this data remains a major challenge. The data often exhibits complex interrelationships and is distributed across heterogeneous sources, making it difficult for researchers and industry professionals to extract meaningful insights or make informed decisions. To address these challenges, we propose a knowledge‐based approach designed to support the structured management of AM data. The core of this approach is a modular ontology ( PBF‐AMP‐Onto ), which serves as a semantic foundation for integrating diverse data sources, enabling semantic querying, and supporting decision‐making systems. This ontology facilitates semantics‐aware data management, enhances the interpretability of AM processes, and contributes to the optimization of manufacturing outcomes. In this paper, we focus on one of the most advanced AM techniques, powder bed fusion (PBF), with a particular emphasis on electron beam (EB‐PBF). To validate the feasibility and practical utility of our approach, we constructed a knowledge graph using a workbench ( PBF‐AMP‐KG Workbench ) and based on our ontology using data from real‐world EB‐PBF use cases. We then demonstrate how domain‐relevant queries, such as those concerning process parameters, material behavior, and machine settings, can be answered efficiently using this knowledge graph, showcasing its potential to support researchers in navigating and leveraging AM data more effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University Linköping Sweden
Swedish e‐Science Research Centre Linköping University Linköping Sweden
Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.15010.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.41510.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.415 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cad.2019.02.00410.1016/j.cad.2019.02.004 ↗
5. 10.1520/SSMS2016000310.1520/SSMS20160003 ↗
6. A.Wiberg J. A.Persson andJ.Ölvander “A Design Automation Framework Supporting Design for Additive Manufacturing ” inInternational Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2023) V002T02A083 87295.10.1115/DETC2023-116415 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-030-56127-710.1007/978-3-030-56127-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11260310.1016/j.matdes.2023.112603 ↗
9. 10.1557/mrs.2019.15710.1557/mrs.2019.157 ↗
10. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship
11. 10.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_293-210.1007/978-3-319-63962-8_293-2 ↗
12. Shared Metadata for Data‐Centric Materials Science
13. Knowledge Graph Refinement: A Survey of Approaches and Evaluation Methods
14. Completing and Debugging Ontologies: State of the Art and Challenges in Repairing Ontologies
15. LiUSemWeb/PBF‐AMP‐Onto
16. 10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.00610.1016/j.compind.2019.03.006 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11665-021-06274-210.1007/s11665-021-06274-2 ↗
18. Y.Park P.Witherell andH.Cho “Ontology‐Based Context‐Aware Data Analytics in Additive Manufacturing ” inInternational Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2024):V02BT02A028 88353.10.1115/DETC2024-138090 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.403945510.1115/1.4039455 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.403578710.1115/1.4035787 ↗
21. Lambrix P. · 2000
22. 10.1115/1.404353110.1115/1.4043531 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compind.2023.10391210.1016/j.compind.2023.103912 ↗
24. T.Madreiter P.Besinger S.Archila L.Kohl andF.Ansari “Knowledge‐graph based approach for automated selection of spare parts suitable for additive manufacturing: a railway use‐case ” in12th International Conference on Through‐life Engineering Services (2024).
25. 10.1007/s10489-024-05757-810.1007/s10489-024-05757-8 ↗
26. Employing Natural Language Processing to Build a Knowledge Graph in the Realm of Additive Manufacturing
27. 10.1002/adem.20240152810.1002/adem.202401528 ↗
28. 10.1557/s43580-024-00874-510.1557/s43580-024-00874-5 ↗
29. 10.1145/1567274.156727810.1145/1567274.1567278 ↗
30. Ontological Engineering: A State of the Art
31. Studer R. · 2013
32. H.Li R.Armiento andP.Lambrix “An Ontology for the Materials Design Domain Proceedings Part II ” inThe Semantic Web ‐ ISWC. 2020 ‐ 19th International Semantic Web Conference Athens Greece(Springer 2020) 212–227 12507.10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_14 ↗
33. Mina Abd Nikooie Pour, Ying Li. “the Materials Design Ontology
34. P. D.Nostro J.Friis E.Ghedini et al. “Elementary Multiperspective Material Ontology: Leveraging Perspectives via a Showcase of EMMO‐Based Domain and Application Ontologies ” inProceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management(INSTICC: SciTePress 2024) 135–142 2.10.5220/0012910200003838 ↗
35. Bittner T. · 2005 · 139
36. 10.1145/344777210.1145/3447772 ↗
37. Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review performance
38. 10.1080/09506608.2016.117628910.1080/09506608.2016.1176289 ↗
39. Suárez‐Figueroa M.C. · 2011 · 9
40. Baader F. · 2003
41. R.Haas P. J.Keller J.Hodges andJ.Spivak Quantities Units Dimensions and Data Types Ontologies (QUDT) Technical report Top Quadrant and NASA 2014.
42. Abd Nikooie Pour M. · 2024 · 2